Literature DB >> 33803345

Comparative Analysis of CREB3 and CREB3L2 Protein Expression in HEK293 Cells.

Kentaro Oh-Hashi1,2,3, Ayumi Yamamoto3, Ryoichi Murase3, Yoko Hirata1,2,3.   

Abstract

We performed a comparative analysis of two ER-resident CREB3 family proteins, CREB3 and CREB3L2, in HEK293 cells using pharmacological and genome editing approaches and identified several differences between the two. Treatment with brefeldin A (BFA) and monensin induced the cleavage of full-length CREB3 and CREB3L2; however, the level of the full-length CREB3 protein, but not CREB3L2 protein, was not noticeably reduced by the monensin treatment. On the other hand, treatment with tunicamycin (Tm) shifted the molecular weight of the full-length CREB3L2 protein downward but abolished CREB3 protein expression. Thapsigargin (Tg) significantly increased the expression of only full-length CREB3L2 protein concomitant with a slight increase in the level of its cleaved form. Treatment with cycloheximide and MG132 revealed that both endogenous CREB3 and CREB3L2 are proteasome substrates. In addition, kifunensine, an α-mannosidase inhibitor, significantly increased the levels of both full-length forms. Consistent with these findings, cells lacking SEL1L, a crucial ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) component, showed increased expression of both full-length CREB3 and CREB3L2; however, cycloheximide treatment downregulated full-length CREB3L2 protein expression more rapidly in SEL1L-deficient cells than the full-length CREB3 protein. Finally, we investigated the induction of the expression of several CREB3 and CREB3L2 target genes by Tg and BFA treatments and SEL1L deficiency. In conclusion, this study suggests that both endogenous full-length CREB3 and CREB3L2 are substrates for ER-associated protein degradation but are partially regulated by distinct mechanisms, each of which contributes to unique cellular responses that are distinct from canonical ER signals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CREB3; CREB3L2; ERAD; SEL1L

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803345      PMCID: PMC7967177          DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  47 in total

1.  Two distinct stress signaling pathways converge upon the CHOP promoter during the mammalian unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Yanjun Ma; Joseph W Brewer; J Alan Diehl; Linda M Hendershot
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  SEL1L and HRD1 are involved in the degradation of unassembled secretory Ig-mu chains.

Authors:  Monica Cattaneo; Mieko Otsu; Claudio Fagioli; Simone Martino; Lavinia Vittoria Lotti; Roberto Sitia; Ida Biunno
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  Activation of OASIS family, ER stress transducers, is dependent on its stabilization.

Authors:  S Kondo; S-I Hino; A Saito; S Kanemoto; N Kawasaki; R Asada; S Izumi; H Iwamoto; M Oki; H Miyagi; M Kaneko; Y Nomura; F Urano; K Imaizumi
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  F-box and WD repeat domain-containing-7 (Fbxw7) protein targets endoplasmic reticulum-anchored osteogenic and chondrogenic transcriptional factors for degradation.

Authors:  Kanae Yumimoto; Masaki Matsumoto; Ichiro Onoyama; Kazunori Imaizumi; Keiichi I Nakayama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor.

Authors:  H Yoshida; T Matsui; A Yamamoto; T Okada; K Mori
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-12-28       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Wolfram syndrome 1 gene negatively regulates ER stress signaling in rodent and human cells.

Authors:  Sonya G Fonseca; Shinsuke Ishigaki; Christine M Oslowski; Simin Lu; Kathryn L Lipson; Rajarshi Ghosh; Emiko Hayashi; Hisamitsu Ishihara; Yoshitomo Oka; M Alan Permutt; Fumihiko Urano
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  In vitro reconstitution of ER-stress induced ATF6 transport in COPII vesicles.

Authors:  Adam J Schindler; Randy Schekman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The CrebA/Creb3-like transcription factors are major and direct regulators of secretory capacity.

Authors:  Rebecca M Fox; Caitlin D Hanlon; Deborah J Andrew
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Golgi stress-induced transcriptional changes mediated by MAPK signaling and three ETS transcription factors regulate MCL1 splicing.

Authors:  Jan Baumann; Tatiana I Ignashkova; Sridhar R Chirasani; Silvia Ramírez-Peinado; Hamed Alborzinia; Mathieu Gendarme; Kyra Kuhnigk; Valentin Kramer; Ralph K Lindemann; Jan H Reiling
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  2 in total

1.  Expression analysis and functional characterization of thioredoxin domain-containing protein 11.

Authors:  Ryoichi Murase; Ayumi Yamamoto; Yoko Hirata; Kentaro Oh-Hashi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  Nutrient Regulation of Pancreatic Islet β-Cell Secretory Capacity and Insulin Production.

Authors:  Kristen E Rohli; Cierra K Boyer; Sandra E Blom; Samuel B Stephens
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.