Literature DB >> 33804541

Monitoring Training and Recovery during a Period of Increased Intensity or Volume in Recreational Endurance Athletes.

Olli-Pekka Nuuttila1, Ari Nummela2, Keijo Häkkinen1, Santtu Seipäjärvi3, Heikki Kyröläinen1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of progressively increased training intensity or volume on the nocturnal heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), countermovement jump, perceived recovery, and heart rate-running speed index (HR-RS index). Another aim was to analyze how observed patterns during the training period in these monitoring variables were associated with the changes in endurance performance. Thirty recreationally trained participants performed a 10-week control period of regular training and a 10-week training period of either increased training intensity (INT, n = 13) or volume (VOL, n = 17). Changes in endurance performance were assessed by an incremental treadmill test. Both groups improved their maximal speed on the treadmill (INT 3.4 ± 3.2%, p < 0.001; VOL 2.1 ± 1.8%, p = 0.006). In the monitoring variables, only between-group difference (p = 0.013) was found in nocturnal HR, which decreased in INT (p = 0.016). In addition, perceived recovery decreased in VOL (p = 0.021) and tended to decrease in INT (p = 0.056). When all participants were divided into low-responders and responders in maximal running performance, the increase in the HR-RS index at the end of the training period was greater in responders (p = 0.005). In conclusion, current training periods of increased intensity or volume improved endurance performance to a similar extent. Countermovement jump and HRV remained unaffected, despite a slight decrease in perceived recovery. Long-term monitoring of the HR-RS index may help to predict positive adaptations, while interpretation of other recovery-related markers may need a more individualized approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endurance performance; heart rate variability; running; training load

Year:  2021        PMID: 33804541      PMCID: PMC7967764          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  41 in total

Review 1.  What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes?

Authors:  Stephen Seiler
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.010

2.  Seasonal strength performance and its relationship with training load on elite runners.

Authors:  Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández; Carlos M Tejero-González; Juan Del Campo-Vecino
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise: implications for training prescription.

Authors:  Jamie Stanley; Jonathan M Peake; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Endurance training guided individually by daily heart rate variability measurements.

Authors:  Antti M Kiviniemi; Arto J Hautala; Hannu Kinnunen; Mikko P Tulppo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Athletic performance in relation to training load.

Authors:  C Foster; E Daines; L Hector; A C Snyder; R Welsh
Journal:  Wis Med J       Date:  1996-06

6.  Prediction of Functional Overreaching From Subjective Fatigue and Readiness to Train After Only 3 Days of Cycling.

Authors:  Twan Ten Haaf; Selma van Staveren; Erik Oudenhoven; Maria F Piacentini; Romain Meeusen; Bart Roelands; Leo Koenderman; Hein A M Daanen; Carl Foster; Jos J de Koning
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.010

7.  Acute Physiological Responses to Four Running Sessions Performed at Different Intensity Zones.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Nuuttila; Heikki Kyröläinen; Keijo Häkkinen; Ari Nummela
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale.

Authors:  C Matthew Laurent; J Matt Green; Phillip A Bishop; Jesper Sjökvist; Randall E Schumacker; Mark T Richardson; Matt Curtner-Smith
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Heart rate variability in elite triathletes, is variation in variability the key to effective training? A case comparison.

Authors:  Daniel J Plews; Paul B Laursen; Andrew E Kilding; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 10.  Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes.

Authors:  Shona L Halson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Validity of the Wrist-Worn Polar Vantage V2 to Measure Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability at Rest.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Nuuttila; Elisa Korhonen; Jari Laukkanen; Heikki Kyröläinen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Physiological, Perceptual, and Performance Responses to the 2-Week Block of High- versus Low-Intensity Endurance Training.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Nuuttila; Ari Nummela; Heikki Kyröläinen; Jari Laukkanen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-01-24

3.  Individualized Endurance Training Based on Recovery and Training Status in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Nuuttila; Ari Nummela; Elisa Korhonen; Keijo Häkkinen; Heikki Kyröläinen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.