| Literature DB >> 33805471 |
Nora El-Rashidy1, Shaker El-Sappagh2,3, S M Riazul Islam4, Hazem M El-Bakry5, Samir Abdelrazek5.
Abstract
Chronic diseases are becoming more widespread. Treatment and monitoring of these diseases require going to hospitals frequently, which increases the burdens of hospitals and patients. Presently, advancements in wearable sensors and communication protocol contribute to enriching the healthcare system in a way that will reshape healthcare services shortly. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is the foremost of these advancements. RPM systems are based on the collection of patient vital signs extracted using invasive and noninvasive techniques, then sending them in real-time to physicians. These data may help physicians in taking the right decision at the right time. The main objective of this paper is to outline research directions on remote patient monitoring, explain the role of AI in building RPM systems, make an overview of the state of the art of RPM, its advantages, its challenges, and its probable future directions. For studying the literature, five databases have been chosen (i.e., science direct, IEEE-Explore, Springer, PubMed, and science.gov). We followed the (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) PRISMA, which is a standard methodology for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A total of 56 articles are reviewed based on the combination of a set of selected search terms including RPM, data mining, clinical decision support system, electronic health record, cloud computing, internet of things, and wireless body area network. The result of this study approved the effectiveness of RPM in improving healthcare delivery, increase diagnosis speed, and reduce costs. To this end, we also present the chronic disease monitoring system as a case study to provide enhanced solutions for RPMs.Entities:
Keywords: AI; clinical-decision support system; cloud computing; electronic health; electronic health record; internet of things; remote patient monitoring; wireless body area network
Year: 2021 PMID: 33805471 PMCID: PMC8067150 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Steps used to select articles.
Keywords used to obtain eligible articles.
| Key Words | Databases | Total Publication Identified | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Science | IEEE | Springer | Scince.gov | PubMed | ||
| 1 | Remote patient monitoring | 326 | 619 | 506 | 699 | 800 | 2950 |
| 2 | Remote patient monitoring AND clinical decision support system | 4 | 160 | 118 | 267 | 29 | 578 |
| 3 | Remote patient monitoring AND ontology | 16 | 18 | 23 | 237 | 44 | 338 |
| 4 | Remote Patient monitoring AND data mining | 24 | 46 | 42 | 84 | 23 | 219 |
| 5 | Remote patient monitoring AND wireless body Area network | 16 | 15 | 30 | 102 | 10 | 173 |
| 6 | Remote patient monitoring AND ontology AND (cloud computing OR Fog computing) | 8 | 7 | 85 | 42 | 2 | 144 |
| 7 | Remote patient monitoring AND ontology AND cloud computing and wireless body area network AND clinical decision support system | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Total | 395 | 865 | 809 | 1433 | 911 | 4413 | |
Figure 2(a) Number of articles per year; (b) Distribution of RPMs according to diseases.
Figure 3The general architecture of RPMs.
Transmission protocols.
| Power Requirement | Frequency | Coverage | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very Low | 2.4 GHz | 70–100 m | Zigbee |
| Medium | 1 MHZ | 10 M | Bluetooth |
| High | 2.4 GHZ | 100 M | Wi-Fi |
| Low | 10 KM | LoRa |
Description of selected articles.
| # | Diseases | Collected Data | Sensor | Transmission Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Heart diseases | ECG | ECG monitor node | Wi-Fi (HTTP, MQTT) |
| [ | Heart diseases | ECG | ECG fabric sensor embedded on the patient’s chair | Bluetooth |
| [ | Pain assessment | Facial expression (sEMG) | Wearable sensor with a bio-sensing facial mask | Wi-Fi |
| [ | Heart diseases | Spo2, blood pressure, ECG | Wi-Fi | |
| [ | Heart diseases | ECG | Wearable smart clothing | Bluetooth |
| [ | Dementia | Changes in behaviors and Functional health | Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Photoplenthys (PPG), Accelerometer (ACC) | Wi-Fi |
| [ | Chronic diseases | Monitor medication adherence | Smart home sensors | Wi-Fi |
| [ | Chronic diseases | Monitor medication adherence | Wristband wearable sensor | Bluetooth |
| [ | Fall detection | Monitor mentions and predict falls | Accelerometer, Cardiotachometer | ZigBee |
| [ | Heart diseases | Spo2, HR | Wireless pulse oximeter | Wi-Fi |
| [ | Hypertension | Blood pressure | Electronic blood pressure measurement | Bluetooth |
Difference between cloud computing and fog computing.
| Factor | Cloud Computing | Fog Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Delaying | High | Low |
| Mobility ability | Limited | Supported |
| Geo-distribution | Centralized | Distributed |
| Bandwidth consumption | High | Low |
| Storage capabilities | Strong | Weak |
| Power consumption | High | Low |
| Location identification | Partially supported | Fully supported |
| Number of servers | Few | Large |
| Real-time interaction | Supported | Supported |
| security | Undefined | Defined |
| Service location | With the Internet | At the edge of the local network |
Figure 4Fog computing layers in RPMs.
Description of CDSS papers.
| Performance | Methods | Data Collection | Diseases | # |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99.30% | Ontology, interoperability, CDSS | 115,477 records collected from of 36,162 type 2 diabetic patients | Chronic diseases | [ |
| - | Ontology, sensors | Ontology tested on “SPARQL” Query | Cardiovascular | [ |
| 87% | Fuzzy logic, ontology reasoning | The system evaluated in Taichung Hospital in central Taiwan | Diabetes | [ |
| 97.67% | Fuzzy ontology CBR | 60 real cases from Mansoura university hospitals | Diabetes | [ |
| Machine learning | 90 patients with gestational diabetes | Diabetes | [ | |
| 92% | Case base finding | 323 real cases | COPD diseases | [ |
| 90–95% | Machine learning (24 classifier combination) | 85 patients | Real time monitoring | [ |
| 89% | Machine learning, ontology | Real-time patient data form Biosensors | Mental disorders | [ |
| - | Ontology-driven | English lung cancer dataset (LUCADA), approximate (115,000) patient recode | Lung cancer | [ |
Comparison between HL7 v3 and HL7 FIHR [84].
| Factor | HL7 v3 | HL7 FIHR |
|---|---|---|
| Year of initiation | 1997 | 2011 |
| Development Methodology | Top-down | Incremental |
| Semantic ontology | Yes | Yes |
| Architecture | Massages | RESTful web services |
| Tooling required | Yes, just compiler | No |
| Industry support | Weak | Yes |
| Adoption degree | Low | Expected to be high |
| Industry support | Weak | n/a |
| Character support? | Yes (conceptually) | Yes (UTF8) |
| Massage format support | Realm | Global standard |
Figure 5Case study for monitoring system for chronic disease patients.
Comparison between RPM Papers.
| # | Diseases | DM | IoT | WBAN | Cloud | Ontology | Interoperability | CDSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Chronic diseases | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Cardiovascular | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Heart diseases | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Ubiquitous monitoring system | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Pain assessment | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Heart diseases | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Knees rehabilitation | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Vital signs gathering and processing | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Chronic diseases | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Hypertension | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Tracking daily activities | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | EXP carried on healthy volunteers | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Context aware monitoring | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Diabetes and Diet monitoring | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Heart diseases | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Diabetes | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Diabetes | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Mental disorder | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Chronic diseases | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Monitor patients with depression | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Cardiovascular diseases | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Hypertension, hypotension | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Diabetes | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Heart diseases | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Knee arthroplasty | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Elderly | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Diabetes | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 |
| [ | Parkinson’s disease | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Fall detection | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 |
| [ | Diabetes | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
| [ | Alzheimer’s | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗴 | 🗸 | 🗸 |
Remote patient monitoring projects and applications.
| System | Year | Description | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Help4Moodproject | 2014 | Health care system designed to help people with depression to return to their normal life, the system consists of three main component, (1) personal server to monitor patient behavior such as sleep activity, (2) interactive agent that interact and collect information from the user through questionnaire (3) DSS that analyze patient collected | |
| SHARE | 2015 | RPM system based on cloud computing, system propose proactive monitoring based on data mining functions, system combine CDSS that designed to respectively train and test the new data and adapt the system to predict vascular for whole the next year. | 67% |
| VISIGNET | 2014 | RPM system for chronic diseases, system monitor vital signs (Body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate) then send it to the cloud, the system permits patients and physicians to watch health data. In addition to that, they also provide visualization watch that classifies each vital sign according to special criteria. | 95% |
| M4CVD | 2015 | RPM for monitoring cardiovascular diseases that use wearable sensors to collect vital signs (Blood pressure, galvanic skin response (GSR) that indicate stress level, Electrocardiogram (ECG)), the system proposes a contribution to optimizing system effectiveness by analyzing data in the local device (smartphone), it was done using a machine learning algorithm (SVM) that classify patient data and extract the clinical features to determine patient condition “continued risk” or “no longer risk”. | 90.5% |
| WANDA | 2019 | A monitoring system for Cognitive heart failure (CHF) patients, it consists of three tiers (first layer: biosensors for monitoring patient data. Second layer: a web server that store and maintain data integrity layer between different healthcare providers, this layer also analyze data and sends an alert message via text message or emails. Third layer: back-end server backup and recovery layer by making an offline backup) | ---- |
| Health@Home project | 2016 | A remote monitoring system for cardiovascular diseases, the system has client/server architecture. Client-side: located at the patient side, consists of a set of biomedical sensors that measure patients of vital signs (ECG, SPO2, Chest impedance, respiration, blood pressure), then the measured sensors send through the gateway to the server-side. ADSL or mobile broadband (UTMS/GSM) used to transmit data. Server Side: installed at health service facilities, process and analyze data from gateway using the expert system, and make it available for consultation, and finally patient record in the patient information system (HIS). The system also provides an alarm system that sent by a short message to the physician, patient, and relatives. | |
| Nevonprojects | The system is used to track patient health status via two main sensors (temperature sensor and blood pressure sensor). Sensors are connected to a microcontroller that tracks patient status. |