| Literature DB >> 33804971 |
Didem C Dogan1,2, Jiye Choi1,3, Min Ho Seo4, Eunjik Lee1, Namgee Jung4, Sung-Dae Yim1, Tae-Hyun Yang1, Gu-Gon Park1,2.
Abstract
In this study, we address the catalytic performance of variously sized Pt nanoparticles (NPs) (from 1.7 to 2.9 nm) supported on magnéli phase titanium oxide (MPTO, Ti4O7) along with commercial solid type carbon (VXC-72R) for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Key idea is to utilize a robust and electrically conductive MPTO as a support material so that we employed it to improve the catalytic activity and durability through the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI). Furthermore, we increase the specific surface area of MPTO up to 61.6 m2 g-1 to enhance the SMSI effect between Pt NP and MPTO. After the deposition of a range of Pt NPs on the support materials, we investigate the ORR activity and durability using a rotating disk electrode (RDE) technique in acid media. As a result of accelerated stress test (AST) for 30k cycles, regardless of the Pt particle size, we confirmed that Pt/MPTO samples show a lower electrochemical surface area (ECSA) loss (<20%) than that of Pt/C (~40%). That is explained by the increased dissolution potential and binding energy of Pt on MPTO against to carbon, which is supported by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Based on these results, we found that conductive metal oxides could be an alternative as a support material for the long-term fuel cell operation.Entities:
Keywords: catalyst support; density functional theory; magnéli phase titanium oxide; polymer electrolyte fuel cells; size effect
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804971 PMCID: PMC8063942 DOI: 10.3390/nano11040829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Designed models of (a) Pt/C and (b) Pt/MPTO.
Figure 2Simulated charge distribution of (a) Pt/C and (b) Pt/MPTO.
The oxygen adsorption strengths, cohesive energies, and dissolution potentials regarding Pt bulk, a Pt nanoparticle, Pt/graphite and Pt/MPTO.
| Atomic Oxygen (eV/O) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt (111) 1 | Pt55 NP | Pt55/Graphite | Pt55/MPTO | |||||
| Pt-FCC | Pt-FCC | top-FCC | side-FCC | bottom-FCC | top-FCC | side-FCC | bottom-FCC | |
| Eads, eV | −3.92 | −4.39 | −3.79 | −3.59 | −3.75 | −3.57 | −3.62 | −3.74 |
| ΔEO−ΔEOPt(111), eV | 0 | −0.47 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.17 |
| Ecoh, eV | 4.85 | 4.86 | 5.06 | |||||
| Udiss-Pt shell vs. SHE, eV | - | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.76 | ||||
1 Oxygen adsorption strength for a 1/4 monolayer of O on a (2 × 2) unit cell of Pt slab model.
Figure 3Top and side views of the relaxed Pt55 nanoparticle cuboctahedron on (a) MPTO (b) graphite. The values are given for each Pt atom in the Pt nanoparticle.
Figure 4Top view of (a–c) Pt55/graphite and (d–f) Pt55/MPTO where O is adsorbed at top, side and bottom on the FCC sites of Pt nanoparticle, as indicated by circles.
Figure 5(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of wet milled MPTO, as-synthesized MPTO, MPTO and TiO2 lattice information obtained from ICSD database. (b) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm of wet milled MPTO.
Figure 6TEM images and particle size histograms of (a–c) Pt/MPTO and (d–f) Pt/C.
Pt loading, TEM particle size and XRD particle size data.
| Samples | Pt Loading | Particle Size | Particle Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/MPTO | 11.4 | 1.76 | - |
| Pt/MPTO | 8.6 | 2.91 | - |
| Pt/C | 19.2 | 1.70 | - |
| Pt/C | 20.1 | 2.90 | 3.00 |
Figure 7Density of state (DOS) for TiO2 (up) and Ti4O7 (bottom), respectively.
Figure 8(a,b) CVs of Pt/MPTO and Pt/C, (c,d) LSVs, (e) ECSAs, (f) MA at 0.9V of Pt/MPTO and Pt/C. (BOL: beginning of life, EOL: end of life).