| Literature DB >> 33802976 |
Annakaisa Tirronen1, Nicholas L Downes1, Jenni Huusko1, Johanna P Laakkonen1, Tomi Tuomainen1, Pasi Tavi1, Marja Hedman2,3, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala1,4.
Abstract
Molecular mechanisms involved in cardiac remodelling are not fully understood. To study the role of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR-1) signaling in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and heart failure, we used a mouse model lacking the intracellular VEGFR-1 tyrosine kinase domain (VEGFR-1 TK-/-) and induced pressure overload with angiotensin II infusion. Using echocardiography (ECG) and immunohistochemistry, we evaluated pathological changes in the heart during pressure overload and measured the corresponding alterations in expression level and phosphorylation of interesting targets by deep RNA sequencing and Western blot, respectively. By day 6 of pressure overload, control mice developed significant LVH whereas VEGFR-1 TK-/- mice displayed a complete absence of LVH, which correlated with significantly increased mortality. At a later time point, the cardiac dysfunction led to increased ANP and BNP levels, atrial dilatation and prolongation of the QRSp duration as well as increased cardiomyocyte area. Immunohistochemical analyses showed no alterations in fibrosis or angiogenesis in VEGFR-1 TK-/- mice. Mechanistically, the ablation of VEGFR-1 signaling led to significantly upregulated mTOR and downregulated PKCα phosphorylation in the myocardium. Our results show that VEGFR-1 signaling regulates the early cardiac remodelling during the compensatory phase of pressure overload and increases the risk of sudden death.Entities:
Keywords: Flt1; HFpEF; VEGFR-1; heart failure; hypertrophy; pressure overload
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802976 PMCID: PMC8002705 DOI: 10.3390/biom11030452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1VEGFR-1 signaling regulates the early stage of compensatory LVH. Progression of LVH as followed by echocardiography. (A) Representative short axis view images of LVs at day 0, 6 and 14. (B) LV ejection fraction (EF; n = 6–13/group). (C) LV anterior wall (LVAW) thickness (n = 6–13/group). (D). LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD; n = 6–13/group). (E) LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD; n = 6–13/group). (F) LV systolic volume (LV Vol;s; n = 6–13/group). (G) Aortic root diameter (n = 6–13/group). Values are mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 2VEGFR-1 TK−/− mice show significantly increased mortality. Mortality of VEGFR-1 TK−/− and control mice during 14-day follow-up after angII infusion (n = 10–13/group). Values are mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan–Mayer with log-rank test for survival curve. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 3Deletion of VEGFR-1 signaling leads to QRSp prolongation after pressure overload. (A) Representative electrocardiographs of baseline and day 14 of angII infusion. (B) Electrocardiographic measurements during baseline and LVH (n = 7–13/group). Values are mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using Student´s t-test. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Amp indicates amplitude; BPM, beats per minute; HR, heart rate; ms, millisecond; mV millivolt.
Figure 4VEGFR-1 TK−/− mice display cardiomyocyte hypertrophy at day 14. (A) Haematoxylin & Eosin (scale bar is 1000 µm) and laminin (scale bar is 25 µm) stainings of the myocardium at day 14 of angII infusion. (B) Quantification of cardiomyocyte area (n = 8–10/group). (C) LV mass measured with echocardiogram (n = 7–11/group). (D) Relative ANP mRNA expression measured with RT qPCR (n = 5–7/group). (E) Relative BNP expression measured with RT qPCR (n = 5–7/group). (F) Masson’s staining of the myocardium (scale bar is 250 µm). (G) Quantification of the level of fibrosis in the ventricles (n = 6–9/group). (H) Quantification of the level of septal fibrosis (n = 6–9/group). (I) Sirius Red staining of the perivascular fibrosis (scale bar is 100 µm). (J) Quantification of the level of perivascular fibrosis (n = 6–9/group). (K) Relative mRNA expression of Col3a1 measured with RT qPCR (n = 5–7/group). Values are mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test and Student´s t-test. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 5VEGFR-1 TK signaling does not affect angiogenesis. (A) Representative images of lectin staining of myocardial sections at day 14 of angII infusion (scale bar is 50 µm). (B) Quantification of capillary density in LV (n = 7–9/group). (C) Quantification of capillary area (n = 7–9/group). (D) Representative images of staining for arteries (αSMA; scale bar is 100 µm). (E) Quantification of arterial vessel density (n = 8–10/group). (F) Quantification of αSMA-positive vessel area (n = 8–10/group). (G) Representative images of staining for CD31 to visualise capillary tree at baseline. (H) Quantification of capillary area (n = 6–9/group). (I) Quantification of apoptotic cells at day 14 of angII infusion (n = 8–10/group). Values are mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using Students t-test. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 6LVH increases VEGFR-1 expression in the myocardium. (A) Representative images of VEGFR-1 staining of the myocardium at baseline and after 14-day angII infusion. (B) Relative VEGFR-1 and VEGF-B expression measured with RT qPCR (n = 5–7/group). (C) RNA sequencing of LVs at day 14 of angII infusion. Volcano plot in which red represents significance in VEGFR-1 TK−/− mice compared to littermate controls with the use of a log fold change (logFC) >0.585 and false discovery rate (FDR) value of <0.10 (n = 4/group). (D) Word cloud presentation of differentially regulated genes found in RNA sequencing. Upregulated genes are marked with green and downregulated genes with a red colour. Larger word size correlates with higher fold change (n = 4/group). (E) Western blot analysis of LVH signaling cascades at day 14 of angII infusion. Quantification of VEGFR-2 (F), VEGF-A (G) phosphorylated ERK1/2 (H), Akt (I), mTOR (J) and PKCα (K) expression in LVs (n = 4–5/group). Values are mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test. *** p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.