| Literature DB >> 33802013 |
Wenfang Han1,2, Qian Shi2, Renzong Hu1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: electrochromic devices; energy storage devices; multifunctional devices; tungsten oxides
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802013 PMCID: PMC8000231 DOI: 10.3390/nano11030692
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Applications of tungsten oxide-based materials for electronic devices.
Figure 2(a) Tilt patterns and stability temperature domains of the different polymorphs of WO3. Reproduced with permission from [41]. Copyright IUCr Journals, 2000. The structures of hexagon phase h-WO3 shown along (b) [001] plane and (c) [100] plane. Reproduced with permission from [40]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2009.
Figure 3Structures and mechanisms of tungsten oxides working in (a) supercapacitor (SC), (b) lithium ion battery (LIB), and (c) electrochromic device (ECD). (d) Physical image of the color changing process of WO3.
Figure 4(a) Initial discharge and charge curves of WO3 thin film anode. (b) SEM image of as-deposited WO3 thin film; (c) SEM and (d) selected-area diffraction (SAED) images of WO3 thin film after initially discharged to 0.01 V; (e) SEM and (f) SAED images of WO3 thin film after first charged to 4.0 V. Adapted with permission from [15]. Copyright Elsevier, 2010.
Electrochemical performances of different tungsten oxides-based electrodes in supercapacitors from literatures.
| Products and Structures | Synthesis Method | Electrochemical Performances | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potential Window, Reference Electrode, Electrolyte | Maximum Specific Capacity | Cycling Condition, Cycles, Capacity Retained | |||
| Single phase WO3 nanostructures | WO3 nanofibers [ | Hydrothermal | −0.65–0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, H+ | 2 mA cm−2, 1.72 F cm−2 | 10 mV s−1, 6000 cycles, 79.1% |
| WO3-x nanorods [ | Hydrothermal + annealing in hydrogen atmosphere | −10 V vs. SCE, 5 M LiCl | 1 mA cm−2, 1.83 F cm−2 | ----, 10,000 cycles, 74.8% | |
| WO3 nanosheets [ | Alcohol-thermal process | −1.0–0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 0.5 M Na2SO4 | 5 mA cm−2, 0.659 F cm−2 | ---, 10,000 cycles, almost no decrease | |
| WO3 nanotubes [ | Hydrothermal | −0.65–0.05 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 0.5 M H2SO4 | 3 mA cm−2, 2.58 F cm−2 | 2.5 A g−1, 6000 cycles, 85.11% (decreased from 496.4 to 422.5 F g−1) | |
| Furball-like WO3 microspheres [ | Hydrothermal | −0.3–0.4 V vs. SCE, 2 M H2SO4 | 2 mA cm−2, 8.35 F cm−2 (=708.0 F g−1) | 2 mA cm−2, 10,000 cycles, 93.4% | |
| WO3 nanorods array [ | Hydrothermal | −0.6–0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 2 M H2SO4 | 10 A cm−2, 5.21 F cm−2 | 3 A g−1, 2000 cycles, nearly 100% | |
| Hydrothermal | −0.7–0.2 V vs. SCE, 1 M H2SO4 | 5 mV s−1, 538 F g−1 | 100 mV s−1, 2000 CV cycles, 85% | ||
| Hydrothermal | −0.5–0 V vs. SCE, 1 M H2SO4 | 0.35 A g−1, 694 F g−1; | 50 mV s−1, 2000 cycles, 87% | ||
| WO3 Nanowires [ | Solvothermal | −0.4–0.6 V vs. SCE, 0.1 M H2SO4 | 1 A g−1, 465 F g−1 | ----, 2000 cycles, 97.7% | |
| W18O49 Nanowires [ | Solvothermal | −0.4–0.4 V vs. SCE, 1 M H2SO4 | 1 A g−1, 588.33 F g−1 | 1 A g−1, 5000 cycles, 88% | |
| Hydrothermal | 1.0–1.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 1 M Na2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1, 538 F g−1 | ----, 5000 cycles, 95.5% | ||
| WO3 nanospheres [ | Hydrothermal | SCE, 2 M H2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1, 797.05 F g−1 | 5 A g−1, 2000 cycles, 100.47% | |
| Frisbee-like | Hydrothermal | −0.6–0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 1 M H2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1, 391 F g−1 | 10 A g−1, 2000 cycles, 100% | |
| 3% Pd-doped WO3 nanobricks [ | Hydrothermal | −0.7–0.1 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 1 M Na2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1, 33.34 F g−1 | 1 A g−1, 1100 cycles, 86.95% | |
| Cactus-like WO3 microspheres [ | Hydrothermal | 0.0–0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 1 M Na2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1, 485 F g−1 | 1 A g−1, 5000 cycles, 93% | |
| Cactus-like WO3 microspheres [ | Hydrothermal | −0.6–0.2 V vs. SCE, 2 M H2SO4 | 5 mV s−1, 970.26 F g−1 | ----, ----, ---- | |
| Pancake-like | Hydrothermal | −0.3–0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.37 A g−1, 605.5 F g−1; | 50 mV s−1, 4000 cycles, 110.2% | |
| WO3 nanochannels [ | Electrochemical anodization | −0.8–0.5 V, 1 M Na2SO4 | 2 A cm−3, 397 F cm−3 | 10 A cm−3, 3500 cycles, 114% | |
| WO3-carbon composites | Flower-like hierarchical WO3·H2O/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) [ | Hydrothermal | −0.4–0.1 V vs. SCE, 1 M H2SO4 | 1 A g−1, 244 F g−1; | 4 A g−1, 900 cycles, 97% |
| Feather duster-like carbon nanotube (CNT)@WO3 [ | One-step solvothermal | −1–−0.3 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1 496 F g−1; | 100 mV s−1, 8000 cycles, 196.3% | |
| Multi-walled carbon nanotubes-tungsten trioxide [ | Hydrothermal | −0.6–0 V vs. SCE, 1 M LiClO4 | 2 mA cm−2, 429.6 F g−1 (1.55 F cm−2) | 100 mV s−1, 5000 cycles, 94.3% | |
| WO3-rGO nanoflowers [ | Hydrothermal | −0.4–0.3 V, 0.5 M H2SO4 | 1 A g−1, 495 F g−1 | 1 A g−1, 1000 cycles, 87.5% | |
| WO3 nanoparticles and nanowires in carbon aerogel [ | ---- | −0.3–0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 2 M H2SO4 | 5 mV s−1, 609 F g−1 | 50 mV s−1, 1000 cycles, 98% | |
| WO3 nanoparticles in carbon aerogel [ | Solvent immersion + calcination | −0.3–0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 2 M H2SO4 | 5 mV s−1, 1055 F g−1 | 500 mV s−1, 3000 cycles, 96% | |
| WO3-transition oxide composites | Binder-free and additive-less WO3-MnO2 [ | Hydrothermal | −0.6–0.6 V vs. SCE, 1 M Na2SO4 | 5 mV s−1, 609 F g−1 | 100 mV s−1, 2000 cycles, 89% |
| WO3*H2O/MnO2 nanosheets [ | Anodic deposition | −0.1–0.9 V vs. SCE, 0.5 M Na2SO4 | 0.5 A g−1, 363 F g−1 | 2 A g−1, 5000 cycles, 93.8% | |
| WO3–V2O5 nanocomposites [ | Microwave assisted wet chemical route | KOH electrolyte | ----, 173 F g−1 | ----, 5000 cycles, 126% | |
| 2D WO3/TiO2 heterojunction [ | Atomic layer deposition (ALD) | 0.0–0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 1 M H2SO4 | 1 A g−1, 625.53 F g−1 | 6 A g−1, 2000 cycles, 97.98% | |
| TiO2 nanoparticles-functionalized 2D WO3 film [ | Two-step atomic layer deposition process + post-annealing | 0.0–0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 1 M H2SO4 | 1.5 A g−1, 342.5 F g−1 | 6 A g−1, 2000 cycles, 94.7% | |
| Porous WO3@CuO [ | Template assisted method | 0.0–0.5 V vs. SCE, 6 M KOH | 1 A g−1, 284 F g−1 | ----, 1500 cycles, 85.2% | |
| WO3-organic materials composites | PEDOT/WO3 [ | Electrochemical deposition | −0.3–0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, (in 3 M NaCl), 0.5 M H2SO4 | 1.4 A g−1, 615 F g−1 | ----, ----,---- |
| WO3@PPy [ | In situ oxidative polymerization process | −0.8–0.0 V vs. SCE, 2 M KOH | 2 A g−1, 586 F g−1; | 5000 cycles, no significant changes in resistive property and morphology | |
Figure 5(a) High-resolution TEM image of as-prepared monodispersed tungsten oxide spherical quantum dots (QDs) with average sizes of 1.6 nm; (b) galvanostatic charge/discharge curves for QDs and bulk materials under currents of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 mA within potential from -0.5 to 0.2 V. Adapted with permission from [95]. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2014. High resolution SEM image (c) and cycling stability (d) of WO3 nanosheets. Adapted with permission from [69]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 6(a) Schematic illustration of the formation, (b) FE-SEM image, (c) charge-discharge curves at 0.5 A g−1, and (c) cycling test at 10 A g−1 of the frisbee-shaped crystalline h-WO3·0.28H2O. Adapted with permission from [77]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Electrochemical performances of different tungsten oxide-based electrodes in lithium battery from the literature.
| Products and Structures | Synthesis Method | Electrochemical Performances | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Efficiency | Voltage Window, Current Density, Capacity (Initial/Second) | Current Density/(mA/g), Cycles, Capacity Retained | |||
| Non-stochiometric tungsten oxides | m-WO3-x [ | Template method | 53% | 0–2.5 V, ---,748 mA h g−1 (1st) | ---,---, --- |
| N-WOx [ | Thermal annealing | 52.2% | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 1760 mA h g−1 (1st); 817 mA h g−1 (2nd) | 100 mA/g, 150 cycles, 954 mA h g−1 | |
| Nanogranular WO3 with excess oxygen [ | Magnetron sputtering | --- | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 778.8 mA h g−1 (1st) | 1 A g−1, 500 cycles, 217% retained | |
| Nanostructured tungsten oxides | WO3 Nanotubes [ | Hydrothermal | 77.8% | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 1121.4 mA h g−1 (1st) | 100 mA g−1, 200 cycles, 900 mA h g−1 |
| WO3 nanowires [ | Hydrothermal | 55.3% | 0–3.0 V, 0.1 C, 954 mA h g−1 (1st) | 0.1 C, 100 cycles, 552 mA h g−1 | |
| Flower-like | Hydrothermal + calcination | --- | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 2086.4 mA h g−1 (1st) | 100 mA g−1, 100 cycles, 720.5 mA h g−1 | |
| WO3 hollow nanospheres [ | Soft template assisted method | 74.0% | 0–3.0 V, 0.2 C, 1054 mA h g−1 (1st) | 0.2 C, 100 cycles, 294 mA h g−1 | |
| Carbon-tungsten oxides composites | 3D sandwich-type architecture with 2D WO3 nanoplatelets and 2D GS [ | Hydrothermal + ultrasonic stirring + thermal treatment | 71.8% | 0–3.0 V, 72 mA g−1, 1262 mA h g−1 (1st) | 1800 mA g−1, 500 cycles, 397 mA h g−1 |
| WO3 nanoplates and graphene nanosheets 2D nanocomposites [ | Hydrothermal + heating process | --- | ---, ---, --- | 400 mA g−1, 50 cycles, 455 mA h g−1 (64.3% retained) | |
| Bamboo-like WO3 nanorods anchored on 3D nitrogen-doped graphene frameworks [ | Hydrothermal + heating process | 64.5% | 0–3.0 V, 1280 mA h g−1 (1st) | 80 mA/g, 100 cycles, 828 mA h g−1 (73.8% retained) | |
| WO3 nanosheet@rGO square particles [ | Hydrothermal | 87.9% | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 1143 mA h g−1 (1st) | 100 mA g−1, 150 cycles, 1005.7 mA h/g | |
| Ultrasonic processing + hydrothermal | --- | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 1030 mA h g−1 (1st), 816.3 mA h g−1 (2nd) | 1500 mA g−1, 200 cycles, 196 mA h g−1 | ||
| WO3 particles deposited on 3D macroporous rGO frameworks [ | Hydrothermal + freeze-drying | 57.23% | 0–3.0 V, 50 mA g−1, 1120 mA h g−1 (1st), 719 mA h g−1 (2nd) | 150 mA g−1, 100 cycles, 487 mA h g−1 (~99% retained) | |
| Ordered mesoporous carbon/WO3 [ | Evaporation induced self-assembly | 56.2% | 0–3.0 V, 100 A g−1, 1275 mA h g−1 (1st), 712 mA h g−1 (2nd) | 100 mA/g, 100 cycles, 440 mA h g−1 | |
| Cauliflower-like WO3 decorated with carbon [ | Hydrothermal + firing | 67% | 0–3.0 V, 50 mA g−1, 750 mA h g−1 (1st) and 500 mA h g−1 (2nd) | 50 mA/g, 50 cycles, 650 mA h g−1 (~Li5.5WO3) | |
| Carbon-coated 3D WO3 [ | Template assisted process | 60.1% | 0–3.0 V, C/20, 10,791 mA h g−1 (1st), 649 mA h g−1 (2nd) | ---, 500 cycles, 253 mA h g−1 | |
| WO3*0.33H2O@C nanoparticles [ | Low temperature combustion | 46.1% | 0–3.0 V, 100 mA g−1, 1543 mA h g−1 (1st) | 100 mA g−1, 200 cycles, 816 mA h g−1 | |
| Ultrathin WO3−x/C nanosheets [ | Acid-assisted one-pot process | 39.4% | 0–3.0 V, 200 mA g−1, 1866 mA h g−1 (1st), 893 mA h g−1 (2nd) | 200 mA g−1, 100 cycles, 662 mA h g−1 | |
Figure 7(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process for WOx and N-WOx; (b) high-magnification high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of N-WOx; (c) rate performance of WOx, N-WOx, and WO3 between 0.1 A g−1 to 10 A g−1. Adapted with permission from [98]. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2019.
Figure 8(a) Schematic illustration of the formation of hierarchical flower-like WO3·0.33H2O; (b) SEM image of WO3·0.33H2O. Adapted with permission from [101]. Copyright Society of Chemistry, 2011. (c) Schematic illustration of the formation of 3D hierarchical sandwich-type tungsten trioxide nanoplatelets and graphene (TTNPs-GS); (d) SEM overall appearance of single TTNPs-GS; (e) long cycling stability at 1080 mA g−1 for 1000 cycles of TTNPs-GS. Adapted with permission from [103]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016.
Figure 9(a) Schematic illustration of the synthetic procedure, (b,c) SEM images for cauliflower-like carbon-coated WO3; (d) comparison of cycling performances of cauliflower-like WO3 and cauliflower-like carbon-coated WO3. Adapted with permission from [110]. Copyright Elsevier, 2014.
Figure 10Improvements of WO3 film doped with different materials.
Figure 11(a) Experiment setup for measurement of the capability of WO3/PH1000-based ECD on the modulation of solar heat; the thermal-imaging photography of the chamber under (b) bleached state and darkened state; (c) the temperature values of EC window (T1) and the back side of the chamber (T2) under bleached and darkened states. Adapted with permission from [150]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 12(a) SEM patterns of polystyrene (PS) template and (b) ordered macroporous WO3 films; (c) optical density and (d) coloration efficiency of WO3 films and ordered macroporous films. Adapted with permission from [152]. Copyright Elsevier, 2012.
Figure 13Optical transmittance spectra of the bulk m-WO3 film (a) and m-WO3-x nanowires film (b); (c) solar irradiance spectra of m-WO3-x nanowires films at 4, 2.8, 2.6 and 2 V; (d) physical photos of m-WO3-x nanowires films on ITO glasses at 4 V, 2.8 V, 2.6 V, and 2 V (vs. Li+/Li). Adapted with permission from [155]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2014. (e) Visible-NIR spectra showing the change in absorbance when a voltage is applied on the device, between the on (i.e., negative voltage, reduced tungsten oxide) and the off (i.e., positive voltage, oxidized tungsten oxide) states at 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.9 V; (f) zoom of the spectra obtained with lower voltages. Adapted with permission from [156]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012.
Performance of tungsten oxide-based electrochromic energy storage electrodes from literatures.
| Products and Structures | Method | Electro-Chromic Energy Storage Type | Electrochromic Performances | Energy Storage Capacity (C) | Cycling Performances | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical Transmittance Modulation (▲T) | Switching Time (tc, tb)/s | Color Efficiency/(cm2/C) | |||||
| WO3 nanosheets [ | Hydrothermal | ECSC | 64.5% (633 nm) | 6.6, 3.8 | 48.9 | 14.9 mF/cm2 | 1000 cycles, ▲T 83.7% retained |
| WO3·H2O nanosheet [ | Hydrothermal | ECSC | 79.0% (633 nm) | 10.1, 6.1 | 42.6 | 43.30 mF/cm2 | 2000 cycles, ▲T 87.8% retained |
| Oxygen-rich nanograin WO3 [ | Oblique-angle sputtering | ECSC | 82% (630 nm) | ---, --- | ~170 | 0.25 A g−1, 228 F g−1 | 2000 cycles, C 75% retained |
| Mesoporous WO3 film [ | Sol-gel | ECB | 75.6% (633 nm) | 2.4, 1.2 | 79.7 | 75.3 m A h g−1 | ------ |
| Nb-doped WO3 film [ | Sol-gel | ECB | 61.7% (633 nm) | 3.6, 2.1 | 49.7 | 74.4 m A h g−1 | 1000 cycles, ▲T 76.2% retained, C 75.8% retained |
| Mo-doped WO3 nanowire arrays [ | Hydrothermal | ECB | 56.7% (750 nm), 83.0% (1600 nm) | 3.2, 2.6 (750 nm) | 123.5 (750 nm) | 55.89 m A h g−1 | 3500 cycles, ▲T 57.3% retained; |
| Amorphous Mo-doped WO3 films [ | Electrodeposition | ECSC | 83.3% (633 nm) | 2.1, 2.0 | 86.1 | 0.25 mA/cm2, 117.1 mF/cm2 (334.6 m F g−1) | 4000 s, ▲T no obvious change |
| PANI/WO3 nanocomposite [ | Electropolymerization + annealing | ECSC | 35.3% (633 nm) | 13.6, 9.9 | 98.4 | 5 mV/s, 0.025 F/cm2 | 1000 cycles, charge density did not change too much |
| WO3/PANI nanocomposite [ | Chemical bath | ECSC | Color changes: brownish green-transparent-light green-brownish green | ---, --- | --- | 0.02 mA/cm2, 4.1 mF/cm2 | 800 cycles, C 38% retained |
| Urchin-like WO3@PANI [ | Solvothermal + electropolymerization | ECB | 45% (700 nm) | 1.9, 1.5 | --- | ---, 831 mA h g−1 | 1200 cycles, 516 mA h/g |
| Honeycombed porous poly(5-formylindole)/WO3 nanocomposites [ | Hydrothermal + electrochemical polymerization | ECSC | 26% (505 nm); 46% (745 nm) | ---, --- | 137 | ---, 34.1 mF/cm2 | 5000 cycles, C 93% retained |
Figure 14Main modification methods of tungsten oxide-based materials applied in electrochemical applications.
Figure 15(a) The galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles of the urchin-like WO3@PANI electrode at current density of 0.2 A g−1; the photographs of (b) WO3 and WO3@PANI under different voltages; (c) the durability test of the urchin-like WO3@PANI composite film for 1200 cycles at a wavelength. Adapted with permission from [174]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2010. (d) Optical density variation with respect to the charge density at 633 nm. Adapted with permission from [177]. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2015. (e) Basic structure and mechanism of the in situ monitoring system composed of PANI//WO3 ECSCs and CsPbBr3 perovskite photodetector. Adapted with permission from [178]. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2019.
Figure 16Integration of electrochromic energy storing device (ECESD) with silicon-based solar cells. (a) The circuit diagram of the smart operating system; (b) from left to right, ECESD is charging by solar cell, one ECESD can independently drive an LCD screen and two ECESDs in series can lighten a red LED. Adapted with permission from [31]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2017.
Figure 17(a) Schematic diagram of the integrated system. Adapted with permission from [184]. Copyright Elsevier, 2019. (b) Schematic of charging routes for W18O49/PANI-EC battery. Adapted with permission from [187]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 18(a) Schematic diagrams of the trifunctional device; (b) photograph of the enlarged photoelectrochromic device (PECD) at the bleached state. Adapted with permission from [30].