Literature DB >> 33802135

Universal Adhesive for Fixed Retainer Bonding: In Vitro Evaluation and Randomized Clinical Trial.

Maria Francesca Sfondrini1, Simone Gallo1, Benedetta Turcato1, Mona A Montasser2, Nehal Fouad Albelasy2, Pekka K Vallittu3, Paola Gandini1, Andrea Scribante1.   

Abstract

This study aims to assess the efficacy of a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) (SB) in total-etch mode, compared to a traditional orthodontic primer (Transbond XT Primer, 3M ESPE) (XT Primer), to perform bonding of orthodontic fixed retainers along with the Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste (3M ESPE). For the in vitro study, a round section wire (Ortosmail Krugg) was bonded using XT Primer for 20 bovine incisors (Group 1) and SB for other 20 (Group 2). Samples were debonded in a universal testing machine applying a tangential force to specimens (crosshead speed of 1 millimeter per minute). Shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were calculated. For the in vivo study, 100 patients needing upper and lower canine-to-canine fixed retainers after orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups of 50 participants each, i.e., group 1 (retainer bonding with XT Primer) and group 2 (retainer bonding with SB). Over two years, examinations were carried out monthly, and detachments were registered by considering the teeth and arches affected. In vitro, no statistically significant differences in SBS and ARI scores were demonstrated between the two groups, both showing a mean bond strength of about 12 MPa and major frequency of ARI "2" (>50% remnant adhesive on the enamel). Conversely, a significantly lower failure rate over 2 years was assessed clinically for group 2 in both arches. Independently of the adhesive and arch, incisors reported a significantly higher failure rate than canines. Scotchbond Universal used in total-etch mode could be a valid alternative to the traditional orthodontic Transbond XT Primer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adhesion; bonding; clinical trial; fixed retainer; mandibular; maxillary; multistranded wire; orthodontics; splint; universal adhesive

Year:  2021        PMID: 33802135      PMCID: PMC7999612          DOI: 10.3390/ma14061341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  3 in total

1.  Utilization of a 3D Printed Orthodontic Distalizer for Tooth-Borne Hybrid Treatment in Class II Unilateral Malocclusions.

Authors:  Andrej Thurzo; Wanda Urbanová; Bohuslav Novák; Iveta Waczulíková; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Orthodontic Fixed Retainer and Unwanted Movements of Lower Anterior Teeth: A Case Report.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Maurizio Pascadopoli; Sergio Beccari; Giovanna Beccari; Cinzia Rizzi; Paola Gandini; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Effect of Enamel Pretreatment with Pastes Presenting Different Relative Dentin Abrasivity (RDA) Values on Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Efficacy of Microfilled Composite Resin: In Vitro Investigation and Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Maurizio Pascadopoli; Simone Gallo; Federico Ricaldone; Davide Dirk Kramp; Margherita Valla; Paola Gandini; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.