| Literature DB >> 33803000 |
Charlotte Lauridsen1,2, Anna Amanda Schönherz1, Søren Højsgaard3.
Abstract
This study investigates two levels of dietary selenium (Se) and vitamin E in combination on their status in sows and their progeny, and influence on antioxidant status and immunological responses of the piglets at weaning. Female pigs (n = 6) were provided LOW or HIGH antioxidant nutrition (Se and vitamin E) from mating until weaning of their off-spring. The HIGH treatment elevated the concentration of Se (p = 0.015) and α-tocopherol (p = 0.023) in plasma of piglets compared with piglets of the LOW treatment. Treatments also affected the concentrations of milk and sow plasma immunoglobulins. Piglets from sows on the HIGH treatment had increased (p < 0.001) activity of glutathione peroxidase, lower serum levels of C-reactive protein (p = 0.005), haptoglobin (p = 0.05) and albumin (p = 0.05), and the number of white blood cells (p = 0.023) and the ratio of NEU to LYM was lower (p = 0.025) than in piglets from sows on the LOW group. Furthermore, the dietary antioxidant level influenced responses of cytokines (interleukine (IL) 6 (p = 0.007), 12 (p = 0.01) and 18 (p = 0.01)) in piglets' plasma. In conclusion, improved antioxidant status via dietary maternal provision improves the robustness of the offspring via immunomodulatory mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant status; immunity; piglets; selenium; sows; vitamin E
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803000 PMCID: PMC8002634 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10030478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Effect of dietary antioxidant level 1 on concentration of vitamin E (α-Toc.), selenium (Se) and immunoglobulins (Ig) A, G, and M in colostrum (day 2) and milk of sows (n = 3 sows per treatment. Means and standard error of mean (SEM)).
| Time after Birth | Day 2 | Day 11 | Day 25 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | HIGH | LOW | HIGH | LOW | HIGH | Treatment | Time | |
| α-Toc, mg/L 1 | 6.64 (3.00) | 24.2 (3.72) | 2.07 (0.23) | 6.53 (0.26) | 1.37 (0.21) | 4.14 (0.48) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Se, μg/L | 74.5 (38.8) | 112 (4.3) | 66.5 (18.2) | 77.9 (21.6) | 53.7 (22.8) | 89.9 (32.3) | 0.15 | 0.54 |
| IgA, mg/L | 3829 (1688) | 2921 (812) | 3157 (523) | 2775 (276) | 2604 (360) | 2892 (324) | 0.011 | 0.20 |
| IgG mg/L | 12,615 (10,500) | 7498 (4867) | 474 (96.2) | 662 (72.3) | 209 (54.6) | 388 (22.9) | 0.47 | <0.001 |
| IgM, mg/L | 2650 (53.7) | 4066 (1259) | 2266 (111) | 4434 (1128) | 1188 (107) | 2996 (631) | 0.028 | 0.158 |
1 When data were analysed on a logarithmic scale, the visual analysis revealed an additive relationship between the content of α-tocopherol or IgG and the effect of treatment.
Effect of maternal dietary antioxidant level on concentration of vitamin E (α-Toc.), selenium (Se) and immunoglobulins (Ig) A, G, and M in plasma of off-springs (LOW: n = 26 piglets; HIGH: n = 27 piglets; means and standard error of mean (SEM)).
| Time after Birth | Day 4 | Day 11 | Day 25 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | HIGH | LOW | HIGH | LOW | HIGH | Treatment | Time | |
| α-Toc, mg/L | 3.56 (0.41) | 6.39 (0.62) | 1.61 (0.12) | 4.65 (0.28) | 2.26 (0.14) | 5.41 (0.31) | 0.023 | <0.001 |
| Se, μg/L | 11.6 (1.10) | 19.9 (2.73) | 7.38 (0.98) | 21.1 (1.17) | 9.41 (0.75) | 20.5 (1.13) | 0.015 | 0.67 |
| IgA, mg/L | 2477 (226) | 1256 (133) | 202 (29.1) | 146 (15.1) | 113 (14.1) | 127 (9.68) | 0.045 | <0.001 |
| IgG, mg/L | 18483 (1672) | 15497 (1283) | 12275 (1262) | 9455 (756) | 4981 (346) | 4272 (380) | 0.26 | <0.001 |
| IgM, mg/L | 1332 (100) | 1816 (138) | 353 (33.0) | 515 (32.3) | 806 (59.2) | 898 (78.9) | 0.16 | <0.001 |
Effect of maternal dietary antioxidant level on activity of antioxidative enzymes in plasma of off-springs at day 25 of age (LOW: n = 26 piglets; HIGH: n = 27 piglets; Mean and standard error of mean (SEM)).
| LOW | HIGH | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH-Px, nnmol/min/mL | 256 | 338 | 60.4 | <0.001 |
| SOD, U/mL | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.24 | 0.174 |
| MDA, μM | 18.0 | 18.3 | 4.11 | 0.794 |
Effect of maternal dietary antioxidant level on haematological parameters of the off-springs at day 25 of age (LOW: n = 26 piglets; HIGH: n = 27 piglets; Mean and standard error of mean (SEM)).
| LOW | HIGH | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC, ×109/L | 19.3 | 14.3 | 7.28 | 0.027 |
| Neutrophils, % | 11.7 | 7.4 | 6.57 | 0.031 |
| Lymphocytes, % | 37.2 | 53.3 | 16.4 | 0.002 |
| Monocytes, % | 3.36 | 3.77 | 1.50 | 0.361 |
| Eosinophils, % | 1.08 | 0.95 | 0.65 | 0.482 |
| Erythrocytes, ×1012/L | 6.25 | 6.42 | 0.47 | 0.220 |
| Haematocrit, % | 37.5 | 39.4 | 3.38 | 0.073 |
| Haemoglobin, mmol/L | 113 | 117 | 10.2 | 0.147 |
| Neutrophils:Lymphocytes | 1.81 | 1.16 | 0.94 | 0.025 |
| Reticulocytes, % | 4.24 | 5.28 | 2.34 | 0.145 |
Effect of maternal dietary antioxidant level on C-reactive protein (CRP), haptoglobin, albumin and cytokines (after LPS-stimulation) in plasma of off-springs at day 25 of age (LOW: n = 26 piglets; HIGH: n = 27 piglets; Mean and standard error of mean (SEM)).
| LOW | HIGH | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRP, µg/mL | 767 | 300 | 489 | 0.005 |
| Haptoglobin, mg/mL | 1.34 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.05 |
| Albumin, g/L | 34.2 | 32.0 | 3.38 | 0.05 |
| INF, ng/mL | 3.37 | 2.97 | 1.73 | 0.49 |
| IL-1a, ng/mL | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.96 |
| IL-1b, ng/mL | 5.04 | 3.97 | 3.33 | 0.33 |
| IL-1ra, ng/mL | 4.30 | 4.76 | 3.70 | 0.71 |
| IL-2, ng/mL | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.022 | 0.63 |
| IL-4, ng/mL | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.37 |
| IL-6, ng/mL | 0.59 | 1.01 | 0.44 | 0.007 |
| IL-8, ng/mL | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| IL-10, ng/mL | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.64 |
| IL-12, ng/mL | 0.77 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 0.01 |
| IL-18, ng/mL | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.25 | 0.02 |
| TNF-α, ng/mL | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| INF:IL-4 | 67.2 | 56.6 | 39.9 | 0.42 |
Figure 1Comparison of treatment effect investigated for each gene, tissue, and ileal sample position, separately. p-values were estimated from mixed effect models with treatment as fixed and sow as random effect using the Satterthwaite’s method. Linear mixed effect model analyses were performed for each gene, tissue, and sample position within tissue, separately, and grouped boxplots including all genes were generated: for (A) epithelium samples collected from 50%; (B) mucosal samples collected from 50%; (C) liver samples, (D) epithelium samples collected from 90%; (E) mucosal samples collected from 90%. Pairwise comparisons are separated by grey dashed lines. Mean values per group are indicated by red dashed lines. n = 18 piglets.
Figure 2Comparison of ileal position effect (pos50 versus pos90) of epithelium and mucosal samples for each gene. p-values were estimated from mixed effect models with position as fixed and sow and piglet as random effect using the Satterthwaite’s method. Linear mixed effect model analyses were performed for each gene, tissue, and treatment group, separately, and grouped boxplots including all genes were generated: for (A) epithelium samples from the LOW treatment group; (B) mucosal samples from the LOW treatment group; (C) epithelium samples from the HIGH treatment group; (D) mucosal samples from the HIGH treatment group. Pairwise comparisons are separated by grey dashed lines. Mean values per group are indicated by red dashed lines. n = 18 piglets.