Literature DB >> 33803264

Evaluation of Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Urban Riverfront Space Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study of the Fenghe River, Xi'an, China.

Zhicheng Zhang1, Hongjuan Zhang2, Juan Feng1, Yirong Wang1, Kang Liu1,3.   

Abstract

Urban riverfront space has diversified ecosystem services, but due to excessive changes in the geographical environment, such as drastic changes in land use, people gain social value at a great ecological cost. Obtaining benefits from the ecosystem in this way is not sustainable. Therefore, this paper uses the SolVES model to evaluate the social value of ecosystem services on the east bank of the Fenghe River, while also studying the contribution of different environmental variables to social value. The main results are as follows. (1) Environmental variables affect the spatial distribution characteristics of social value. The distance to water (DTW) means the social value was distributed in strips, and the distance to road (DTR) concentrated the social value along the road. The landscape type (LT) means the social value was concentrated in the landscape space. (2) When DTW, DTR, and LT were collectively used as environmental variables, the distribution characteristics of various social values were similar to when LT was used as the only environmental variable. (3) The results of MaxEnt show that LT made a greater contribution to the aesthetic, recreation, therapeutic, and historic values, and was the largest contribution factor to the aesthetic, therapeutic, and historic values, with contribution rates of 47.6, 50.5, and 80.0%, respectively. DTW is the factor that contributed the most to recreation, with a contribution rate of 43.1%. Improving social value based on the influence and contribution of environmental variables can reduce the damage to the ecological environment caused by changes in geographic factors. This is sustainable for both the ecosystem and the services it provides to mankind.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SolVES model; environmental variables; landscape space; participatory mapping

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803264      PMCID: PMC7967293          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  7 in total

Review 1.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.

Authors:  Elena M Bennett; Garry D Peterson; Line J Gordon
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 2.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  [Assessment of the social values of ecosystem services based on SolVES model: A case study of Wusong Paotaiwan Wetland Forest Park, Shanghai, China.]

Authors:  Yu Wang; Bi Tian Fu; Yong Peng Lyu; Kai Yang; Yue Che
Journal:  Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao       Date:  2016-06

4.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.

Authors:  Stephen R Carpenter; Harold A Mooney; John Agard; Doris Capistrano; Ruth S Defries; Sandra Díaz; Thomas Dietz; Anantha K Duraiappah; Alfred Oteng-Yeboah; Henrique Miguel Pereira; Charles Perrings; Walter V Reid; José Sarukhan; Robert J Scholes; Anne Whyte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Surface potential effects on metal ion binding to phosphatidylcholine membranes 31P NMR study of lanthanide and calcium ion binding to egg-yolk lecithin vesicles.

Authors:  H Grasdalen; L E Göran Eriksson; J Westman; A Ehrenberg
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1977-09-05

6.  More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in land-use change in Europe.

Authors:  Joachim Maes; Ana Barbosa; Claudia Baranzelli; Grazia Zulian; Filipe Batista E Silva; Ine Vandecasteele; Roland Hiederer; Camino Liquete; Maria Luisa Paracchini; Sarah Mubareka; Chris Jacobs-Crisioni; Carolina Perpiña Castillo; Carlo Lavalle
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.848

7.  National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review.

Authors:  Matthias Schröter; Christian Albert; Alexandra Marques; Wolke Tobon; Sandra Lavorel; Joachim Maes; Claire Brown; Stefan Klotz; Aletta Bonn
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 8.589

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.