| Literature DB >> 33802753 |
Smriti Juriasingani1,2, Aushanth Ruthirakanthan2, Mahms Richard-Mohamed2,3, Masoud Akbari1,2, Shahid Aquil2,3, Sanjay Patel2,3, Rafid Al-Ogaili2,3, Matthew Whiteman4, Patrick Luke1,2,3,5, Alp Sener1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Cold preservation is the standard of care for renal grafts. However, research on alternatives like perfusion at higher temperatures and supplementing preservation solutions with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has gained momentum. In this study, we investigated whether adding H2S donor AP39 to porcine blood during subnormothermic perfusion at 21 °C improves renal graft outcomes. Porcine kidneys were nephrectomized after 30 min of clamping the renal pedicles and treated to 4 h of static cold storage (SCS) on ice or ex vivo subnormothermic perfusion at 21 °C with autologous blood alone (SNT) or with AP39 (SNTAP). All kidneys were reperfused ex vivo with autologous blood at 37 °C for 4 h. Urine output, histopathology and RNAseq were used to evaluate the renal graft function, injury and gene expression profiles, respectively. The SNTAP group exhibited significantly higher urine output than other groups during preservation and reperfusion, along with significantly lower apoptotic injury compared to the SCS group. The SNTAP group also exhibited differential pro-survival gene expression patterns compared to the SCS (downregulation of pro-apoptotic genes) and SNT (downregulation of hypoxia response genes) groups. Subnormothermic perfusion at 21 °C with H2S-supplemented blood improves renal graft outcomes. Further research is needed to facilitate the clinical translation of this approach.Entities:
Keywords: AP39; donation after cardiac death; hydrogen sulfide; ischemia–reperfusion injury; kidney preservation; porcine model; subnormothermic perfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802753 PMCID: PMC8002411 DOI: 10.3390/biom11030446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Summary of the methods. (A) Overview of the experimental design. (B) Schematic of the ex vivo perfusion setup used for porcine kidney perfusion and reperfusion. (C) RNAseq analysis workflow.
Figure 2Subnormothermic perfusion with AP39 improves urine output during preservation and reperfusion. Porcine kidneys were nephrectomized after 30 min of clamping to mimic donation after cardiac death (DCD) injury and subjected to various preservation treatments for 4 h. This was followed by 4 h of reperfusion with stressed autologous blood. Urine output was collected during both perfusion periods for all groups, except for the static cold storage group, where kidneys were on ice during the 4 h of preservation. (A) Total urine output (mL) collected during 4 h of preservation perfusion. (B) Total urine output (mL) collected during 4 h of reperfusion with stressed blood. Lines represent mean ± SEM. Values in (A) were compared using a student’s unpaired t-test, and values in (B) were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. Circles represent values for static cold storage (SCS, n = 7). Squares represent values for subnormothermic perfusion (SNT, n = 6). Triangles represent values for subnormothermic perfusion with 200 nM AP39 (SNTAP, n = 7).
Figure 3Subnormothermic perfusion with AP39 reduces tissue apoptosis and acute tubular necrosis. (A) Representative Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) images of formalin-fixed DCD kidney sections after 4 h of preservation treatment and 4 h of reperfusion. Images were taken at 10× magnification (scale bar = 100 µm). (B) Mean %TUNEL+ area, as determined by ImageJ, using a ratio of the TUNEL+ area (brown) to total tubular area. Each individual data point represents the mean %TUNEL+ area of 10 random fields of view of one porcine kidney sample. (C) Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) scores based on H&E staining. Each individual data point represents the score assigned to one porcine kidney sample. Lines in (B,C) represent the means ± SEM. Values in (B,C) were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. * p < 0.05. Circles represent values for static cold storage (SCS, n = 7). Squares represent values for subnormothermic perfusion (SNT, n = 6). Triangles represent values for subnormothermic perfusion with 200 nM AP39 (SNTAP, n = 7).
Figure 4Principal component analysis of r-log normalized gene counts for all porcine kidney samples. Frozen renal cortical sections were used for the RNAseq analysis. RStudio was used to perform the principal component analysis with the full set of r-log normalized gene counts for all samples and to visualize the clustering of samples by group. CTR, control baseline kidney with no DCD injury or preservation treatment (n = 1). SCS, static cold storage (n = 3). SNT, subnormothermic perfusion (n = 3). SNTAP, subnormothermic perfusion with 200 nM AP39 (n = 3). Numbers following group names denote individual samples.
Figure 5Gene expression analysis after preservation using subnormothermic perfusion with AP39 vs. static cold storage. Frozen renal cortical sections (n = 3 for each group) were used for the RNAseq analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified using RStudio (DESeq2; alpha = 0.05). Gene Ontology (GO) annotations were found for those genes using g:Profiler, and the network enrichment analysis was performed using Cytoscape. (A) Network enrichment map showing certain nodes of interest (FDR Q value < 1.0 and Jaccard Overlap combined coefficient > 0.375 with a combined constant = 0.5). (B) Gene expression values (log2 fold change ± SEM, determined using RStudio) of certain genes of interest chosen from three nodes of interest from the enrichment map in (A)—response to stress, negative regulation of the apoptotic process and regulation of the DNA-templated transcription in response to stress.
Figure 6Gene expression analysis after preservation using subnormothermic perfusion with or without AP39. Frozen renal cortical sections (n = 3 for each group) were used for the RNAseq analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified using RStudio (DESeq2, alpha = 0.05). GO annotations were found for those genes using g:Profiler, and the network enrichment analysis was performed using Cytoscape. (A) Network enrichment map showing certain nodes of interest (FDR Q value < 1.0 and Jaccard Overlap combined coefficient > 0.375 with a combined constant = 0.5). (B) Gene expression values (log2 fold change ± SEM, determined using RStudio) of all the genes in the three connected nodes from the enrichment map in (A)—response to oxygen levels, hypoxia and decreased oxygen levels. (C) Gene expression values (log2 fold change ± SEM, determined using RStudio) of certain genes of interest from two nodes of interest from the enrichment map in (A)—regulation of the DNA-templated transcription and response to the endogenous stimulus.