| Literature DB >> 33805101 |
Ewa Olewnik-Kruszkowska1, Magdalena Gierszewska1, Sylwia Grabska-Zielińska1, Joanna Skopińska-Wiśniewska2, Ewelina Jakubowska1.
Abstract
Hydrogels based on chitosan are very versatile materiEntities:
Keywords: chitosan; crosslinking; mechanical properties; squaric acid; swelling
Year: 2021 PMID: 33805101 PMCID: PMC8037701 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structure of squaric acid (H2SQ).
Figure 2(a) Fourier transform infrared—Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) spectrum of chitosan (Ch) and (b) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of squaric acid (H2SQ).
Figure 3FTIR-ATR spectra of (a) chitosan (Ch) and squaric acid-crosslinked chitosan, (b) ChQ1, (c) ChQ2, and (d) ChQ3 (left: stacked spectra, right: overlapped spectra).
The position of characteristic bands [cm−1] in the FTIR spectra of H2SQ powder, and Ch- and squaric acid-modified chitosan films.
| Sample | C=O | C=C | Amide I | Amide II |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2SQ | 1814 | 1645 | - 2 | - 2 |
| Ch | - 2 | - 2 | 1632 | 1544 |
| ChQ1 | - 2 | ~1700 1 | 1631 | 1537 3 |
| ChQ2 | - 2 | ~1691 1 | 1631 | 1536 3 |
| ChQ3 | - 2 | ~1700 1 | 1631 | 1536 3 |
1 visible as a small shoulder on the amide I vibration band. 2 not detected. 3 amide II and C=N.
Figure 4Schematic chemical structure of chitosan crosslinked with squaric acid.
Figure 5Equilibrium swelling degree of non-modified and squaric acid-crosslinked chitosan films in water and different buffered solutions.
Figure 6Degree of ionization of chitosan vs. pH.
Figure 72D and 3D atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the surface topography of Ch and ChQ films.
Values of roughness root mean square roughness (Rq) and roughness average (Ra) parameters and thermal stability of studied materials.
| Sample | Rq [nm] | Ra [nm] | T5% [°C] | T10% [°C] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ch | 2.30 ± 0.02 | 1.89 ± 0.03 | 104.9 ± 0.2 | 145.7 ± 0.6 |
| ChQ1 | 2.68 ± 0.04 | 2.19 ± 0.10 | 105.4 ± 0.2 | 147.2 ± 0.3 |
| ChQ2 | 2.99 ± 0.04 | 2.51 ± 0.11 | 106.2 ± 0.4 | 147.9 ± 0.2 |
| ChQ3 | 3.67 ± 0.05 | 2.95 ± 0.13 | 115.8 ± 0.5 | 158.6 ± 0.9 |
Figure 8TG and DTG curves of unmodified (Ch) and modified chitosan (ChQ).
Figure 9(A) Young’s modulus (Emod); (B) tensile strength (σ), and (C) percentage elongation (ɛ) of chitosan and chitosan with squaric acid 1, 2, and 3 wt.% addition.
Color variables of studied materials.
| Sample | Color Variable 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | a | b | ΔE | |
| Ch | 90.40 ± 0.23 | −1.40 ± 0.02 | 5.04 ± 0.02 | - |
| ChQ1 | 82.51 ± 0.13 | −3.21 ± 0.06 | 24.39 ± 0.09 | 21.0 ± 0.19 |
| ChQ2 | 79.94 ± 0.09 | −3.93 ± 0.06 | 27.63 ± 0.11 | 25.0 ± 0.21 |
| ChQ3 | 77.42 ± 0.21 | −4.23 ± 0.09 | 29.51 ± 0.07 | 27.9 ± 0.13 |
1 mean value (three replicates).
Figure 10Shape of samples with dimension markings.