Gas Separation by Mixed Matrix Membranes with Porous Organic Polymer Inclusions within o-Hydroxypolyamides Containing m-Terphenyl Moieties.

A hydroxypolyamide (HPA) manufactured from 2,2-bis(3-amino-4-hydroxy phenyl)-hexafluoropropane (APAF) diamine and 5'-terbutyl-m-terphenyl-4,4''-dicarboxylic acid chloride (tBTpCl), and a copolyimide produced by stochiometric copolymerization of APAF and 4,4'-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) diamine (6FpDA), using the same diacid chloride, were obtained and used as polymeric matrixes in mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) loaded with 20% (w/w) of two porous polymer networks (triptycene-isatin, PPN-1, and triptycene-trifluoroacetophenone, PPN-2). These MMMs, and also the thermally rearranged membranes (TR-MMMs) that underwent a thermal treatment process to convert the o-hydroxypolyamide moieties to polybenzoxazole ones, were characterized, and their gas separation properties evaluated for H2, N2, O2, CH4, and CO2. Both TR process and the addition of PPN increased permeability with minor decreases in selectivity for all gases tested. Excellent results were obtained, in terms of the permeability versus selectivity compromise, for H2/CH4 and H2/N2 separations with membranes approaching the 2008 Robeson's trade-off line. The best gas separation properties were obtained when PPN-2 was used. Finally, gas permeation was characterized in terms of chain intersegmental distance and fraction of free volume of the membrane along with the kinetic diameters of the permeated gases. The intersegmental distance increased after TR and/or the addition of PPN-2. Permeability followed an exponential dependence with free volume and a quadratic function of the kinetic diameter of the gas.

1. Introduction

Today, renewable energy systems are attracting an increasing interest due to tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he ever-growing energy demand at a global scale, decreasing prpapan>n class="Chemical">ices, and the urgent need to mitigate climate change [1]. In this context, hydrogen (H2) could play a key role in the energy sector since it represents a clean and cost-effective gaseous energy vector with a high specific energy content [2] that can substitute fossil fuels and thus reduce CO2 emissions [3,4,5]. For instance, H2 could replace natural gas during electricity generation in power plants or fossil fuels in transportation [6]. However, according to the most recent report of the International Energy Agency, fossil fuels are the main source of H2 production, which is responsible for at least 830 million tons of CO2 emissions per year. Indeed, H2 production accounted for 6% of global natural gas and 2% of global coal demand [3].

In this regard, sustainable H2 production from a renepan class="Chemical">wable source is needed to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and their associated CO2 footprint [2]. In recent years, a large research effort has been deployed to develop green technologies to generate renewable H2 [7]. Dark fermentation from biomass or water electrolysis using the surplus of renewable electricity rank among the most investigated technologies to generate green H2 [8]. On the other hand, pressure swing adsorption (PSA), cryogenic separation, and membrane separation represent the most implemented technologies for H2 purification [9]. According to Luo et al. [6], membrane separation is considered an energy-efficient and sustainable alternative since it does not require the regeneration of the adsorption materials or a high energy demand to decrease the temperature of the gas mixture below −78 °C.

Mixed matrix membranes (pan class="Chemical">MMMspan>) have recently experienced tpan class="Chemical">he most significant advances in membrane technology for pan class="Chemical">hydrogen purification [10]. MMMs consist of a mixture of organic or inorganic porous materials as dispersed phases (namely additive or filler) into a polymeric matrix as a continuous phase [10,11,12,13]. Well-designed MMMs benefit from the potential synergy between the polymeric matrix and fillers, which enhances the properties of MMMs compared to the pure polymer exhibiting superior performance in terms of the permeability-selectivity compromise [14,15]. Moreover, some polymer matrixes employed in MMMs can eventually undergo thermal transposition processes such as thermal rearrangement (TR) at high temperatures [1,16,17], which could further increase gas permeabilities. For instance, TR polymers originated from the thermal conversion of poly(o-hydroxyamide)s to polybenzoxazole (PBO) structures showed outstanding gas transport properties for the separation of CO2/CH4 mixtures [6,18].

The manufacture of high-performance MMMs depends on the selection of the appropriate filler to prevent the formation of non-selective voids caused [12,19]. In this sense, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with high surface area and porosity [20], porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) with a large surface area and high thermal stability [21], and hypercrosslinked polymers (HCPs) with high CO2 adsorption [22] have been successfully used as fillers for gas separation. Recently, novel materials based on porous polymer networks (PPNs) have been used as fillers in order to prepare MMMs with promising gas permeabilities [23]. In addition, these later materials exhibit outstanding chemical and thermal properties and excellent CO2 adsorption capacities [24]. Despite the potential of these MMMs, there is limited knowledge of the performance of thermally rearranged membranes (TR-MMMs) for gas separation applications.

This work aimed at manufacturing and testing novel pan class="Chemical">polymeric and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">copolymeric matrixes (derived from poly(o-hydroxypolyamide)s having 5′-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl moieties and hexafluoropropyl groups) able to undergo thermal rearrangement to TR-PBOs and also to obtain TR-MMMs with favorable gas transport properties for hydrogen separation using PPN as a filler (PPNs formed from isatin and triptycene, PPN-1, or from trifluoroacetophenone and triptycene, PPN-2). Polymers containing m-terphenyl groups typically show excellent thermal stability and high glass transition temperature [25,26]. However, these polymers showed low processability when the m-terphenylene derivative was not substituted (for instance, 5′-H-m-terphenyl derivatives) [25]. After attachment of a t-butyl group in the middle aromatic ring, the solubility improved a lot, and the gas separation properties were much better [25,27,28]. Thus, it was considered that the use of m-terphenyl units, having bulky groups, in polyamides and o-hydroxypolyamides should produce important improvements in the features of the materials derived from them. The PPNs herein used have superb chemical and thermal stability (higher than 450 °C) and high BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) surfaces (around 650 m2/g [24]), and they could bear the temperatures employed for carrying out the thermal rearrangement process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Anhydrous dimethyl acetamide (DMAc, 99%), pyridine (Py), dimethyl amino pyridine (DMAP), trimethylsilylchloride (TMSC, >98%), N, N dimethyl formamide (DMF), 3-methoxycarbonyl-phenylboronic acid, and tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as received. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (Pd(PPh3)4), potassium carbonate (K2CO3), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and thionyl chloride (SOCl2) were obtained from Scharlau (Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain). The diacid 5′-terbuthyl-m-terphenyl-4,4′′-dicarboxylic acid (tBTpDA) was synthesized following a procedure previously reported [29] and subsequently was converted to the monomer 5′-tertbutyl-m-terphenyl-4,4′′-dichloride acid (tBTpCl). 2,2-bis(3-amino-4-hydroxy phenyl)-hexafluoropropane (APAF) was purchased from Apollo Scientific (Apollo Scientific, Stockport, Cheshire, U.K.) and purified by sublimation at 220–225 °C before use. 4,4′-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) dianiline (6FpDA) was also purchased from Apollo Scientific and purified by sublimation at 180 °C before use.

pan class="Chemical">Apan class="Chemical">PAF and papan>n class="Chemical">tBTpCl were employed as monomers to synthesize the homo-o-hydroxypolyamide tBTpCl-APAF (HPA). Additionally, a copolyamide (HPA-PA) was prepared by mixing APAF with 6FpDA (at a 1/1 mol/mol ratio) with tBTpCl. For comparison’s sake, a non-TR-able polyamide without o-hydroxy groups (PA) was prepared from the monomers 6FpDA and tBTpCl. The synthesis of HPA, PA, and HPA-PA were carried out as described elsewhere [30], and it is outlined below.

2.2. Monomers Synthesis

2.2.1. Synthesis of 4-Carboxy-Phenylboronic Acid

A saponification reaction was used to convert tpan class="Chemical">he ester group of a commercial class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic acid to carboxylic acid (Figure 1). Thus, the 4-carboxy-phenylboronic acid was initially synthetized by the following procedure: In a round-bottomed flask, 113.91 mmol of 4-methoxycarbonyl-phenylboronic acid and 200 mL of a NaOH aqueous solution (10% w/w) were added. The solution was reflux-heated for 30 min. The resulting reaction was cooled down before filtering, and H2SO4 was added to adjust pH to 1. Due to the exothermic nature of the reaction, the solution was kept in an ice-water bath. The resulting precipitate was kept at 4 °C overnight. The precipitate was filtered, washed three times with distilled water, and allowed to dry at room temperature.

Figure 1

Synthesis of 4-carboxy-phenylboronic acid via saponification reaction.

2.2.2. Synthesis of (5′-Terbuthyl-m-terphenyl-4,4′′-dicarboxylic acid (p))

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> Suzuki–Miyaura [31] reaction was used in order to obtain a series of derivatives of m-terppan class="Chemical">henyl-4,4′′ dipan class="Chemical">carboxylic acid, having in the 5′ position a tert-butyl group (Figure 2). This reaction involved the formation of a C-C bond through a boronic derivative (4-carboxy-phenylboronic acid) and an organohalogenide (1,3-dibromo-5-tert-butyl-benzene) in the presence of a base (K2CO3) and a palladium (0) catalyst. The synthetic procedure is outlined below.

Figure 2

Suzuki–Miyakura synthesis of 5′-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-4,4′′-dicarboxylic acid.

A total of 12.5 mmol (3.64 g) of 1,3-dibromo-5-tert-buty-lbencene, 30.2 mmol (5 g) of 4-carboxy-phenylboronic acid, 1.2 mmol (1.36 g) of (Ph3P)4Pd(0), and 360 mL of DMF (previously deoxygenated) were added in a round-bottomed flask, according to a procedure adapted from Liao and Hsieh [32]. Deoxygenation using N2 (strictly inert atmosphere) was carried out before adding 79.8 mL of 3.2 M potassium carbonate solution to avoid the degradation of the catalyzer. The reaction was maintained at 80 °C for 8 h under magnetic stirring. Afterward, the reaction was transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask and cooled with ice before adding HCl until at pH 1. The formed suspension was then left overnight at 4 °C. The diacid compound was then separated as a solid by filtration and dissolved in 35 mL of NaOH (2 M). HCl (50:50) was added to adjust the pH to 1 to obtain a solid precipitate, which was filtered again and thoroughly washed with water and dried before rinsing with warm toluene. The resulting solid was allowed to dry at room temperature, thus obtaining tBTpDA with 88% yield.

2.2.3. Synthesis of tBTpCl Dichloride

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> pan class="Chemical">diacid previously syntpan class="Chemical">hetized was added into a round-bottomed flask equipped with a reflux condenser and magnetically stirred, along with SOCl2 and 5 drops of DMF under a N2 atmosphere, following the procedure described by Smith et al. [30]. The mixture was maintained at 50 °C for 4 h and at 80 °C for 2 h and afterward allowed to cool down to room temperature (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Synthesis of 5′-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-4,4′′-dichloride acid (tBTpCl).

Subsequently, tpan class="Chemical">hepan> reflux condenser was substituted by distillation equipment to eliminate tpan class="Chemical">he excess of pan class="Chemical">SOCl2, and a small amount of anhydrous toluene was added before distillation. The distillation process was initially carried out under vacuum at ambient temperature under a N2 atmosphere. To assure that SOCl2 was eliminated, anhydrous toluene was again added before increasing the temperature to 70 °C during the stripping-off process. Finally, anhydrous toluene was added before overnight cooling at 4 °C to crystallization. Finally, the liquid residue was eliminated under vacuum at 4 °C. tBTpCl was kept under a N2 atmosphere blanket to avoid hydration.

2.3. Polymers Synthesis

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> procedure for tpan class="Chemical">he syntpan class="Chemical">hesis of the polymers (tBTpCl-APAF (HPA), tBTpCl-6FpDA-APAF (HPA-PA), and tBTpCl-6FpDA, (PA)) was performed by the polycondensation reaction employing the in situ silylation methodology [33,34,35,36,37]. As an example, the synthesis of the o-hydroxy homopolyamide (HPA) is described in the following paragraphs.

In a 100 mL three-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer under a constant pan class="Chemical">N2 supply, 2.0 g (0.0055 mmol) of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">APAF was added and dissolved in 10 mL of N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc). The mixture was stirred at room temperature until the complete solubilization of the solid. Then, the solution was cooled by immersing the flask into an ice bath to reach 0 °C, and 2.77 mL of TMSC were dropwise added, followed by 1.76 mL of Py. The mixture was maintained at 0 °C and stirred for 10–15 min to ensure the formation of the silylated diamine [38]. Then, 2.25 g (0.0055 mmol) tBTpCl dichloride was poured into the flask and rinsed with 2 mL of DMAc. Finally, 0.267 g (2.18 mmol) of DMAP and 32 mL of DMAc were added. The reaction was stirred for 24 h at room temperature to complete the polymerization reaction. The resulting polymers were obtained as fiber-like shape and then washed with water, a 1/1 ethanol/water mixture, and collected by filtration. It was heated under vacuum at 100 °C for 24 h to obtain a dry polymer.

2.4. Casting Of Polymer Films

2.4.1. Films of Polymer Matrixes

To prepare tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he membranes, tpapan>n class="Chemical">he synthesized polymers were put in 10% (w/v) THF solutions and maintained under mechanical stirring until its complete dissolution. Before casting onto a glass plate, the solution was filtered through a 4.5 µm PTFE membrane filter to remove impurities. Part of the solvent was evaporated at room temperature overnight. The remaining solvent was slowly dried in a vacuum oven (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA) with the following protocol: 60 °C for 2 h and 80 °C for 2 h without vacuum, 100 °C for 2 h, 120 °C for 1 h, and finally 180 °C for 12 h under vacuum. The membranes manufactured presented thickness between 40–60 µm.

2.4.2. Preparation of Mixed Matrix Membranes

Mixed matrix membrane (MMMs) were prepared as described elsewhere [17,23]. The synthesized polymeric matrixes above were mixed with porous polymer networks (PPNs) synthetized according to Lopez-Iglesias et al. [24], which were used as fillers of the polymer matrix. A total of 1200 mg of each polymeric matrix was separately dissolved in 10% THF (w/v). The filler (20% (w) of the total mass) was dissolved in 10% (w/v) THF; it was sonicated for 20 min at 30% of maximum amplitude (40 cycles of 20 s sonication followed by 10 s cooling-down) before being mixed with the polymer matrix. This mixture was spread out onto a glass casting plate and subjected to the same heat treatment that was used for making the polymer matrix membrane to remove the solvent. The resulting MMMs were: MMM-HPA, MMM-HPA-PA, and MMM-PA, as described in supporting information (Table S1). In this study, two PPNs were tested (triptycene-isatin, namely PPN-1 and triptycene-trifluoroacetophenone (TFAP), namely PPN-2) [24] and selected as suitable candidates. Nevertheless, after a preliminary evaluation, PPN-2 was chosen for the rest of the study because its corresponding MMMs showed better gas separation properties (as shown in Figure supporting information section, Table S2, and Figure S1).

2.5. Thermal Rearrangement

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> resulting membranes were subjected to a thermal rearrangement (TR) process to obtain β-TR-PBO (pan class="Chemical">polybenzoxazole) membranes in a carbolite split-tube furnace equipped with a quartz tube and using an ultra-high-purity nitrogen flow rate at 900 mL/min, following the Sanders et al. procedure [39]. Figure 4 displays the TR process for the conversion of HPA and HPA-PA to TR-HPA and TR-HPA-PA. Note that PA does not experience any thermal rearrangement. The samples were placed between two ceramic plates separated by stainless steel washers, and they were initially heated at 5 °C/min up to 250 °C and held for 15 min. The second ramp (5 °C/min) increased the temperature up to 375 °C, which was held for 15 min. Finally, samples were cooled to ambient temperature at 10 °C/min and maintained under a nitrogen flow.

Figure 4

Scheme of the synthesis of HPA-PA and conversion to its corresponding TR-HPA-PA.

2.6. Characterization

2.6.1. Polymer Characterization

Weight-average molecular pan class="Chemical">weights (Mw) and number-average molecular weights (Mn) of the polymers synthesized were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using a Tosoh Ecosec HLC-8320GPC (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) device. Samples were prepared by dissolving 0.5 mg of each polymer in 2 mL of THF and filtered through a 0.45 µm filter.

pan class="Chemical">1Hpan> and pan class="Chemical">13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were performed using a Varian AV Agilent (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) working at 400 MHz and 100 MHz. Tpan class="Chemical">he NMR samples were prepared using deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) to dissolve the polymer fibers.

pan class="Chemical">Polymerpan> solubility was determined by placing ~10 mg of tpan class="Chemical">he pan class="Chemical">polymer in 1 mL of the target solvent (N,N-dimethylacetamide, DMAc, N-methylpyrrolidone, NMP, tetrahydrofuane, THF, chloroform, CHCl3, m-cresol, acetone, ethanol, N,N-dimethylformide, DMF) in solubility tubes until its total dilution. If the polymer was not soluble at room temperature, the solution was heated to the boiling point of the solvent, and its solubility checked.

2.6.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan>rmal rearrangement of tpan class="Chemical">he membranes (mass loss and decomposition products) was performed via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using a TA Instruments (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) Q500 thermogravimetric analyzer in 5 mg samples. Ultra-high-purity nitrogen at a flow rate of 40 mL/min in the balance and 50 mL/min in the sample was used. The temperature ramp was set at 10 °C/min up to 800 °C.

2.6.3. DSC

To monitor tpan class="Chemical">hepan> glass transition temperatures (Tg), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was carried out in a TA Instruments DSC Q-20 Analyzer (TA Instruments-pan class="Chemical">Water Corp., Milford, MA, USA). DSC analyses for TR pan class="Chemical">polymers were carried out at a heating rate of 20 °C/min up to 360 °C. In all cases, the experiments were performed under a N2 atmosphere using 6–10 mg of membranes in gas-tight aluminum containers. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined in the second heating cycle from the middle point of the resulting slopes.

2.6.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> conversion of tpan class="Chemical">he resulting membranes to TR-PBO membranes was monitored via attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) using a PerkinElmer Spectrum One FT-IR (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a universal attenuated total reflection (ATR) diamond-tipped sampling module following tpan class="Chemical">he band’s intensity.

2.6.5. Density Measurements

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> fractional free volume (FFV) is defined as:

pan class="Chemical">Hepan>re is tpan class="Chemical">he total specific volume and is tpan class="Chemical">he specific skeletal volume of MMM. The skeletal volume for HPA, PPN, and MMMs can be evaluated from their van der Waals volumes because . Actually, and can be calculated by molecular modeling using the Materials Studio software (BioVia, San Diego, CA, USA). To evaluate , we can use:

This equation correlates specific van der Waals volumes in terms of , tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he fraction of filler (papan>n class="Chemical">PPN). Once is known, we can obtain .

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> total specific volumes can be obtained from tpan class="Chemical">he corresponding densities:

V can be obtained from Equation (2):

Densities were measured by follopan class="Chemical">wing the Archimedes principle in a CP225 Analytical Balance from Sartorius (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) equipped with a density measurement kit. The samples were weighed in air and into high pure isooctane at room temperature. The average density from seven samples was obtained as: where corresponds to the isooctane’s density, Wair to the weight of the sample, and stands for the weight of the sample when submerged in isooctane. Finally, Equation (1) allows the determination of FFV.

2.6.6. WAXS

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> membranes were tested via wide-angle X-ray scattering (pan class="Chemical">WAXS) at room temperature using a Bruker (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) D8 Discover A25 advanced diffractometer equipped with a Goebel mirror. Tpan class="Chemical">he LynxEye detector was operated at a speed of 0.5 s with a step scanning mode ranging from 5° to 70° and a 2θ step of 0.020°. A Cu Kα (λ = 1.542 Å) radiation source in a ceramic tube was used.

2.6.7. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical properties of the polymeric matrixes, MMMs, and their corresponding TR membranes were determined using a Shimadzu Autograph AGS-X 500N tensile testing instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The tensile test was set to 1 mm/min to assess the crosshead speed. Samples were cut using a microtensile dog bone-shaped die before heat treatment. The gauge length and width (~22 mm and 5 mm, respectively) were measured by a digital scanner using ImageJ software to measure the average width and gauge length. Membrane thicknesses were measured by a Mitutoyo digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan) of ±1 µm resolution. Five replicate measurements were carried out for each membrane tested.

2.6.8. Gas Transport: Permeability and Selectivity

Membranes with a uniform thickness were placed on a support of brass disks (using epoxy as adpan class="Chemical">hesive and protected with glass fiber filter paper) to determine gas permeability. This epoxy was dried at room temperature for 3 h followed by 3 h at 60 °C before use. Single gas (except H2) permeability was determined using a constant-volume apparatus, as described elsewpan class="Chemical">here [17]. H2 permeability was measured at tpan class="Chemical">he University of Texas at Austin facilities using a different but similar constant-volume apparatus [40]. All permeability measurements were performed at 35 °C and an upstream pressure of 3 bar.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> dry sample was placed onto tpan class="Chemical">he permeation cell using tpan class="Chemical">he constant-volume variable-pressure method. Gas permeability (cm3 (STP) cm/ (cm2 s cmHg)) was determined by: where V is the downstream volume (cm3) of a permeation system, l is the membrane thickness (cm), p2 is the upstream pressure (cmHg), A is the area available for the gas transport (cm2), the universal gas constant R is 0.278 cmHg cm3/(cm3(STP) K), T is the absolute temperature (K), and (dp1/dt)leak is the steady-state rates of pressure rise (cmHg/s) in the downstream volume. Gas selectivity as:

Samples were kept under vacuum overnight at 35 °C before testing to remove any adsorbed gas. Tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he permeabilities of papan>n class="Chemical">He, H2, O2, N2, CH4, and CO2 (99.999% purity) supplied by Airgas (Airgas, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA) were measured at 3 bars at 35 °C. He permeability was measured at 1, 2, and 3 bars to detect pinholes through the membranes prior to any ulterior membrane testing. All gases were tested before CO2 measurement to prevent membrane plasticization. A vacuum was implemented for at least 20-fold the time lag before measuring the permeability for a new gas.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Properties

3.1.1. Characterization of Polymer Matrixes

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> average molecular weight (Mw) of each pan class="Chemical">polymer was determined to be 163.1, 158.4, and 84.6 kDa for pan class="Disease">HPA, PA, and HPA-PA, respectively.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> solubility of tpan class="Chemical">he pan class="Chemical">polymers herein synthesized was carried out in different solvents. All polymers were soluble in a common organic solvent such as THF and in polar aprotic solvents such as DMAc, NMP, and DMF. None of the polymers synthesized were soluble, neither in CHCl3 nor in ethanol.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> corresponding NMR spectra are shown in tpan class="Chemical">he supporting information (Figures S2–S4).

3.1.2. Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Measurements

Figure 5A shows tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he absorption bands for tpapan>n class="Chemical">he polymeric matrixes used here before any thermal rearrangement, where an O-H vibration band (3200–3500 cm−1) related with the hydroxyl groups and a N-H band related with the amine group are observed. A stretching vibration band for C=O (1638 cm−1) and a N-H symmetric band (1497 cm−1) were also identified.

Figure 5

Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of polymeric matrixes (A), mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) with triptycene-isatin (PPN-1) and triptycene-trifluoroacetophenone (PPN-2) compared with the corresponding polymeric matrix before thermal rearrangement (B), and the polymeric matrix after thermal rearrangement (C).

In Figure 5B, tpan class="Chemical">hepan> stretching vibration band for tpan class="Chemical">he C-F group (~1200 cm−1) was observed, tpan class="Chemical">he presence of this band being typically associated with the filler of the MMMs. According to Lopez-Iglesias et al. [24], this absorption band was related to the PPN-2 filler.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> conversion of tpan class="Chemical">he precursor membranes to β-TR-PBO ones was confirmed by tpan class="Chemical">he presence of C=N stretching oxazole I and C-O-C stretching oxazole II (1475 cm−1 and 1043 cm−1, respectively) absorption bands, which are characteristics of benzoxazoles (Figure 5C).

3.2. Thermal Properties

3.2.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan>rmogravimetric analysis was carried out to elucidate tpan class="Chemical">he characteristics of tpan class="Chemical">he thermal conversion of HPA, HPA-PA, and their corresponding MMMs to β-TR-PBOs materials [18]. The thermal conversion occurs through a cyclization process, obtaining the polybenzoxazole after dehydration. Figure 6 displays the thermograms for HPA and MMM-HPA before and after thermal rearrangement. The corresponding thermograms for PA, MMM-PA, HPA-PA, and MMM-HPA-PA are shown in the supporting information section (Figure S5). In all cases, two common regions of weight loss for the membranes were observed. The first step (in the range from 200 to 400 °C) of weight loss was associated with the thermal rearrangement from polymer matrix moieties to benzoxazole ones, whereas the second step (well above 400 °C) was associated with thermal degradation [18,41,42,43]. Note that polymer degradation occurred above 450 °C in the case of MMMs, which ruled out any potential degradation of the PPNs due to its high thermal resistance (PPN-2 degradation occurred around 490 °C under a N2 atmosphere) [24].

Figure 6

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) thermograms of (left) HPA and (right) MMM-HPA. Samples were heated from 50 to 800 °C at 5 °C/min under a N2 atmosphere.

3.2.2. DSC for Glass Transition Temperatures

DSC spectra carried out to determine tpan class="Chemical">he glass transition temperatures are shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7

Glass transition temperatures for the membranes studied. MMMs include 20% PPN-2.

It is seen that Tg always increased after tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">hermal rearrangement. Note that no tpapan>n class="Chemical">hermal rearrangement process for the PA or MMM-PA membranes is possible. Other tendencies could be estimated from these figures, although they are small and possibly covered by the error ranges. In particular, it seems that before the treatment, addition of PPN-2 has little effect on Tg, except for PA that showed a clear increase of Tg after adding PPN-2. It appears that, in all cases, the presence of the filler decreases Tg after thermal rearrangement.

3.3. Mechanical Properties

Table 1 summarizes tpan class="Chemical">hepan> mechanical property data for pan class="Chemical">MMMs derived from pan class="Chemical">PPN-2; maximum stress, elongation at break, and Young’s modulus. The elongation break was moderate (7.5–10.1%) and comparable for all matrix polymers, MMMs, and their corresponding TR-MMMs, whereas Young’s modulus decreased with the addition of PPN-2 and when subjected to thermal treatment. For instance, Young’s modulus decreased from 2.9 ± 0.2 GPa to 1.7 ± 0.1 GPa with the addition of the filler in HPA and to 1.3 ± 0.1 GPa when thermal treatment was applied. The membranes prepared from HPA polymer exhibited high maximum stress (103.3 ± 4.4 MPa). The addition of 20% PPN-2 induced a decrease in the maximum stress regardless of the membrane tested. Interestingly, thermal rearrangement entailed an increase in the maximum stress.

Table 1

Mechanical properties of HPA, PA, MMMs, and their corresponding thermally rearranged membranes (TR-MMMs).

Membrane	Maximum Stress (MPa)	Elongation at Break (%)	Young’s Modulus (GPa)
HPA	103.3 ± 4.4	9.7 ± 0.4	2.9 ± 0.2
TR-HPA	79.2 ± 9.2	9.2 ± 0.5	1.8 ± 0.3
MMM-HPA	30.5 ± 2.0	9.2 ± 0.7	1.7 ± 0.1
TR-MMM-HPA	37.7 ± 9.9	9.0 ± 0.3	1.2 ± 0.1
PA	89.8 ± 3.8	10.1 ± 0.6	2.4 ± 0.09
MMM-PA	32.2 ± 10.5	7.6 ± 2.8	1.6 ± 0.097
HPA-PA	90.2 ± 14.2	9.974 ± 0.3	2.609 ± 0.3
TR-HPA-PA	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.
MMM-HPA-PA	37.4 ± 5.2	9.648 ± 0.4	1.907 ± 0.2
TR-MMM-HPA-PA	43.96 ± 8.00	9.778 ± 0.2	1.475 ± 0.1

3.4. Gas Separation Properties

In a preliminary study, as shown in tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he supporting information section (Table S2 and Figure S1), it was observed that tpapan>n class="Chemical">he MMMs and TR-MMMs derived from PPN-1 showed worse gas separation properties than those derived from PPN-2, and thus, PPN-2 was selected as the filler employed for further characterization.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> values of permeabilities of tpan class="Chemical">he pure gases (pan class="Species">H2, N2, O2, CH4, and CO2) of the precursors, MMMs, and TR-MMMs materials, derived from PPN-2, are displayed in Table 2.

Table 2

Pure gas permeabilities using PPN-2 as filler.

Membrane	Permeabilities (Barrer 1)
	H2	N2	O2	CH4	CO2
Non-TR materials
HPA	40.84	0.43	2.64	0.26	10.54
MMM-HPA	166.02	3.48	18.46	2.65	79.0
PA	76.14	2.42	10.85	2.46	51.23
MMM-PA	168.65	6.15	27.02	6.12	128.7
HPA-PA	45.65	0.82	4.44	0.65	19.18
MMM-HPA-PA	139.8	3.26	16.92	2.77	73.55
TR materials
TR-HPA	122.9	4.07	16.71	4.06	78.8
TR-MMM-HPA	271.5	10.10	43.15	10.29	200.38
TR-HPA-PA	203.7	7.43	32.17	7.29	142.1
TR-MMM-HPA-PA	518.6	20.65	87.97	20.80	394.16

1 Barrer = 10−10 cm3 (STP) cm/cm2 s cmHg or, in SI units, 1 Barrer = 3.35 × 10−16 (mol m)/(m2 s Pa).

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan>rmal rearrangement of tpan class="Chemical">he pan class="Disease">HPA caused a remarkable increase in gas permeability regardless of the gas tested, with values increasing 5-, 17-, 12-, 7-, and 13.5-fold for H2, N2, O2, CH4, and CO2, respectively, compared to the non-TR polymeric matrix. The permeabilities of H2, N2, O2, CH4, and CO2 notably increased with the addition of 20% PPN-2 to the polymeric matrix by a factor of 4.0–10.2 for HPA, 2.2–2.5 for PA, 3.1–4.3 for the HPA-PA copolymer, and 2.5–2.8 for TR-HPA. Overall, the largest increase in permeability was observed for CH4 and CO2. Moreover, the permeabilities of all the gases studied are always ordered according to their kinetic diameters.

pan class="Chemical">MMMspan>’ gas transport properties are known to be strongly determined by tpan class="Chemical">he morphology of tpan class="Chemical">he interface [13]. This morphology, in turn, could be caused, at least partially, by the fact that the polymer networks herein used contained solvent inside their pores, and the removal of this solvent from both the matrix and the filler could not be wholly effective. Despite that this could also limit the total polymer conversion to PBO, this phenomenon was not observed for TR-MMMs since the solvent was completely eliminated during the TR process, and therefore, their gas separation properties present lower variability in terms of permeability and selectivity. In any case, heat treatment might be optimized to maximize the rate of solvent removal/conversion to PBO.

It is worth noting that pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">MMMs derived from PA exhibited tpapan>n class="Chemical">he best gas separation performance for all tested gases.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> most important improvement in gas permeabilities was recorded for TR-pan class="Chemical">MMMs, particularly for those manufactured from pan class="Disease">HPA. Several investigations have attributed the effect of the filler on permeability (increase) and on selectivity (slight decrease) to the high permeability provided by the poor packing of the polymer chains in MMMs [17,39,44,45]. Likewise, Park et al. reported that diffusivity significantly impacted gas transport in TR membranes as a result of their high free volume fraction, which is typically associated with microporous structures appearing as a consequence of the subsequent rearrangement [46]. The slight decrease of selectivity linked to the addition of the filler has been attributed to poor polymer-filler adhesion [47].

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> 1991 and 2008 Robeson upper bound plots [48,49] for tpan class="Chemical">he pan class="Chemical">O2/N2 and CO2/CH4 gas pairs are shown in Figure 8. Note that some results reach the 1991 Robeson’s upper bound.

Figure 8

Permeability-selectivity Robeson’s plot for the O2/N2 pair (left) and the CH4/CO2 pair (right).

In Figure 9, tpan class="Chemical">hepan> corresponding Robeson’s plots are shown for H2/pan class="Chemical">CH4 and pan class="Species">H2/N2. These pairs show the better permeability versus selectivity behavior with some results over the 1991 Robeson’s trade-off line and close to the 2008 line.

Figure 9

Permeability-selectivity Robeson’s plot for the H2/CH4 (left) and H2/N2 (right) gas pairs.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> slightly worse selectivity versus permeability results for tpan class="Chemical">he H2/pan class="Chemical">CO2 pair are shown in Figure 10. Note that the earlier upper bound relationship for H2/CO2 was published in 1994 [50].

Figure 10

Permeability-selectivity Robeson’s plot for the H2/CH4 (left) and H2/N2 (right) gas pairs.

Tpan class="Chemical">hepan> best gas transport properties were recorded for tpan class="Chemical">he TR-pan class="Chemical">MMMs derived from the blend of HPA, supplemented with 20% of PPN-2, which exceeded the Robeson limit 1991 for the H2/CH4 and H2/N2 gas pairs. Thus, it reached the 1991 upper bound for O2/N2 and CO2/CH4 only after thermal rearrangement. On the contrary, it does not reach the 1994 upper bound, not even after thermal rearrangement for H2/CO2. A significant increase in CO2 permeabilities compared to the MMMs without thermal rearrangement was observed for the TR-MMMs, which exhibited an excellent CO2 affinity leading to the high solubility of this gas within the polymer matrix, thus obtaining a superior gas transport [51].

3.5. Morphology of the MMMs

3.5.1. Density and Fractional Free Volume (FFV)

Because permeability can be written as (tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he product of solubility S and diffusivity D) and D depends on tpapan>n class="Chemical">he fraction of free volume, we will call to easy notation, as , as shown by Thornton et al. [52]:

It can be assumed that this equation holds wpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">hen solubility is almost independent of FFV (f) or depends, like diffusivity, exponentially on f. Several models based on a reasonable linear dependence of tpapan>n class="Chemical">he diffusion activation energy with the transversal area of the penetrant admit a quadratic dependence of β with the kinetic diameter, d [52,53,54]:

Combining Equations (8) and (9), we get:

Figure 11 shows P versus f and β as a function of dk for tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he membranes containing papan>n class="Chemical">PPN-2, showing suitable accordance with Equations (9) and (10). Here the kinetic diameters are given by Breck [53,55].

Figure 11

Permeability-selectivity Robeson’s plot for the H2/CH4 (left) and H2/N2 (right) gas pairs.

3.5.2. WAXD Intersegmental Distance

Figure 12 shows tpan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">he papan>n class="Chemical">WAXD spectra for HPA materials, without and with PPN-2, before and after thermal rearrangement.

Figure 12

WAX spectra for HPA (left) and amplification of the corresponding peaks (right).

In Figure 13, tpan class="Chemical">hepan> permeability of pan class="Chemical">hydrogen is shown as a function of tpan class="Chemical">he most probable intersegmental distance (δ) as evaluated by WAX. It is clearly seen there that the thermal rearrangement process and addition of PPN-2 increase the intersegmental distance and permeability. The addition of PPN-2 causes small increases in δ but causes a relatively large change in permeability. Both permeability and δ are lower for the copolymer. Note that for a similar system, we found [17] an opposite trend. Then, a decrease of δ was recorded when increasing amounts of PPN were loaded (with simultaneous increase of permeability). This was probably due to a stronger effect of the filler on the structure of the polymeric matrix, causing its compaction with the appearance of transport paths attributable to flaws and intercommunicated interstices.

Figure 13

Hydrogen permeability as a function of the most probable intersegmental distance as evaluated by WAX.

4. Conclusions

A set of an o-hydroxypolyamide (HPA), produced by reaction of 2,2-bis(3-amino-4-hydroxyphenyl)-hexafluoropropane (APAF) diamine and 5′-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-4,4′′-dicarboxylic diacid chloride (tBTpCl), a copolymer (HPA-PA) combining APAF and 6FpDA (1/1 mol/mol%) was also produced by reaction with tBTpCl, and finally a polyamide (PA) derived from with tBTpCl and 4,4′-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) (6FpDA), without o-hydroxy moieties, were obtained and thoroughly characterized. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) produced from HPA, HPA-PA, and PA employing 20% w/w of two porous polymer networks (PPNs) (triptycene-Isatin PPN-1 and triptycene-trifluoroacetophenone, PPN-2) were obtained. It was observed, in a preliminary gas separation study, that the best gas separation results were observed for the MMMs produced from PPN-2, and consequently, it was chosen as the only PPN load.

In addition, tpan class="Chemical">hepan> pan class="Chemical">polymer membranes and tpan class="Chemical">heir corresponding MMMs were thermally treated to temperatures around 350 °C in order to produce the thermal rearrangement of the o-hydroxypolyamide moieties to benzoxazole ones.

All tpan class="Chemical">hepan> membranes showed suitable mechanical properties able to withstand tpan class="Chemical">he pressures employed in gas separation applications.

Gas separation properties have been tested for pan class="Species">H2, N2, O2, CH4, and CO2. Thermal rearrangement and the addition of porous polymer networks increased permeability with a slight decrease in selectivity for all gas pairs studied. Remarkably, good results have been obtained for the H2/CH4 and H2/N2 pairs. In both cases, results approached the 2008 Robeson’s limit line. The evaluation for the O2/N2 and CO2/CH4 gas pairs provided worse results even though some results reached the 1991 Robeson’s upper bound. In all cases, the HPA-PA copolymer membranes provided intermediate results in between those observed for HPA and PA membranes.

Finally, intrachain characteristic lengths (WAXD) and tpan class="Chemical">he fraction of free volume (FFV) of the membrane, along with their kinetic diameters, were very useful to understand permeability values. It has been shown that thermal rearrangement and/or the addition of PPN-2 increased the intersegmental distance and, consequently, permeability. The presence of PPN-2 increased the intersegmental distance slightly with a relatively high increase in permeability. Permeability has been shown to follow an exponential dependence with free volume and a quadratic function with the kinetic diameter of the gas.