Literature DB >> 33803314

The Carbon Footprint of Marathon Runners: Training and Racing.

Laurent Castaignède1, Frederic Veny2, Johnathan Edwards2, Véronique Billat2,3,4.   

Abstract

Marathon running leaves a significant carbon footprint regarding CO2 emissions; for example, 37 percent of New York Marathon participants travel internationally to New York. The aim of this study is to estimate the CO2 footprint of a person training and competing in a marathon; we will also propose methods to minimize the CO2 footprint because of transportation. In addition, we also examine the influence of food practices and hygiene on training and racing a marathon.
METHODS: We estimated the annual carbon footprint of one person taking part in a marathon. We considered all training, racing, and travelling (local and international) for one person (we are going to give him the first name of "Henri"), and then compared his CO2 footprint with his colleagues playing tennis and soccer. The excess CO2 footprint whilst running and for shoes, clothing, books, magazines, insurance, travel, hygiene, laundry, and resources for electronics and additional food consumed were calculated. For competitions, we estimated and compared the CO2 emission from transportation to national vs. international marathon (New York).
RESULTS: We estimated that our runner emitted 4.3 tons of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), including all greenhouse gases. A transatlantic flight to New York corresponded to 3.5 tons CO2, which is 83% of the annual carbon footprint of an average French citizen which is about 11 tons CO2e/year. This leads to a sudden 40% increase in Henri's annual carbon footprint.
CONCLUSIONS: By focusing on the additional carbon footprint from one year of marathon training and racing, and traveling locally versus internationally, this sport still has a potentially significant carbon footprint that runners and race organizers ought to consider. We wanted to answer a growing question of marathon runners who are wondering about the carbon footprint of their sports practice in following with a new environmentalist trend that considers not traveling anymore to participate in marathons and to stay local. However, the representativeness in the selection of calculation objectives is very low. There is no need for statistics since this study is a theoretical simulation of traditional training and competition practices of marathon runners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon calculator; carbon emissions; carbon impact; environmental impact of sport

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803314      PMCID: PMC7967273          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  10 in total

Review 1.  The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study.

Authors:  L D Frank; J F Sallis; B E Saelens; L Leary; K Cain; T L Conway; P M Hess
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport.

Authors:  James Woodcock; Phil Edwards; Cathryn Tonne; Ben G Armstrong; Olu Ashiru; David Banister; Sean Beevers; Zaid Chalabi; Zohir Chowdhury; Aaron Cohen; Oscar H Franco; Andy Haines; Robin Hickman; Graeme Lindsay; Ishaan Mittal; Dinesh Mohan; Geetam Tiwari; Alistair Woodward; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Is there such a thing as sustainable physical activity?

Authors:  H B Bjørnarå; M K Torstveit; T H Stea; E Bere
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Determination of Submaximal and Maximal Training Zones From a 3-Stage, Variable-Duration, Perceptually Regulated Track Test.

Authors:  Claire A Molinari; Florent Palacin; Luc Poinsard; Véronique L Billat
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 4.010

Review 5.  Survival of the fittest: VO2max, a key predictor of longevity?

Authors:  Barbara Strasser; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: a controlled longitudinal study.

Authors:  Christian Brand; Anna Goodman; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Appl Energy       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 9.746

Review 7.  What are the health benefits of active travel? A systematic review of trials and cohort studies.

Authors:  Lucinda E Saunders; Judith M Green; Mark P Petticrew; Rebecca Steinbach; Helen Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Health Impacts of Active Transportation in Europe.

Authors:  David Rojas-Rueda; Audrey de Nazelle; Zorana J Andersen; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Jan Bruha; Hana Bruhova-Foltynova; Hélène Desqueyroux; Corinne Praznoczy; Martina S Ragettli; Marko Tainio; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Greenhouse gas emissions as a result of spectators travelling to football in England.

Authors:  Adekunle Dosumu; Ian Colbeck; Rachel Bragg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Fuelling walking and cycling: human powered locomotion is associated with non-negligible greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Anja Mizdrak; Linda J Cobiac; Christine L Cleghorn; Alistair Woodward; Tony Blakely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.