Literature DB >> 33803265

Detection of Myocardial Infarction Using ECG and Multi-Scale Feature Concatenate.

Jia-Zheng Jian1, Tzong-Rong Ger1, Han-Hua Lai1, Chi-Ming Ku1, Chiung-An Chen2, Patricia Angela R Abu3, Shih-Lun Chen4.   

Abstract

Diverse computer-aided diagnosis systems based on convolutional neural networks were applied to automate the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) found in electrocardiogram (ECG) for early diagnosis and prevention. However, issues, particularly overfitting and underfitting, were not being taken into account. In other words, it is unclear whether the network structure is too simple or complex. Toward this end, the proposed models were developed by starting with the simplest structure: a multi-lead features-concatenate narrow network (N-Net) in which only two convolutional layers were included in each lead branch. Additionally, multi-scale features-concatenate networks (MSN-Net) were also implemented where larger features were being extracted through pooling the signals. The best structure was obtained via tuning both the number of filters in the convolutional layers and the number of inputting signal scales. As a result, the N-Net reached a 95.76% accuracy in the MI detection task, whereas the MSN-Net reached an accuracy of 61.82% in the MI locating task. Both networks give a higher average accuracy and a significant difference of p < 0.001 evaluated by the U test compared with the state-of-the-art. The models are also smaller in size thus are suitable to fit in wearable devices for offline monitoring. In conclusion, testing throughout the simple and complex network structure is indispensable. However, the way of dealing with the class imbalance problem and the quality of the extracted features are yet to be discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; classifiers; convolution neural network (CNN); electrocardiography; k-fold validation; myocardial infarction; sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803265      PMCID: PMC7967244          DOI: 10.3390/s21051906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  23 in total

1.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Classification of myocardial infarction based on hybrid feature extraction and artificial intelligence tools by adopting tunable-Q wavelet transform (TQWT), variational mode decomposition (VMD) and neural networks.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Jian Yuan; Chengzhi Yuan; Qinghui Wang; Fenglin Liu; Ying Wang
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Wayne Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Characterizing nonlinear heartbeat dynamics within a point process framework.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Emery N Brown; Riccardo Barbieri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Variability of the electrocardiogram in normal young men.

Authors:  E SIMONSON; J BROZEK; A KEYS
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Towards End-to-End ECG Classification With Raw Signal Extraction and Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Sean Shensheng Xu; Man-Wai Mak; Chi-Chung Cheung
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.772

Review 7.  Opportunities and challenges of deep learning methods for electrocardiogram data: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shenda Hong; Yuxi Zhou; Junyuan Shang; Cao Xiao; Jimeng Sun
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  Real-Time Multilead Convolutional Neural Network for Myocardial Infarction Detection.

Authors:  Wenhan Liu; Mengxin Zhang; Yidan Zhang; Yuan Liao; Qijun Huang; Sheng Chang; Hao Wang; Jin He
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.772

9.  A Power-Efficient Multiband Planar USB Dongle Antenna for Wireless Sensor Networks.

Authors:  Wei-Yuan Chiang; Chia-Hao Ku; Chiung-An Chen; Le-Yu Wang; Patricia Angela R Abu; Pei-Zong Rao; Chih-Kai Liu; Chao-Hsiang Liao; Shih-Lun Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold.

Authors:  Ivaylo I Christov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Deep Learning for Detecting and Locating Myocardial Infarction by Electrocardiogram: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Ping Xiong; Simon Ming-Yuen Lee; Ging Chan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-25

2.  A Robustness Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for ECG Myocardial Infarction Detection.

Authors:  Mohamed Sraitih; Younes Jabrane; Amir Hajjam El Hassani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.