| Literature DB >> 33804730 |
Qianqian Yu1,2, Bruce Cooper3, Tiago Sobreira3, Yuan H Brad Kim1.
Abstract
This study was performed to assess the changes in meat quality and metabolome profiles of meat exudate during postmortem aging. At 24 h postmortem, longissimus lumborum muscles were collected from 10 pork carcasses, cut into three sections, and randomly assigned to three aging period groups (2, 9, and 16 d). Meat quality and chemical analyses, along with the metabolomics of meat exudates using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (UHPLC-QTOF-MS) platform, were conducted. Results indicated a declined (p < 0.05) display color stability, and increased (p < 0.05) purge loss, meat tenderness, and lipid oxidation as aging extended. The principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis exhibited distinct clusters of the exudate metabolome of each aging treatment. A total of 39 significantly changed features were tentatively identified via matching them to METLIN database according to their MS/MS information. Some of those features are associated with adenosine triphosphate metabolism (creatine and hypoxanthine), antioxidation (oxidized glutathione and carnosine), and proteolysis (dipeptides and tripeptides). The findings provide valuable information that reflects the meat quality's attributes and could be used as a source of potential biomarkers for predicting aging times and meat quality changes.Entities:
Keywords: aging; metabolome; pork purge; quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (UHPLC-QTOF-MS)
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804730 PMCID: PMC8004023 DOI: 10.3390/foods10030668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
The pH and water-holding capacity changes of pork loins during postmortem aging.
| Aging Time | 1 d (24 h) | 2 d | 9 d | 16 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 5.65 ± 0.01 a | 5.55 ± 0.01 c | 5.59 ± 0.01 b | 5.57 ± 0.01 b |
| Purge loss (%) | - | 3.23 ± 0.30 c | 5.41 ± 0.50 b | 7.80 ± 0.55 a |
| Drip loss (%) | - | 6.17 ± 0.31 a | 2.74 ± 0.16 b | 1.46 ± 0.18 c |
| Cooking loss (%) | - | 28.33 ± 0.90 | 28.01 ± 0.73 | 25.74 ± 1.06 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Means with different letters (a–c) in a row are different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1The effect of aging on the changes in L* (a), a* (b), b* (c), hue angle (d), and chroma (e) of pork steak during 5 days of display. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. The significant differences among three aging treatments at the same display time were marked with asterisks (* means p < 0.05; ** means p < 0.01).
Figure 2The effect of aging treatments on shear force (a) and the myofibril fragmentation index (b) of the pork meat. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Means with different letters (a–c) are different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3The effect of aging treatments on lipid (a) and protein (b) oxidation of pork meat. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Means with different letters (a, b) are different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4The principal component analysis (PCA) score plots (a), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) score plots (b), and volcano plots (c) of metabolome in pork exudate. D02, D09, and D16 refer to pork exudate from 2 d, 9 d, and 16 d postmortem aging treatments, respectively.
Tentatively identified metabolites that have changed significantly among the three aging treatments.
| Name | Mass |
| MS1 Error (ppm) | RT 1 | Adduct Ion Name | D16 vs. D02 | D09 vs. D02 | D16 vs. D09 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold-Change | FDR 2 | Fold-Change | FDR | Fold-Change | FDR | ||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Creatine | 131.0703 | 132.0774 | −5.15 | 0.92 | (M+H)+ | 0.457 | 0.026 | 0.372 | 0.004 | ||
| 2-Phenylacetamide | 135.0795 | 136.0764 | −5.08 | 3.13 | (M+H)+ | 0.344 | 0.019 | 0.339 | 0.006 | ||
| Hypoxanthine | 136.0382 | 137.0466 | −5.75 | 1.32 | (M+H)+ | 0.127 | 0.004 | 0.238 | 0.048 | ||
| N-Methylisoleucine | 145.1103 | 146.1183 | −4.81 | 4.31 | (M+H)+ | 0.426 | 0.001 | ||||
| L-Histidine | 155.0698 | 156.0773 | −3.2 | 1.04 | (M+H)+ | 0.473 | 0.000 | ||||
| Carnosine | 226.1071 | 227.1149 | −4.69 | 1.03 | (M+H)+ | 0.420 | 0.011 | ||||
| Isobutyryl carnitine | 232.1432 | 232.1559 | −6.88 | 4.75 | (M)+ | 0.423 | 0.010 | ||||
| His Glu | 284.1101 | 285.1208 | −5.29 | 1.36 | (M+H)+ | 0.413 | 0.000 | ||||
| Lys Pro Ile | 356.2432 | 357.2509 | −3.5 | 0.83 | (M+H)+ | 0.492 | 0.002 | ||||
| Glutathione, oxidized | 612.1505 | 613.1613 | −3.39 | 1.49 | (M+H)+ | 0.432 | 0.000 | ||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Pro Ala | 186.1004 | 187.1086 | −4.88 | 1.12 | (M+H)+ | 3.170 | 0.001 | 2.206 | 0.006 | ||
| Ala Val | 188.1155 | 189.1242 | −4.23 | 1.32 | (M+H)+ | 2.175 | 0.000 | ||||
| Ile Gly | 188.1162 | 189.1242 | −4.23 | 2.86 | (M+H)+ | 3.190 | 0.000 | 2.198 | 0.000 | ||
| L-Leucyl-L- Alanine | 202.1319 | 203.14 | −4.93 | 2.53 | (M+H)+ | 3.316 | 0.003 | 3.011 | 0.009 | ||
| Spermine | 202.1317 | 203.2239 | −4.12 | 3.28 | (M+H)+ | 2.899 | 0.018 | 2.480 | 0.042 | ||
| Val Ser | 204.111 | 205.1196 | −6.27 | 0.88 | (M+H)+ | 2.766 | 0.001 | 2.018 | 0.011 | ||
| Pro Thr | 216.1095 | 217.1191 | −3.88 | 1.25 | (M+H)+ | 4.626 | 0.001 | 3.379 | 0.004 | ||
| Val Val | 216.1477 | 217.1556 | −4.14 | 3.43 | (M+H)+ | 7.910 | 0.000 | 5.018 | 0.000 | ||
| Ile Ser | 218.1267 | 219.1347 | −3.7 | 1.2 | (M+H)+ | 4.945 | 0.000 | 3.137 | 0.002 | ||
| Val Leu | 230.1631 | 231.1711 | −3.57 | 5.69 | (M+H)+ | 4.716 | 0.000 | 3.693 | 0.003 | ||
| Asn Val | 231.1215 | 232.1303 | −4.81 | 1.3 | (M+H)+ | 4.741 | 0.000 | 4.416 | 0.012 | ||
| Leu Thr | 232.1424 | 233.1506 | −4.45 | 1.9 | (M+H)+ | 5.627 | 0.003 | 3.262 | 0.042 | ||
| Ala Phe | 236.1162 | 237.1244 | −4.24 | 5.76 | (M+H)+ | 8.885 | 0.000 | 4.650 | 0.007 | ||
| Ile Ile | 244.1783 | 245.1869 | −3.77 | 7.8 | (M+H)+ | 6.780 | 0.001 | 3.081 | 0.014 | ||
| Ile Asp | 246.1218 | 247.1296 | −3.2 | 4.05 | (M+H)+ | 2.105 | 0.000 | 2.146 | 0.000 | ||
| Asp Leu | 246.122 | 247.1296 | −3.2 | 4.43 | (M+H)+ | 5.903 | 0.000 | 4.222 | 0.000 | ||
| Tyr Ala | 252.1115 | 253.1196 | −5.21 | 2.42 | (M+H)+ | 2.381 | 0.026 | 2.911 | 0.027 | ||
| Ala Ile Gly | 259.1553 | 260.1617 | −4.61 | 1.36 | (M+H)+ | 6.617 | 0.000 | 5.237 | 0.000 | ||
| Pro Leu Gly | 285.1685 | 286.1771 | −3.26 | 6.11 | (M+H)+ | 3.141 | 0.007 | 2.213 | 0.025 | ||
| Val Ile Gly | 287.186 | 288.1939 | −7.4 | 4.32 | (M+H)+ | 9.503 | 0.000 | 4.396 | 0.007 | ||
| His Phe | 302.1376 | 303.1463 | −3.65 | 2.74 | (M+H)+ | 9.624 | 0.000 | 5.950 | 0.001 | ||
| Gly Lys Leu | 316.2111 | 317.2195 | −3.54 | 2 | (M+H)+ | 123.990 | 0.000 | 37.504 | 0.001 | 3.306 | 0.041 |
| Val Val Asp | 331.1744 | 332.1832 | −4.66 | 3.51 | (M+H)+ | 47.939 | 0.000 | 19.345 | 0.001 | ||
| Val Glu Glu | 375.1641 | 376.173 | −4.06 | 3.07 | (M+H)+ | 3.433 | 0.005 | 3.348 | 0.024 | ||
1 RT is the average retention time. 2 FDR is the false discovery rate of the T-test. D02, D09, and D16 refer to pork exudate from 2 d, 9 d, and 16 d postmortem aging treatments, respectively.