Literature DB >> 33804384

Diagnostic Value of Frequently Implemented Provocative Tests in the Assessment of Shoulder Pain-A Glimpse of Current Practice.

Nahum Rosenberg1.   

Abstract

Initial evaluation of chronic shoulder disability is a diagnostic challenge due to the anatomic complexity of the shoulder joints. For this purpose, several diagnostic tools utilizing provocative testing exist, but only a few have a reliable basis for their diagnostic value. Therefore, objectively determining the predictive value of these tests in identifying the precise anatomical source for disability-subacromial, intraarticular or other-is essential in order to proceed with further imaging evaluations for final objective diagnoses. Using validated clusters of provocative tests should improve their diagnostic values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic odds ratio; likelihood ratio; provocative test; shoulder joint; shoulder pain

Year:  2021        PMID: 33804384      PMCID: PMC7999976          DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  12 in total

1.  Clinical assessment of three common tests for superior labral anterior-posterior lesions.

Authors:  Edward G McFarland; Tae Kyun Kim; Richard M Savino
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review.

Authors:  J J Luime; B W Koes; I J M Hendriksen; A Burdorf; A P Verhagen; H S Miedema; J A N Verhaar
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  D L Simel; G P Samsa; D B Matchar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Beyond SpPIN and SnNOUT: Considerations with Dichotomous Tests During Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Eric J Hegedus; Ben Stern
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

5.  The use of shoulder scoring systems and outcome measures in the UK.

Authors:  M Varghese; J Lamb; R Rambani; B Venkateswaran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Combining orthopedic special tests to improve diagnosis of shoulder pathology.

Authors:  Eric J Hegedus; Chad Cook; Jeremy Lewis; Alexis Wright; Jin-Young Park
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

8.  Clinical features of the different types of SLAP lesions: an analysis of one hundred and thirty-nine cases.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; William S Queale; Andrew J Cosgarea; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The active compression test: a new and effective test for diagnosing labral tears and acromioclavicular joint abnormality.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; M J Pagnani; S Fealy; S R McGlynn; J B Wilson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  Sigmund Ø Gismervik; Jon O Drogset; Fredrik Granviken; Magne Rø; Gunnar Leivseth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.