| Literature DB >> 33803105 |
Nallely Solano-Alvarez1, Juan Antonio Valencia-Hernández1, Enrique Rico-García1, Irineo Torres-Pacheco1, Rosalía Virginia Ocampo-Velázquez1, Eleazar Máximo Escamilla-Silva2, Ana Luz Romero-García3, Ángel G Alpuche-Solís3, Ramón Gerardo Guevara-González1.
Abstract
The need to produce food in a sustainable way to counteract the effects of excessive use of agrochemicals opens the door to the generation of new technologies that are not based on fossil fuels and are less toxic to ecosystems. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) could represent an alternative to chemical biofertilizers and pesticides offering protection for biotic and <Entities:
Keywords: PGPB; bacterial canker; crop protection
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803105 PMCID: PMC8001772 DOI: 10.3390/plants10030506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Phosphates solubilization activity of B. cereus “Amazcala”. As positive control of phosphate solubilization (Control, C), a Bacillus subtilis commercial strain with this property was used (see methods). Different letters in each bar indicates significant difference according to Tukey test (p = 0.05). The results are the average of two independent experiments (n = 3, total in two experiments n = 6).
Figure 2Effect of two colony-forming units (CFU) levels of B. cereus “Amazcala” on tomato performance. Panel A, Dry weight; Panel B, Stem width; Panel C, Plant height; Panel D, Chlorophyll levels as SPAD units. Simbology: C, control plants no-treated with B. cereus Amazcala; B.c-A, B. cereus Amazcala tested at 1 × 104 CFU mL−1 (C1) or at 1 × 108 CFU mL−1 (C2), respectively. Different letters in each bar for each panel indicates significant difference according to Tukey test (p = 0.05). The results are the average of two independent experiments (n = 6 for each experiment, total in two experiments n = 12).
Figure 3Stress-response enzyme activities in tomato plants treated with B. cereus “Amazcala”. Panel A, superoxide dismutase (SOD); Panel B, catalase (CAT); Panel C, phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL). Simbology: C, Control plants mean plant non-treated with the bacterium; B.c-A, plants treated with B. cereus Amazcala. Different letters in each bar for each enzyme activity indicates significant difference according to Tukey test (p = 0.5). The results are the average of 2 independent experiments (n = 3, total in two experiments n = 6).
Figure 4Relative gene expression of chalcone synthase (chs) and pathogenesis-related protein-1a (pr-1a). Different letters in each bar indicates significant difference according to Tukey test (p = 0.05). The results are the average of two independent experiments (n = 3, in total n = 6). Control plants mean plant non-treated with the bacterium.
Figure 5Size of the inhibition zone in the in vitro antagonistic tests of B. cereus Amazcala against 3 isolates of Cmm. Panel A, against isolate sp; Panel B, against isolate AcR42; Panel C, against isolate 1565. B.c-A was grown on Luria Bertani (LB) or minimal M9 medium (MM). As positive control against Cmm, a commercial product (Qbacter, Qb) was evaluated. Different letters in each bar for each panel indicates significant difference according to Tukey test (p = 0.05). The results are the average of three independent experiments (n = 3 for each experiment, total in three experiments n = 9).
Figure 6Plant height (Panel A) and severity (Panel B) of bacterial canker disease at 30 days post-inoculation in tomato plants treated with Cmm and/or B. cereus Amazcala under greenhouse conditions. As positive chemical control of bacterial canker, a commercial product (Terra-Cu-Oxymet) was evaluated. Control in panel A refers to plants inoculated only with B. cereus Amazcala. Simbology: C, Control; Tcu+O, Terra-Cu-Oxymet + Cmm AcR42; AcR42, Cmm isolate AcR42; Bc-A, B.cereus-Amazcala. Different letters in each bar indicate significant difference according to Tukey test in panel A, and Kruskal–Wallis H test in panel B, using in both tests a significance of p = 0.05. The results are the average of 2 independent experiments (n = 9 for each experiment, total in two experiments n = 18).
Figure 7Typical symptoms of the tomato plants preventively treated with B. cereus Amazcala and infected with Cmm AcR42. C (-), negative control treated neither with B. cereus Amazcala nor Cmm Ac42; Cmm AcR42, plant treated only with phytopathogenic Cmm AcR42.