| Literature DB >> 33804905 |
Danilo Sanfilippo1,2, Bahman Ghiassi1, Alessio Alexiadis2, Alvaro Garcia Hernandez1.
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the use of peridynamics and discrete multiphysics to assess micro crack formation and proal">pagation inEntities:
Keywords: asphalt; discrete multiphysics; mathematical modelling; peridynamics
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804905 PMCID: PMC8036844 DOI: 10.3390/ma14071579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Deformation of the bond involved in (4) and in relation to the reference state ε, the deformation state η and the displacement state U.
Figure 2(a) Lennard Jones potential and (b) Harmonic potential.
Lennard Jones and Harmonic potentials and forces.
| Lennard Jones | Harmonic | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| (15) |
|
|
| (16) |
Asphalt mixture composition.
| Size (mm) | Passing (%) DA | Passing (%) PA #1 | Passing (%) PA #2 | Passing (%) PA #3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.9 | 0.0 | 20 | 10 |
|
| 15.8 | 0.0 | 25 | 38 |
|
| 21.3 | 35.1 | 26 | 35 |
|
| 14.2 | 19.3 | 7 | 0 |
|
| 47.8 | 45.6 | 22 | 17 |
|
| 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.3 |
|
| 5.0 | 10.0 | 13 | 21 |
Figure 3Asphalt (DA): blue particles represent the mortar; red particles represent the aggregate.
Figure 4Samples (a) PA #1; (b) PA #2; (c) PA #3. Blue particles represent the mortar, red particles the aggregate.
Figure 5Examples of PA #1 with a range of air void contents. (a) 0%; (b) 5 %; and (c) 10 %.
Asphalt mixture composition.
| Passing (%) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (mm) | PA#1 7.5% | PA#1 5% | PA#1 2.5% | PA#1 0% | PA#2 9.75% | PA#2 6.5% | PA#2 3.25% | PA#2 0% | PA#3 15.75% | PA#3 10.5% | PA#2 5.25% | PA#3 0% |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 19.5 | 19.0 | 18.5 | 18.1 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.9 | 8.6 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24.5 | 23.8 | 23.2 | 22.7 | 36.3 | 35.0 | 33.5 | 32.3 |
|
| 34.5 | 33.9 | 33.3 | 32.5 | 25.3 | 24.7 | 24.1 | 23.5 | 33.4 | 32.2 | 30.9 | 29.7 |
|
| 18.9 | 18.5 | 18.2 | 18.0 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 30.0 | 29.4 | 28.8 | 28.4 | 8.8 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.0 |
|
| 16.6 | 18.2 | 19.7 | 21.1 | 15.1 | 17.2 | 19.2 | 21.0 | 13.8 | 17.2 | 20.5 | 23.4 |
|
| 5.2 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 5.2 | 6.2 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 5.1 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 9.5 |
|
| 7.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 9.75 | 6.5 | 3.25 | 0 | 15.75 | 10.5 | 5.25 | 0 |
Topological properties of the voids calculated from the CT-scans.
| Sample | Void Content [%] | Mean Void Diameter [mm] | Mean Void Area [mm2] | Mean Void Perimeter [mm] | Mean Void Aspect Ratio [—] | Mean Void Circularity [—] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 2.50 | 1.19 | 1.11 | 2.80 | 1.87 | 0.72 |
|
| 5.00 | 1.47 | 1.70 | 3.63 | 1.99 | 0.67 |
|
| 7.50 | 1.67 | 2.19 | 4.27 | 2.03 | 0.65 |
|
| 10.00 | 1.82 | 2.60 | 4.82 | 2.03 | 0.64 |
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 3.25 | 2.22 | 3.87 | 7.83 | 2.41 | 0.54 |
|
| 6.50 | 3.29 | 8.50 | 10.05 | 2.41 | 0.51 |
|
| 9.75 | 3.82 | 11.46 | 11.60 | 2.38 | 0.49 |
|
| 13.00 | 3.42 | 9.18 | 13.48 | 2.40 | 0.48 |
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 5.25 | 3.73 | 10.92 | 20.75 | 2.29 | 0.48 |
|
| 10.50 | 4.79 | 18.01 | 23.80 | 2.11 | 0.49 |
|
| 15.75 | 5.57 | 24.35 | 23.95 | 2.16 | 0.47 |
|
| 21.00 | 6.06 | 28.83 | 19.36 | 2.11 | 0.51 |
Figure 6(a) PA #2/0.65% ice; (b) PA #2/1.3% ice; (c) PA #2/3.25% ice; (d) PA #2/6.5% ice; (e) PA #2/9.75% ice; (f) PA #2/13% ice Ice is represented by yellow particles.
Mechanical properties of bitumen, mastic and aggregates at −10 °C used in the simulations.
| Material | ρ [kg m3] | ν [-] | G0 [kJ/m2] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 | 3.7 | 0.30 | — | |
| 2200 | 18.2 | 0.25 | 270.00 | |
| 2500 | 56.8 | 0.15 | 0.25 | |
| — | 18.2 | 0.25 | 77.00 |
Peridynamic parameters used in the simulations. s00 is defined by Equation (9).
| Model | α [—] | N | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 3366 |
| 5 × 10−4 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 23,331 | |
| 2 × 10−4 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 332,826 | |
| 1 × 10−4 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 2,580,651 | |
|
| 1 × 10−3 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 3927 |
| 5 × 10−4 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 14,847 | |
| 2 × 10−4 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 76,806 | |
| 1 × 10−4 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 0.30 | 303,606 | |
|
| 1 × 10−4 | 6.4 × 10−3 | 0.25 | — |
|
| 1 × 10−4 | 1.3 × 10−4 | 0.25 | — |
|
| 1 × 10−4 | 3.4 × 10−3 | 0.25 | — |
|
| 4 × 10−4 | 3.2 × 10−3 | 0.25 | — |
|
| 4 × 10−4 | 6.5 × 10−5 | 0.25 | — |
|
| 4 × 10−4 | 1.7 × 10−3 | 0.25 | — |
Figure 7Geometries of bitumen for tensile tests. (a) 3D, l = 10−3 m; (b) 3D, l = 5 × 10−4 m; (c) 3D, l = 2 × 10−4 m; (d) example of a thin plate, l = 2 × 10−4 m.
Figure 8Broken bitumen sample in the simulation.
Figure 9Stress/strain of bitumen beams at different resolutions and loading rate and comparison with other experiments [45]. (a) In 3D and (b) as a thin plate.
Figure 10(a) Stress (blue curve) and the fraction of broken bond (damage, orange curve) versus strain. (b) Micro-crack formation in an asphalt specimen.
Figure 11Stress/strain curves for PA #1 (a), PA #2 (b) and PA #3 (c) samples.
Pearson correlations between the mechanical and the topological properties of the samples.
| Properties | Void Content | Mean Void Diameter [mm] | Mean Void Area | Mean Void Aspect Ratio | Mean Void Circularity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.62 | −0.64 | −0.58 | −0.52 | −0.37 |
|
| −0.77 | −0.92 | −0.82 | −0.73 | −0.41 |
|
| −0.26 | 0.02 | 0.09 | −0.32 | −0.57 |
Figure 12Changes of with void %.
Figure 13Cracking propagation due to ice expansion: (a) geometry; (b) damage.
Figure 14Reduction of peak stress with ice %.