| Literature DB >> 33801940 |
Nishi Mishra1, Manoj Kumar Tripathi1, Sushma Tiwari1, Niraj Tripathi2, Swapnil Sapre3, Ashok Ahuja1, Sharad Tiwari3.
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) is used in India mostly as a substantial fund of protein and oil, which makes the crop significantly important. Somaclonal variation has been researched as a base of additional variability for drought in soybean. In the present experiment calli/cell clumps/embryoids rose from immature and mature embryonic axis and cotyledons explants were exposed to different concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG6000). A discontinuous method proved to be superior as it permitted the calli/embryoids/cell clumps to regain their regeneration competence. A total of 64 (12.21%) plantlets of genotype JS335 and 78 (13.13%) of genotype JS93-05 were regenerated after four consequent subcultures on the selection medium with an effective lethal concentration of 20% PEG6000, and proliferated calli/embryoids/cell clumps were further subcultured on Murashige and Skoog regeneration medium supplemented with 0.5 mgL-1 each of α-napthalene acetic acid (NAA), 6-benzyladenine (BA) and Kinetin (Kn), 20.0 gL-1 sucrose and 7.5 gL-1 agar. Putative drought-tolerant plantlets were acquired from genotype JS93-05 (38) in more numbers compared to genotype JS335 (26). Random decamer primers confirmed the presence of variability between mother plants and regenerated plants from both the genotypes. Since these plantlets recovered from tolerant calli/embryoids/cell clumps selected from the medium supplemented with PEG6000, the possibility exists that these plants may prove to be tolerant against drought stress.Entities:
Keywords: callus culture; cell suspension culture; drought; in vitro selection; somaclone; soybean
Year: 2021 PMID: 33801940 PMCID: PMC8000259 DOI: 10.3390/plants10030517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Initial responses of immature and mature embryonic axis and cotyledon cultured on MS medium supplemented with different plant growth regulators in varying concentrations.
| S. | Culture Media | Plant Growth Regulator | Direct | Root | Callus | Non | Callus | Callus Texture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAA | 2,4-D | BAP | ||||||||
| 1. | MSN | 1.0 | - | - | - | + | + | - | Yellow greenish | Soft friable |
| 2. | MS2N | 2.0 | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | - | Yellow greenish | Soft friable |
| 3. | MS3N | 3.0 | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | - | Yellow greenish | Soft friable |
| 4. | MS4N | 4.0 | - | - | - | + | +++ | - | A mixture of yellow, green and whitish calli | Compact |
| 5. | MS5N | 5.0 | - | - | - | + | +++ | - | A mixture of yellow, green and whitish calli | Compact |
| 6. | MS6N | 6.0 | - | - | - | + | ++++ | - | Yellow/green | Compact. Large in size |
| 7. | MS8N | 8.0 | - | - | - | + | ++++ | + | Yellow/green | Compact. Larger in size |
| 8. | MS10N | 10.0 | - | - | - | + | ++++ | ++ | Dark yellow | Compact. Largest in size |
| 9. | MSD | - | 1.0 | - | - | + | ++ | + | Yellowish | Soft friable. Callus covered with white boundaries |
| 10. | MS 2D | - | 2.0 | - | - | + | +++ | + | Yellowish | Soft friable. Callus covered with white boundaries |
| 11. | MS 5 D | - | 5.0 | - | - | + | ++++ | + | Yellowish | Soft friable. Callus covered with white boundaries |
| 12. | MS10D | - | 10.0 | - | - | Rare | ++++ | ++ | Yellowish | Soft friable. Callus covered with white boundaries |
| 13. | MS20D | - | 20.0 | - | - | Rare | ++++ | +++ | Yellowish/white | Covered with dense layer of white loose calluses |
| 14. | MS30D | - | 30.0 | -- | - | Very rare | ++++ | +++ | Yellowish/white | Covered with dense white loose calluses. Comparatively large in size |
| 15. | MS40D | - | 40.0 | - | - | Very rare | ++++ | +++ | Yellowish/dark brown | Covered with dense layer of brown loose calluses. Largest in size |
| 16. | MSB | - | - | 1.0 | + | + | + | - | Green | Compact. Covered with white layers of loose calluses |
| 17. | MS2B | - | - | 2.0 | + | Rare | ++ | - | Green | Compact. Covered with white layers of loose calluses |
| 18. | MS3B | - | - | 3.0 | ++ | Rare | +++ | - | Green | Compact. Covered with white layers of calluses |
| 19. | MS4B | - | - | 4.0 | ++ | Very rare | +++ | - | Green whitish | Compact. Covered with white layers of calli |
| 20. | MS5B | - | - | 5.0 | - | Very rare | +++ | - | Green. After 2–3 weeks of initial culture colour of calli changed in black | Compact. Covered with white layers of calluses |
Response: Excellent: >75% (+ + + +); High: 50–75% (+ + +); moderate: 25–50% (+ +); low: <25% (+).
Figure 1Plant regeneration from cell suspension culture in soybean: (A) Initiation of cell clumps and embryoid formation derived from embryogenic calli of genotype JS335. (B,C) Globular stage embryoid of genotype JS335. (D) Initiation of cell clumps and embryoid formation derived from embryogenic calli of genotype JS93-05. (E,F) Globular stage embryoid of genotype JS93-05. (G) Heart stage. (H) Torpedo stage. (I,J) Cotyledonary stage. (K) Typical bipolar embryoid. (L) Germination of bipolar embryoid. (M) Multiple embryoid. (N) Germination of multiple embryoid. (O) Typical multi-polar embryoid. (P) Germination of multipolar embryoid.
Combined effects of added cytokinins and auxins in varying concentrations and combinations on proliferation of embryogenic cell suspension cultures.
| Plant Growth Regulators mgL−1 | Cell Suspension Cultures | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embryonic Axis Derived Calli | Cotyledon Derived Calli | ||||||||||
| 2,4-D | NAA | BA | JS335 | JS93-05 | JS335 | JS93-05 | |||||
| Increment | RG | Increment | RG | Increment | RG | Increment | RG | ||||
|
| - | - | - | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 100 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 108 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 102 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 110 |
| MSDN.5B | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.12 ± 0.14 | 112 | 1.18 ± 0.16 | 118 | 1.20 ± 0.20 | 120 | 1.28 ± 0.22 | 128 |
| MS2DN.5B | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.24 ± 0.18 | 124 | 1.33 ± 0.20 | 133 | 1.30 ± 0.18 | 130 | 1.40 ± 0.22 | 140 |
| MS3DN.5B | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.46 ± 0.24 | 146 | 1.52 ± 0.24 | 152 | 1.68 ± 0.28 | 168 | 1. 84 ± 0.28 | 184 |
| MS4DN.5B | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.62 ± 0.26 | 162 | 1.74 ± 0.27 | 174 | 1.77 ± 0.29 | 177 | 1.92 ± 0.29 | 192 |
| MS5DN.5B | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.94 ± 0.30 | 194 | 208 ± 0.32 | 208 | 2.12 ± 0.34 | 212 | 2.26 ± 0.26 | 226 |
| MS10DN.5B | 10.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| MS2D2N.5B | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.42 ± 0.20 | 142 | 1.53± 0.22 | 153 | 1.47 ± 0.22 | 147 | 1.58 ± 0.24 | 158 |
| MS3D2N.5B | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.67 ± 0.26 | 167 | 1.74 ± 0.26 | 174 | 1.83 ± 0.30 | 183 | 1. 98 ± 0.31 | 198 |
| MS4D2N.5B | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.85 ± 0.28 | 185 | 1.92 ± 0.29 | 192 | 1.96 ± 0.31 | 196 | 2.22 ± 0.32 | 222 |
| MS5D2N.5B | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 2.07 ± 0.30 | 207 | 2.12 ± 0.31 | 212 | 2.16 ± 0.33 | 216 | 2.41 ± 0.34 | 241 |
| MS10D2N.5B | 10.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| |
| MS2D3N.5B | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 154 ± 0.24 | 154 | 1.72± 0.24 | 172 | 1.66 ± 0.24 | 166 | 1.79 ± 0.26 | 179 |
| MS4D3N.5B | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 2.04 ± 0.30 | 204 | 2.15 ± 0.32 | 215 | 2.18± 0.33 | 218 | 2.42 ± 0.34 | 242 |
| MS5D3N.5B | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 2.16 ± 0.34 | 216 | 2.30 ± 0.36 | 230 | 2.37 ± 0.35 | 237 | 2.52 ± 0.38 | 252 |
| MS10D3N.5B | 10.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 |
|
|
| - |
| - | ||
| MS2D5N.5B | 2.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 169 ± 0.26 | 169 | 1.83± 0.26 | 183 | 1.87 ± 0.26 | 187 | 2.01 ± 0.28 | 201 |
| MS3D5N.5B | 3.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1.88 ± 0.28 | 188 | 1.96 ± 0.28 | 196 | 2.04 ± 0.32 | 204 | 2.21 ± 0.34 | 221 |
| MS5D5N.5B | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 2.43 ± 0.36 | 243 | 2.54 ± 0.38 | 254 | 2.68 ± 0.39 | 268 | 2.81 ± 0.40 | 281 |
| MS10D5N.5B | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| MS5D10N.5B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 2.26 ± 0.32 | 226 | 2.41 ± 0.33 | 241 | 2.44 ± 0.37 | 244 | 2.62 ± 0.36 | 262 |
Evaluation was made after 35 days in culture. Initial fresh weight was taken 1.0 g per flask containing 50 mL liquid medium. FW: Fresh Weight; RG: Relative growth; CM: Cell Mortality. * Mean of five readings ± standard deviation.
Comparison of growth rates 1 of mature and immature embryonic axis and cotyledons derived calli and embryogenic cell suspension cultures on different levels of PEG6000.
| Concentration of PEG6000 | Relative Growth Rate of Callus Cultures 1 | Relative Growth Rate of Suspension Cultures 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JS335 | JS93-05 | JS335 | JS93-05 | |
| 0.0 | 100.00 ± 0.38 | 100.00 ± 0.40 | 100.00 ± 0.36 | 100.00 ± 0.39 |
| 5.0 | 85.34 ± 0.32 | 87.91 ± 0.30 | 80.52 ± 0.34 | 88.78 ± 0.34 |
| 10.0 | 65.13 ± 0.26 | 68.48 ± 0.28 | 69.86 ± 0.30 | 75.86 ± 0.32 |
| 15.0 | 63.52 ± 0.24 | 65.68 ± 0.25 | 61.52 ± 0.26 | 66.34 ± 0.29 |
| 20.0 | 51.12 ± 0.22 | 52.19 ± 0.24 | 49.18 ± 0.24 | 52.40 ± 0.26 |
| 25.0 | 21.98 ± 0.20 | 23.78 ± 0.22 | 22.56 ± 0.22 | 25.84 ± 0.20 |
| 30.0 | 9.75 ± 0.16 | 11.54 ± 0.18 | 12.90 ± 0.16 | 14.62 ± 0.18 |
Mean was obtained from weights of five inoculums/treatments after 35 days of initial culture. 1,2 Callus and cell suspension cultures on MS medium fortified with each of 5.0 mgL−1 2, 4-D, NAA, 0.5 mgL−1 BA and different levels of PEG6000.Callus and cell growth appeared average fresh weight.
Figure 2Effect of different concentrations of PEG6000 on survival of calli and formation of nonembryogenic/nonregenerable (A–G) and embryogenic/regenerable (H–N) callus in selection medium in soybean. (A) PEG6000 0% (w/v); (B) PEG6000 5% (w/v); (C) PEG6000 10% (w/v); (D) PEG6000 15% (w/v); (E) PEG6000 20% (w/v); (F) PEG6000 25% (w/v); (G) PEG6000 30% (w/v); (H) PEG6000 0% (w/v); (I) PEG6000 5% (w/v); (J) PEG6000 10% (w/v); (K) PEG6000 15% (w/v); (L) PEG6000 20% (w/v); M.PEG6000 25% (w/v); (N) PEG6000 30% (w/v).
Figure 3Effect of different concentrations of PEG6000 on survival of clumps/embryoids in liquid selection medium in soybean. (A) PEG6000 0% (w/v); (B) PEG6000 5% (w/v); (C,D) PEG6000 10% (w/v); (E,F) PEG6000 15% (w/v); (G,H) PEG6000 20% (w/v); (I,J) PEG6000.
Response of mature and immature embryonic axis and cotyledons derived calli of soybean to the lethal concentration of PEG6000.
| Cultivar | Number of Calli Cultured | Number of Surviving Calli after 4 Selection Cycles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 500 | 184 | 163 | 148 | 136 |
|
| 550 | 206 | 187 | 169 | 160 |
|
| |||||
|
| 600 | 237 (39.50%) | - |
| 212 |
|
| 650 | 267 | - | - | 247 |
Calli were cultured on selection medium (MS medium fortified with 5.0 mgL−1 2, 4-D, 5.0 mgL−1 NAA, 0.5 mgL−1 BA and 20% (w/v) PEG6000).
Response of cell clumps/embryoids obtained from embryogenic cell suspension culture of soybean to the lethal concentration of PEG6000.
| Cultivar | Number of Cell Clumps/Embryoids Cultured | Number of Surviving Cell Clumps/Embryoids after Selection Cycles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 975 | 331 | 297 | 271 | 244 |
|
| 1025 | 368 | 334 | 306 | 288 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1000 | 345 | - |
| 324 |
|
| 1050 | 397 | - | - | 362 |
Calli/cell clumps/embryoids were cultured on selection medium (liquid MS medium fortified with 5.0 mgL−1 2, 4-D, 5.0 mgL−1 NAA, 0.5 mgL−1 BA and 20% (w/v) PEG6000).
Regeneration frequency and survival percentage of soybean tolerant calli/cell clumps/embryoids against drought.
| Genotypes | Calli/Cell | Plants Regenerated | Survival after Hardening in Poly House |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 524 | 64 (12.21%) | 26 (40.65%) |
|
| 594 | 78 (13.13%) | 38 (48.71%) |
Calli/cell clumps/embryoids were cultured on regeneration medium (MS medium fortified with each of 0.5 mgL−1 NAA, BAP and kinetin, 200 gL−1 sucrose and 7.5 gL−1 agar powder).
Figure 4Effect of different concentrations of PEG6000 on regeneration of plantlets obtained from tolerant calli/cell clumps/embryoids in soybean. (A) PEG6000 0% (w/v); (B) PEG6000 5% (w/v); (C) PEG6000 10% (w/v); (D) PEG6000 15% (w/v); (E) PEG6000 20% (w/v); (F) PEG6000 25% (w/v); (G) PEG6000 30% (w/v); (H,I) Rooting of regenerants; (J) Regenrant transferred in greenhouse for hardening;(K,L) Regenerants transferred in nethouse for hardening.
Details of RAPD primers used for confirmation of selected putative drought tolerant plants.
| Primer | Sequence 5’-3’ | JS335 | JS93-05 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Bands | Polymorphic Bands | Total Bands | Polymorphic Bands | ||
| OPA-5 | AGGGGTCTTG | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| OPA-8 | GTGACGTAGG | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| OPC-10 | TGTCTGGGTG | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| OPC-15 | GACGGATCAG | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| OPAP-07 | ACCACCCGCT | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| OPAP-13 | TGAAGCCCCT | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| OPR-15 | GGACAACGAG | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| OPM 05 | GGGAACGTGT | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| OPM-12 | CTGGGCAACT | 7 | 0 | 9 | 3 |
| OPN 13 | GGTGGTCAAG | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
Figure 5(a) Electrophoretic banding pattern of 1:JS335 and 2 to 27 selected putative drought tolerant plants amplified with Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA primer OPN-13. (b) Electrophoretic banding pattern of 1:JS93-05 and 2 t0 39 selected putative drought tolerant plants amplified with RAPD primer OPN-13.