Literature DB >> 33803014

Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey.

Alexander G Mathioudakis1,2, Murad Ghrew3,4,5, Andrew Ustianowski5,6, Shazaad Ahmad7, Ray Borrow8, Lida Pieretta Papavasileiou9, Dimitrios Petrakis10, Nawar Diar Bakerly3,11.   

Abstract

An online survey was conducted to compare the safety, tolerability and reactogenicity of available COVID-19 vaccines in different recipient groups. This survey was launched in February 2021 and ran for 11 days. Recipients of a first COVID-19 vaccine dose ≥7 days prior to survey completion were eligible. The incidence and severity of vaccination side effects were assessed. The survey was completed by 2002 respondents of whom 26.6% had a prior COVID-19 infection. A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of any side effect (risk ratio 1.08, 95% confidence intervals (1.05-1.11)), fever (2.24 (1.86-2.70)), breathlessness (2.05 (1.28-3.29)), flu-like illness (1.78 (1.51-2.10)), fatigue (1.34 (1.20-1.49)) and local reactions (1.10 (1.06-1.15)). It was also associated with an increased risk of severe side effects leading to hospital care (1.56 (1.14-2.12)). While mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of any side effect (1.06 (1.01-1.11)) compared with viral vector-based vaccines, these were generally milder (p < 0.001), mostly local reactions. Importantly, mRNA vaccine recipients reported a considerably lower incidence of systemic reactions (RR < 0.6) including anaphylaxis, swelling, flu-like illness, breathlessness and fatigue and of side effects requiring hospital care (0.42 (0.31-0.58)). Our study confirms the findings of recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating that COVID-19 vaccines are generally safe with limited severe side effects. For the first time, our study links prior COVID-19 illness with an increased incidence of vaccination side effects and demonstrates that mRNA vaccines cause milder, less frequent systemic side effects but more local reactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccine; Coronavirus Disease 2019; adverse events; reactogenicity; safety; tolerability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803014      PMCID: PMC8002738          DOI: 10.3390/life11030249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-1729


1. Introduction

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) rapidly became a leading cause of death and short and long-term morbidity among people over the age of 45 [1,2], posing an unprecedented burden to healthcare systems with worldwide economic consequences and prolonged lockdowns [3]. Vaccines currently being rolled out are anticipated to significantly modify these trends. While their effectiveness and safety have been proven in recent studies [4,5,6], data in specific groups remain lacking. Generally, people with a previous history of COVID-19 in whom vaccination is currently advised [7] were excluded from the clinical trials [4,5,6]. Whilst it is accepted that prior infection with COVID-19 induces a natural immunity potentially lasting for at least six months [8], it is unknown if previous infection may be associated with a greater number of vaccination side effects. Moreover, the safety and reactogenicity of the different types of vaccines (mRNA or viral vector-based) have not been compared head-to-head. This anonymized online survey was conducted to compare the safety profiles of available COVID-19 vaccines and evaluate their side effects in different groups of vaccine recipients.

2. Materials and Methods

This online survey, developed in plain English language and piloted by experts and lay people, captured basic epidemiological data, details on COVID-19 exposure, vaccination history and the incidence and severity of the respective side effects (Appendix A: Table A1). More specifically, we enquired about the following symptoms: localized reactions (pain, swelling, tenderness, redness, itching or other), fever, skin rash, shortness of breath, tingling in the mouth, face, body/extremities, swelling in the face or mouth, generalized swelling, anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction with face swelling and breathlessness), tiredness or fatigue, flu-like illness or any other side effects. It was launched via Google Forms on 3 February 2021 for 11 days and was shared within the institutions of the investigators through professional contacts and social media. The only inclusion criterion was the receipt of the first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine at least seven days prior to survey completion.
Table A1

Definitions of the severity of side effects.

SeverityDefinition
Minimal Negligible impact
Mild No treatment needed
Moderate Needed treatment or advice from healthcare professional outside the hospital
Severe Needed hospital care
The main objectives were to evaluate the differences in the incidence and severity of vaccination side effects among (i) people with versus without previously reported COVID-19 infection and (ii) those who received different vaccine types. Moreover, we explored the differences in self-reported side effects between the first and second vaccine dose among different ethnicities and among those with different preconceptions toward the vaccine. Finally, we explored the impact of the interval between COVID-19 exposure and vaccination and the incidence of side effects. For our main analysis, a positive COVID-19 history was considered in cases of (a) a self-reported history of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 disease provided that COVID-19 was not excluded by a negative PCR test, (b) a positive COVID-19 PCR test or (c) a positive COVID-19 antigen test. In a sensitivity analysis, a COVID-19 infection was only considered valid if it was confirmed by PCR or antigen testing while patients with an uncertain exposure (clinical history not confirmed by laboratory testing) were excluded. Between group differences were assessed using chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively, after a Shapiro–Wilk test excluded the normal distribution of the latter. Between group differences in the incidence of side effects are presented as risk ratios (RR) with the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Predictors of the incidence and severity of side effects were evaluated in univariate followed by multivariate binomial logistic regression and cumulative link models for ordinal data, respectively. Age, gender, ethnicity, vaccine type, prophylactic analgesia or other medication use prior to vaccination, vaccine preconceptions and prior COVID-19 exposure were evaluated as potential confounding factors. Unless otherwise specified, the analyses were based on side effect profiles from the first dose of the vaccine. Ethics approval was not necessary for this anonymized survey.

3. Results

Within 11 days, this online survey was completed by 2002 participants (Table A2, Figure A1), mostly health professionals of a working age (median: 45, interquartile range [IQR]: 35–50 years). A total of 532 (26.6%) had a history of a previous COVID-19 infection of whom 366 (68.8%) were confirmed by PCR (n = 273) and/or antigen testing (n = 162). A COVID-19 infection preceded the first vaccination dose by a median of 87 (IQR: 47–223) days. The majority of respondents were Caucasians (88.3%) mostly from the UK (78.6%) and Greece (16.6%). As anticipated, a prior history of a COVID-19 infection was more prevalent among frontline workers, health professionals and people from the UK where a very high incidence of COVID-19 was documented [9]. Moreover, recipients of a viral vector-based vaccine (mainly the AstraZeneca vaccine) were relatively older (Figure A2, p < 0.001) and were mostly based in the UK (89.7% compared with 76.4% of those that received viral mRNA vaccines, p < 0.001). Finally, doctors were more likely to have received an mRNA-based vaccine compared with the other groups (p < 0.001).
Table A2

Baseline characteristics of the study participants. Continuous variables are presented as medians (IQR) and categorical as n (%). Between group differences were anticipated and explained by the incidence of COVID-19 in different subgroups. Characteristically, a higher incidence of a prior COVID-19 infection was observed among frontline workers, health professionals and among British people (a very high incidence of COVID-19 was documented in the UK).

CharacteristicsParticipants with a Prior COVID-19 Infection(n = 532)Participants with No Known Prior COVID-19 Infection(n = 1470)Missing DataBetween Group Differences(p-Value)
Gender (Female) 393 (73.9%)1051 (71.5%)0.7%NS
Age ≥ 60 (%) * 56 (10.5%)202 (13.7%)0.5%NS
Weight (kg) 75 (64–88)74 (64–85)4.0%NS
Height (cm) 168 (163–173)168 (162–175)2.2%NS
Country 0.6%<0.001
Europe
UK472 (88.7%)1100 (74.8%)
Greece38 (7.1%)294 (20%)
Other European countries10 (1.9%)30 (2.0%)
Americas5 (0.9%)17 (1.2%)
Asia5 (0.9%)17 (1.2%)
Africa0 (0%)1 (0.1%)
Ethnicity 1.8%NS
White464 (87.2%)1303 (88.6%)
Asian35 (6.6%)63 (4.3%)
Arab21 (3.9%)45 (3.1%)
Other7 (1.3%)28 (1.9%)
Role 3.2%<0.001
Doctor140 (26.3%)486 (33.1%)
Nurse125 (23.5%)188 (12.8%)
Other health professional161 (30.3%)382 (26.0%)
Not a health professional105 (19.7%)401 (27.8%)
Frontline workers 372 (69.9%)795 (54.1%)0.6%<0.001
COVID-19 prior to vaccination 0%
Laboratory confirmed exposure366 (68.8%)NA
Consistent symptoms, not tested166 (31.2%)NA
No known exposureNA1470 (100%)
Vaccine type 0.5%NS
Pfizer443 (83.3%)1230 (83.7%)
Oxford AstraZeneca80 (15.0%)202 (13.7%)
Other4 (0.8%)20 (1.4%)
Unknown2 (0.4%)3 (0.2%)
Vaccine preconception 0.8%NS
Positive343 (64.5%)1027 (69.9%)
Neutral76 (14.3%)174 (11.8%)
Negative110 (20.7%)259 (17.6%)
Second vaccine dose received 114 (21.4%)411 (28.0%)0%0.004
Past medical history 7.7%
Chronic cardiac disease9 (1.7%)25 (1.7%)NS
Chronic respiratory disease74 (13.9%)171 (11.6%)NS
Chronic kidney disease4 (0.8%)9 (0.6%)NS
Chronic liver disease1 (0.2%)6 (0.4%)NS
Chronic neurological disease8 (1.5%)17 (1.2%)NS
Active cancer1 (0.2%)9 (0.6%)NS
Asplenia1 (0.2%)4 (0.3%)NS
Allergy56 (10.5%)134 (9.1%)NS
Diabetes17 (3.2%)49 (3.3%)NS
Hay fever, eczema114 (21.4%)251 (17.1%)0.04
Immunosuppression14 (2.6%)49 (33.3%)NS
Transplantation history0 (0%)0 (0%)NS
None282 (53.0%)825 (56.1%)NS

* Participants with a prior COVID-19 exposure were younger compared with those without a prior exposure. See Figure A1.

Figure A1

Age of the participants stratified by whether they had or did not have a previous COVID-19 infection.

Figure A2

Age of the participants stratified by the type of vaccine they received.

A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an 8% increase in the risk of having any side effects after the first vaccine dose (RR 1.08, 95% CI (1.05–1.11), Table 1, Figure 1). We also observed a significantly increased risk of self-reported fever (2.24 (1.86–2.70)), breathlessness (2.05 (1.28–3.29)), flu-like illness (1.78 (1.51–2.10)), fatigue (1.34 (1.2–1.49)), local reactions (1.10 (1.06–1.15)) and “other” side effects (1.46 (1.16–1.82)). Among those experiencing side effects, a prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased severity of any side effect, local side effects or fatigue (p < 0.001). More importantly, a prior COVID-19 infection was associated with the risk of experiencing a severe side effect requiring hospital care (1.56 (1.14–2.12)). These observations remained significant in multivariate analyses and our sensitivity analysis (Table A3). A similar increase in the risk of any side effects following the second dose in those with a prior COVID-19 infection was also noted (1.08 (1.05–1.11)), although the lack of significant associations with specific side effects may have resulted from the limited sample included in this analysis.
Table 1

Differences in the incidence and severity of side effects after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine among participants who had or did not have a prior COVID-19 infection.

Side EffectIncidence of Side Effects: Risk Ratio (95% CI)Incidence of Side Effects: Multivariate Logistic Regression, Coefficient (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Univariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Multivariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)
Any side effect1.08 (1.05–1.11)0.575 (0.004)<0.001<0.001
Localized reaction1.10 (1.06–1.15)0.45 (0.003)<0.0010.003
Fever2.24 (1.86–2.70)0.876 (<0.001)NSNS
Flu-like illness1.78 (1.51–2.10)0.658 (<0.001)NSNS
Shortness of breath2.05 (1.28–3.29)0.651 (0.011)NSNS
Skin rash1.04 (0.54–2.00)NSNSNS
Tingling1.26 (0.83–1.91)NSNSNS
Swelling1.00 (0.32–3.14)NSNSNS
Generalized swelling1.84 (0.94–3.60)NSNSNS
Anaphylaxis0.55 (0.06–4.72)NSNSNS
Fatigue or tiredness1.34 (1.2–1.49)0.418 (<0.001)<0.001<0.001
Other1.46 (1.16–1.82)0.349 (0.013)NSNS
Worse outcomes associated with a prior COVID-19 infection
Figure 1

Incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine among participants who had or did not have a known prior COVID-19 infection. Risk ratios less than 1 favoured those that did not have a prior COVID-19 infection.

Table A3

Differences in the incidence and severity of side effects after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine among participants who had or did not have a prior self-reported COVID-19 infection. Sensitivity analysis only included participants with a prior COVID-19 infection confirmed with a consistent PCR or antibody test (n = 366) versus those without any suspicion of a prior COVID-19 infection (n = 1470).

Side EffectIncidence of Side Effects: Risk Ratio (95% CI)Incidence of Side Effects: Multivariate Logistic Regression, Coefficient (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Univariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Multivariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)
Any side effect1.09 (1.05–1.12)0.581 (0.015)<0.0010.004
Localized reaction1.11 (1.06–1.16)0.411 (0.019)0.002NS
Fever2.45 (2.01–3)0.902 (<0.001)NSNS
Flu-like illness1.92 (1.61–2.29)0.691 (<0.001)NSNS
Shortness of breath2.06 (1.22–3.49)0.564 (0.043)NSNS
Skin rash1.38 (0.7–2.71)NSNSNS
Tingling1.22 (0.75–1.98)NSNSNS
Swelling0.73 (0.16–3.28)NSNSNS
Generalized swelling1.72 (0.8–3.73)NSNSNS
Anaphylaxis0.8 (0.09–6.85)NSNSNS
Fatigue or tiredness1.39 (1.24–1.56)0.459 (<0.001)<0.0010.002
Other1.45 (1.12–1.87)0.288 (0.069)NSNS
Worse outcomes associated with a prior COVID-19 infection
Furthermore, significant differences were observed between the side effect profiles of mRNA versus viral vector vaccines (predominantly Pfizer versus AstraZeneca, Table 2, Figure 2). Overall, the recipients of mRNA vaccines reported a higher incidence of any self-reported side effects (1.06 (1.01–1.11)), which were, however, of significantly milder severity compared with those who received viral vector vaccines. While mRNA vaccines were associated with an increased incidence of reported local reactions (1.29 (1.19–1.40)), they were associated with a considerably lower incidence of self-reported systemic side effects including anaphylaxis (0.19 (0.04–0.62)), fever (0.28 (0.24–0.34)), swelling in the face or mouth (0.29 (0.10–0.80)) or generalized swelling (0.29 (0.15–0.56)), flu-like illness (0.34 (0.29–0.40)), breathlessness (0.43 (0.26–0.70)), fatigue (0.56 (0.51–0.62)) or other side effects (0.67 (0.52–0.86)). These observations were corroborated by multivariate analyses. Most importantly, mRNA vaccines were associated with a significantly lower incidence of severe side effects (requiring hospital care, RR 0.42 (0.31–0.58)).
Table 2

Differences in the incidence and severity of side effects among people who received an mRNA or a viral vector vaccine.

Side EffectIncidence of Side Effects: Risk Ratio (95% CI)Incidence of Side Effects: Multivariate Logistic Regression, Coefficient (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Univariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Multivariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)
Any side effect1.06 (1.01–1.11)NS<0.001<0.001
Localized reaction1.29 (1.19–1.40)0.892 (<0.001)NSNS
Fever0.28 (0.24–0.34)−1.993 (<0.001)<0.001NS
Flu-like illness0.34 (0.29–0.40)−1.795 (<0.001)<0.001NS
Shortness of breath0.43 (0.26–0.70)−0.853 (0.002)NSNS
Skin rash0.86 (0.40–1.83)NSNSNS
Tingling0.68 (0.43–1.09)NSNSNS
Swelling0.29 (0.10–0.80)−1.326 (0.015)NSNS
Generalized swelling0.29 (0.15–0.56)−1.423 (<0.001)NSNS
Anaphylaxis0.19 (0.04–0.94)−1.890 (0.024)NSNS
Fatigue or tiredness0.56 (0.51–0.62)−1.331 (<0.001)<0.001NS
Other0.67 (0.52–0.86)−0.471 (0.004)NSNS
mRNA vaccines superiority
Viral vector vaccines superiority
Figure 2

Incidence and severity of side effects after the first dose of (1) an mRNA or (2) a viral vector vaccine. Risk ratios less than 1 favoured the mRNA vaccine.

In general, the second dose of the vaccine was associated with a higher incidence of side effects (Table 3). More specifically, respondents reported experiencing more frequently any side effects (1.04 (1.01–1.07)), skin rash (2.25 (1.4–3.62)), fever (1.72 (1.46–2.02)), flu-like illness (1.67 (1.45–1.91)) and fatigue (1.40 (1.28–1.53)). In addition, a multivariate regression demonstrated that participants who had side effects after the first vaccine dose were at a significantly higher risk of having the same side effects after the second dose. Among those experiencing side effects, the severity did not significantly differ between the two doses. However, the likelihood of having a severe side effect requiring hospital care was significantly decreased (0.58 (0.38–0.88)).
Table 3

Differences in the incidence and severity of side effects after the second or the first dose of the vaccine.

Side EffectIncidence of Side Effects: Risk Ratio (95% CI)Incidence of Side Effects: Multivariate Logistic Regression, Coefficient (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Univariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Multivariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)
Any side effect1.04 (1.01–1.07)NSNSNS
Localized reaction0.98 (0.94–1.03)2.469 (<0.001)NSNS
Fever1.72 (1.46–2.02)1.3 (<0.001)NSNS
Flu-like illness1.67 (1.45–1.91)0.979 (0.001)NSNS
Shortness of breath0.95 (0.57–1.61)4.491 (<0.001)NSNS
Skin rash2.25 (1.4–3.62)4.297 (<0.001)0.05NS
Tingling1.31 (0.89–1.92)3.096 (<0.001)NSNS
Swelling2.03 (0.87–4.77)NSNSNS
Generalized swelling1.2 (0.61–2.34)4.925 (<0.001)NSNS
Anaphylaxis2.54 (0.72–8.98)4.747 (0.012)NSNS
Fatigue or tiredness1.4 (1.28–1.53)0.868 (<0.001)NSNS
Other1.05 (0.83–1.32)2.104 (<0.001)NSNS
Worse outcomes after the second COVID-19 vaccine dose
Stratification by ethnicity revealed that white participants reported a lower incidence of fever (0.62 (0.48–0.79)) and flu-like illness (0.78 (0.62–0.97)) compared with the remaining participants (Table A4). Finally, those reporting a pre-vaccination concern about the safety of the vaccine reported more often tingling (2.23 (1.45–3.42)), breathlessness (1.73 (1.00–2.98)) and fatigue (1.17 (1.03–1.34)) (Table A5).
Table A4

Differences in the incidence and severity of side effects among different ethnicities (white or other).

Side EffectIncidence of Side Effects: Risk Ratio (95% CI)Incidence of Side Effects: Multivariate Logistic Regression, Coefficient (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Univariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Multivariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)
Any side effect1.05 (0.99–1.11)NSNSNS
Localized reaction1.04 (0.97–1.12)NSNSNS
Fever0.62 (0.48–0.79)–0.546 (0.003)NSNS
Flu-like illness0.78 (0.62–0.97)NSNSNS
Shortness of breath1.16 (0.54–2.5)NSNSNS
Skin rash0.7 (0.32–1.56)NSNSNS
Tingling1.69 (0.79–3.61)NSNSNS
Swelling0.86 (0.2–3.81)NSNSNS
Generalized swelling0.64 (0.27–1.53)NSNSNS
Anaphylaxis0.66 (0.08–5.67)NSNSNS
Fatigue or tiredness0.88 (0.76–1.02)NSNSNS
Other1.38 (0.94–2.03)0.446 (0.049)NSNS
Worse outcomes: non-white ethnicity
Worse outcomes: white ethnicity
Table A5

Differences in the incidence and severity of side effects among people with a different preconception toward the vaccine prior to vaccination and those who were keen to receive the vaccine versus those who were concerned about receiving the vaccine.

Side EffectIncidence of Side Effects: Risk Ratio (95% CI)Incidence of Side Effects: Multivariate Logistic Regression, Coefficient (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Univariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)Severity of Side Effects: Multivariate Cumulative Risk Models (p-Value)
Any side effect1.01 (0.97–1.06)NS<0.0010.025
Localized reaction0.99 (0.93–1.05)NS0.002NS
Fever1.19 (0.93–1.53)NS0.009NS
Flu-like illness1.07 (0.86–1.34)NS<0.001NS
Shortness of breath1.73 (1.00–2.98)–0.085 (0.03)NSNS
Skin rash1.25 (0.59–2.65)NSNSNS
Tingling2.23 (1.45–3.42)–0.114 (0.001)NSNS
Swelling0.4 (0.05–3.03)NSNSNS
Generalized swelling0.72 (0.26–2.04)NSNSNS
AnaphylaxisNANSNSNS
Fatigue or tiredness1.17 (1.03–1.34)NS0.009NS
Other1.26 (0.96–1.66)–0.043 (0.045)NSNS
Worse outcomes: concerned
Multivariate analyses also revealed a strong negative association between age and the self-reporting of any side effect, local reactions, fever, flu-like illness, rash, tingling, generalized swelling and fatigue (p < 0.01). Finally, a history of allergy was associated with an increased incidence of self-reported breathlessness and rash (p < 0.01). However, as described in the previous paragraphs and tables, most of the associations observed in univariate analyses remained significant in multivariate analyses accounting for these and other potential confounding factors.

4. Discussion

People with a prior COVID-19 exposure were largely excluded from the vaccine trials [4,5,6] and, as a result, the safety and reactogenicity of the vaccines in this population have not been previously fully evaluated. For the first time, this study demonstrated a significant association between a prior COVID-19 infection and a significantly higher incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after a vaccination for COVID-19. Consistently, compared with the first dose of the vaccine, we found an increased incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after the second dose when recipients had been previously exposed to viral antigen, probably because they had already developed an immunity against the antigens. This was supported by recent studies demonstrating that seropositive individuals developed rapid immune responses with higher antibody titres after the first vaccination dose compared with those without a previous COVID-19 infection [10,11]. In view of the rapidly accumulating data demonstrating that COVID-19 survivors generally have an adequate natural immunity for at least six months, it may be appropriate to re-evaluate the recommendation for the immediate vaccination of this group. In the meantime, taking into account our findings as well as studies demonstrating higher antibody titres among individuals with a prior COVID-19 infection, it might be appropriate for a note to be included in the vaccine information sheets highlighting that these people are more likely to experience non-serious side effects. Moreover, this is the first head-to-head real-world comparison of the self-reported safety of viral vector versus mRNA vaccines with the latter associated with a 58% decreased incidence of self-reported severe side effects requiring hospital care. While a greater number of recipients of mRNA vaccines reported at least one (any) side effect, the difference was predominantly driven by the frequent local reactions. The incidence of the systemic side effects evaluated (flu-like illness, pyrexia and fatigue), which are more burdensome to the recipients, was significantly reduced. The recipients of the viral vector-based vaccines were relatively older. However, differences in the incidence of adverse events were confirmed in multivariate analyses accounting for the age of the respondents as a covariate. Moreover, given that older people reported side effects less frequently, a potential bias due to age difference would be expected to favour viral vector-based vaccines. These findings may have an impact on vaccine choice and health policies. The cause of the observed imbalance between the safety profiles of mRNA-based versus viral-vector vaccines was unclear and should be evaluated in future studies. The main strengths of our study included a large study population that better reflected real-life compared with the populations studied in the clinical trials, the availability of adequate details about the participants and the safety profiles of the vaccines and very limited missing data. The potential bias of respondents is the main limitation of any survey and as this survey was shared though social media, we were not able to estimate the non-response rate. However, the bias of respondents was more likely to affect the absolute incidence of side effects, which we did not evaluate here, rather than the relative incidence and severity across different groups of people. Potential recall bias should also be mentioned although all participants had been vaccinated within 10 weeks prior to completing the survey. As noted, most respondents were from the UK and Greece due to the ability of the investigators to establish contacts quickly to publicise this survey. The UK has also been successful in rolling out COVID-19 vaccines quickly leading to more of those invited being eligible to participate. It is not surprising that the Pfizer vaccine was the most delivered vaccine as it was the first vaccine to be licensed within the UK, with more individuals receiving it in total when the survey was circulated. In conclusion, this extensive survey of over 2000 recipients of COVID-19 vaccines confirmed the findings of recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating that COVID-19 vaccines are generally safe with limited severe side effects. Moreover, it linked previous COVID-19 illnesses with an increased incidence of vaccination side effects. It also demonstrated that mRNA vaccines caused milder, less frequent systemic side effects but more local reactions. These findings will need to be validated in clinical studies, preferably randomized controlled trials including patients from multiple groups.
  8 in total

1.  Binding and Neutralization Antibody Titers After a Single Vaccine Dose in Health Care Workers Previously Infected With SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Saman Saadat; Zahra Rikhtegaran Tehrani; James Logue; Michelle Newman; Matthew B Frieman; Anthony D Harris; Mohammad M Sajadi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  COVID-19 as the Leading Cause of Death in the United States.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Derek A Chapman; Jong Hyung Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

Authors:  Lindsey R Baden; Hana M El Sahly; Brandon Essink; Karen Kotloff; Sharon Frey; Rick Novak; David Diemert; Stephen A Spector; Nadine Rouphael; C Buddy Creech; John McGettigan; Shishir Khetan; Nathan Segall; Joel Solis; Adam Brosz; Carlos Fierro; Howard Schwartz; Kathleen Neuzil; Larry Corey; Peter Gilbert; Holly Janes; Dean Follmann; Mary Marovich; John Mascola; Laura Polakowski; Julie Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; Hamilton Bennett; Rolando Pajon; Conor Knightly; Brett Leav; Weiping Deng; Honghong Zhou; Shu Han; Melanie Ivarsson; Jacqueline Miller; Tal Zaks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up: results from a prospective UK cohort.

Authors:  David T Arnold; Fergus W Hamilton; Alice Milne; Anna J Morley; Jason Viner; Marie Attwood; Alan Noel; Samuel Gunning; Jessica Hatrick; Sassa Hamilton; Karen T Elvers; Catherine Hyams; Anna Bibby; Ed Moran; Huzaifa I Adamali; James William Dodd; Nicholas A Maskell; Shaney L Barratt
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial.

Authors:  Maheshi N Ramasamy; Angela M Minassian; Katie J Ewer; Amy L Flaxman; Pedro M Folegatti; Daniel R Owens; Merryn Voysey; Parvinder K Aley; Brian Angus; Gavin Babbage; Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer; Lisa Berry; Sagida Bibi; Mustapha Bittaye; Katrina Cathie; Harry Chappell; Sue Charlton; Paola Cicconi; Elizabeth A Clutterbuck; Rachel Colin-Jones; Christina Dold; Katherine R W Emary; Sofiya Fedosyuk; Michelle Fuskova; Diane Gbesemete; Catherine Green; Bassam Hallis; Mimi M Hou; Daniel Jenkin; Carina C D Joe; Elizabeth J Kelly; Simon Kerridge; Alison M Lawrie; Alice Lelliott; May N Lwin; Rebecca Makinson; Natalie G Marchevsky; Yama Mujadidi; Alasdair P S Munro; Mihaela Pacurar; Emma Plested; Jade Rand; Thomas Rawlinson; Sarah Rhead; Hannah Robinson; Adam J Ritchie; Amy L Ross-Russell; Stephen Saich; Nisha Singh; Catherine C Smith; Matthew D Snape; Rinn Song; Richard Tarrant; Yrene Themistocleous; Kelly M Thomas; Tonya L Villafana; Sarah C Warren; Marion E E Watson; Alexander D Douglas; Adrian V S Hill; Teresa Lambe; Sarah C Gilbert; Saul N Faust; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Antibody Responses in Seropositive Persons after a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine.

Authors:  Florian Krammer; Komal Srivastava; Hala Alshammary; Angela A Amoako; Mahmoud H Awawda; Katherine F Beach; Maria C Bermúdez-González; Dominika A Bielak; Juan M Carreño; Rachel L Chernet; Lily Q Eaker; Emily D Ferreri; Daniel L Floda; Charles R Gleason; Joshua Z Hamburger; Kaijun Jiang; Giulio Kleiner; Denise Jurczyszak; Julia C Matthews; Wanni A Mendez; Ismail Nabeel; Lubbertus C F Mulder; Ariel J Raskin; Kayla T Russo; Ashley-Beathrese T Salimbangon; Miti Saksena; Amber S Shin; Gagandeep Singh; Levy A Sominsky; Daniel Stadlbauer; Ania Wajnberg; Viviana Simon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Are overwhelmed health systems an inevitable consequence of covid-19? Experiences from China, Thailand, and New York State.

Authors:  Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Mary T Bassett; Qingyue Meng; Anne Mills
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-01-22
  8 in total
  35 in total

Review 1.  Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by COVID-19 Vaccines: Current Trends, Potential Mechanisms and Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Shuen-Iu Hung; Ivan Arni C Preclaro; Wen-Hung Chung; Chuang-Wei Wang
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  Safety and Adverse Events Related to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines; a Systematic Review.

Authors:  SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi; Amirali Karimi; Zahra Pashaei; Arian Afzalian; Pegah Mirzapour; Kobra Ghorbanzadeh; Afsaneh Ghasemzadeh; Mohsen Dashti; Newsha Nazarian; Farzin Vahedi; Marcarious M Tantuoyir; Ahmadreza Shamsabadi; Omid Dadras; Esmaeil Mehraeen
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-22

Review 3.  A systematic review on mucocutaneous presentations after COVID-19 vaccination and expert recommendations about vaccination of important immune-mediated dermatologic disorders.

Authors:  Farnoosh Seirafianpour; Homa Pourriyahi; Milad Gholizadeh Mesgarha; Arash Pour Mohammad; Zoha Shaka; Azadeh Goodarzi
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Local and Systemic Adverse Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Comparing Two Vaccine Types and Occurrence of Previous COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Oleguer Parés-Badell; Xavier Martínez-Gómez; Laia Pinós; Blanca Borras-Bermejo; Sonia Uriona; Susana Otero-Romero; José Ángel Rodrigo-Pendás; Yolima Cossio-Gil; Antònia Agustí; Cristina Aguilera; Magda Campins
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Auricular acupressure for adverse events following immunization related to COVID-19 vaccine injection: study protocol for a multicenter, three-arm, blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qinwei Fu; Hui Xie; Li Zhou; Xinrong Li; Yang Liu; Min Liu; Chaoyu Wang; Xiaocen Wang; Zhiqiao Wang; Jinfan Tang; Huan Xiao; Zhiyong Xiao; Jing Zhou; Chengzhi Feng; Li Wang; Zhimin Ao; Xi Chen; Chang Su; Xuanyu Wu; Maolan Zhao; Sihan Hu; Hanwen Lin; Jiali Huang; Guo Xu; Qinxiu Zhang; Luyun Jiang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Previous COVID-19 infection, but not Long-COVID, is associated with increased adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination.

Authors:  Rachael Kathleen Raw; Clive Anthony Kelly; Jon Rees; Caroline Wroe; David Robert Chadwick
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 38.637

7.  Impacts of Side Effects to BNT162b2 and the First Dose of ChAdOx1 Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination on Work Productivity, the Need for Medical Attention, and Vaccine Acceptance: A Multicenter Survey on Healthcare Workers in Referral Teaching Hospitals in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Tark Kim; Se Yoon Park; Shinae Yu; Jung Wan Park; Eunjung Lee; Min Hyok Jeon; Tae Hyong Kim; Eun Ju Choo
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  Systemic Adverse Events and Use of Antipyretics Predict the Neutralizing Antibody Positivity Early after the First Dose of ChAdOx1 Coronavirus Disease Vaccine.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Seong-Ho Choi; Jin-Won Chung; Min-Hyung Hwang; Min-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  The Gender Impact Assessment among Healthcare Workers in the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination-An Analysis of Serological Response and Side Effects.

Authors:  Chiara Di Resta; Davide Ferrari; Marco Viganò; Matteo Moro; Eleonora Sabetta; Massimo Minerva; Alberto Ambrosio; Massimo Locatelli; Rossella Tomaiuolo
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  Adverse reactions to the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroki Kitagawa; Yuki Kaiki; Aya Sugiyama; Shintaro Nagashima; Akemi Kurisu; Toshihito Nomura; Keitaro Omori; Tomoyuki Akita; Norifumi Shigemoto; Junko Tanaka; Hiroki Ohge
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.065

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.