Won Ju Hwang1, Ji Sun Ha1, Mi Jeong Kim2. 1. College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea. 2. School of Architecture, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scoping reviews of the literature on the development and application of mental health apps based on theoretical suggestions are lacking. This study systematically examines studies on the effects and results of mental health mobile apps for the general adult population. METHODS: Following PICOs (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study design), a general form of scoping review was adopted. From January 2010 to December 2019, we selected the effects of mental health-related apps and intervention programs provided by mobile to the general adult population over the age of 18. Additionally, evaluation of methodological quality was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) checklist. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were analyzed of 1205 that were identified; duplicate and matching studies were excluded. One was a descriptive study and 13 were experimental, of which randomized control trials (RCTs) accounted for 71.4%. Four of the mobile apps were developed based on cognitive behavior theory, one based on stress theory, and one on ecological instant intervention theory. These apps included breathing training, meditation, and music therapy. Stress, depression, and anxiety decreased using these apps, and some were effective for well-being. CONCLUSION: With the rapid development of technology related to mental health, many mobile apps are developed, but apps based on theoretical knowledge and well-designed research are lacking. Further research and practices should be conducted to develop, test, and disseminate evidence-based mHealth for mental health promotion. RCT studies are needed to expand the application to mental health services to various populations.
BACKGROUND: Scoping reviews of the literature on the development and application of mental health apps based on theoretical suggestions are lacking. This study systematically examines studies on the effects and results of mental health mobile apps for the general adult population. METHODS: Following PICOs (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study design), a general form of scoping review was adopted. From January 2010 to December 2019, we selected the effects of mental health-related apps and intervention programs provided by mobile to the general adult population over the age of 18. Additionally, evaluation of methodological quality was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) checklist. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were analyzed of 1205 that were identified; duplicate and matching studies were excluded. One was a descriptive study and 13 were experimental, of which randomized control trials (RCTs) accounted for 71.4%. Four of the mobile apps were developed based on cognitive behavior theory, one based on stress theory, and one on ecological instant intervention theory. These apps included breathing training, meditation, and music therapy. Stress, depression, and anxiety decreased using these apps, and some were effective for well-being. CONCLUSION: With the rapid development of technology related to mental health, many mobile apps are developed, but apps based on theoretical knowledge and well-designed research are lacking. Further research and practices should be conducted to develop, test, and disseminate evidence-based mHealth for mental health promotion. RCT studies are needed to expand the application to mental health services to various populations.
Entities:
Keywords:
m-health; mental health app; mobile app; mobile mental health; stress management
Authors: Maged N Kamel Boulos; Ann C Brewer; Chante Karimkhani; David B Buller; Robert P Dellavalle Journal: Online J Public Health Inform Date: 2014-02-05
Authors: David C Mohr; Kathryn Noth Tomasino; Emily G Lattie; Hannah L Palac; Mary J Kwasny; Kenneth Weingardt; Chris J Karr; Susan M Kaiser; Rebecca C Rossom; Leland R Bardsley; Lauren Caccamo; Colleen Stiles-Shields; Stephen M Schueller Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Nadia Minian; Anika Saiva; Allison Gayapersad; Rosa Dragonetti; Catherine Proulx; Patricia Debergue; Julia Lecce; Sarwar Hussain; Eric Desjardins; Peter Selby Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-05-12