| Literature DB >> 33801354 |
Valeria Rizzo1, Sara Lombardo1, Gaetano Pandino1, Riccardo N Barbagallo1, Agata Mazzaglia1, Cristina Restuccia1, Giovanni Mauromicale1, Giuseppe Muratore1.
Abstract
Two globe artichoke genotypes, "Spinoso sardo" and "Opera F1", have been processed as ready-to-cook (RTC) slices and refrigerated at 4 °C for 12 days (i) to evaluate the suitability to be processed as RTC slices; (ii) to evaluate the effect of aEntities:
Keywords: antioxidants’ retention; essential oil emitter; globe artichoke genotype; microbial growth; quality parameters
Year: 2021 PMID: 33801354 PMCID: PMC8001857 DOI: 10.3390/foods10030517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Mean square as absolute value and percentage of total (in brackets) of effects resulting from analysis of variance.
| (a) |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Genotype (G) | 1 | 0.13 *** | 4.20 NS | 4.10 NS | 43.01 * | 2485 *** | 304 *** | 347.49 * | 0.03 NS | 1.87 NS | 0.04 NS | 0.81 NS | |
| Treatment (T) | 1 | 0.6 *** | 0.0 NS | 20.11 * | 118.20 ** | 1300 *** | 112 *** | 89.28 NS | 1.19 ** | 5.74 NS | 1.06 NS | 2.11 NS | |
| Storage time (St) | 3 | 3.54 *** | 80.56 *** | 30.31 ** | 698.14 *** | 11,577 *** | 321 *** | 113.75 NS | 7.35 *** | 104.1 ** | 37.54 *** | 45.41 *** | |
| (G) × (T) | 1 | 0.0 NS | 10.89 NS | 2.28 NS | 1.58 NS | 4.5 NS | 0.08 NS | 10.27 NS | 0.49 NS | 0.31 NS | 0.11 NS | 0.77 NS | |
| (G) × (St) | 3 | 0.33 *** | 15.90 * | 3.32 NS | 33.23 * | 118 NS | 32 *** | 333.91 * | 0.14 NS | 7.51 NS | 2.88 NS | 2.11 * | |
| (T) × (St) | 3 | 0.36 *** | 16.26 * | 6.91 NS | 6.45 * | 815 *** | 21 *** | 338.91 * | 0.09 NS | 1.04 NS | 0.40 NS | 6.12 *** | |
| (G) × (T) × (St) | 3 | 0.12 *** | 11.21 NS | 3.13 NS | 4.89 NS | 5.2 NS | 7 NS | 502.20 ** | 0.95 ** | 9.89 NS | 4.10 NS | 0.62 NS | |
| Total mean square | 5.07 | 139.02 | 70.16 | 905.49 | 16,306 | 798 | 1735.81 | 10.24 | 130.46 | 46.13 | 57.95 | ||
| (b) |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Genotype (G) | 1 | 11.59 *** | 17.66 *** | 33.84 *** | 4.69 *** | 4.13 *** | 2.12 *** | 4.14 *** | |||||
| Treatment (T) | 1 | 1.06 *** | 1.06 *** | 0.77 *** | 0.49 *** | 1.75 *** | 7.51 *** | 1.58 *** | |||||
| Storage time (St) | 3 | 7.74 *** | 9.49 *** | 22.70 *** | 13.46 *** | 30.07 *** | 26.70 *** | 9.19 *** | |||||
| (G) × (T) | 1 | 8 × 10−4 NS | 0.02 *** | 0.03 *** | 0.07 *** | 0.29 *** | 1.07 *** | 0.09 NS | |||||
| (G) × (St) | 3 | 0.53 *** | 0.22 *** | 0.40 *** | 0.37 *** | 3.49 *** | 8.46 *** | 2.07 *** | |||||
| (T) × (St) | 3 | 0.12 *** | 0.13 *** | 0.09 *** | 0.10 *** | 0.16 *** | 2.22 *** | 1.12 *** | |||||
| (G) × (T) × (St) | 3 | 0.03 *** | 0.04 *** | 0.03 *** | 0.03 *** | 0.18 *** | 0.63 *** | 0.02 NS | |||||
| Total mean square | 21.07 | 28.62 | 57.86 | 19.21 | 40.07 | 48.71 | 18.21 | ||||||
Note: ML: Mass loss; TPC: Total polyphenol content; AsAC: Ascorbic acid content; AA: Antioxidant activity; Text: Texture (Fmax); color parameters (L*, a*, b*); ∆E: total color difference; df: Degrees of freedom. MB: Mesophilic bacteria; PB: Psychrotrophic bacteria; YM: Yeasts and molds; PPO: Polyphenol oxidase; *, ** and *** indicate significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, and NS, not significant.
Qualitative traits of ready-to-cook (RTC) globe artichoke slices as affected by the main factors under study.
| (a) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Genotype | ||||||||||||
|
| 1.62 a | 4.57 a | 12.26 a | 21.26 a | 118 a | 56.6 a | 63.83 a | 92.80 a | 2.17 a | 0.31 a | 2.79 a | |
|
| 1.49 b | 5.29 a | 12.98 a | 18.94 b | 100 b | 50.4 b | 57.24 b | 92.87 a | 2.65 a | 0.24 a | 3.11 a | |
| Treatment | ||||||||||||
| Control | 1.42 b | 4.94 a | 13.41 a | 18.18 b | 103 b | 51.6 b | 62.20 a | 93.03 a | 1.98 a | 0.46 a | 2.69 a | |
| Essential oil | 1.69 a | 4.92 a | 11.83 b | 22.02 a | 116 a | 55.4 a | 58.86 a | 92.65 b | 2.83 a | 0.09 a | 3.21 a | |
| Storage time (day) | ||||||||||||
| 0 | 0.62 d | 9.24 a | 11.36 b | 31.6 a | 165 a | 61.7 a | 64.82 a | 93.26 b | 3.43 a | −0.53 b | - | |
| 5 | 1.56 c | 2.14 c | 14.77 a | 23.78 b | 102 b | 55.3 b | 55.80 a | 92.03 c | 4.47 a | −0.92 b | 3.65 b | |
| 8 | 1.77 b | 3.02 b,c | 13.77 a | 13.15 c | 90 c | 48.8 c | 59.79 a | 93.99 a | −2.93 b | 3.51 a | 5.70 a | |
| 12 | 2.18 a | 5.33 b | 10.61 b | 11.87 c | 80 d | 48.2 c | 61.71 a | 92.07 c | 4.68 a | −0.95 b | 2.46 c | |
| (b) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Genotype | ||||||||||||
|
| 3.89 b | 3.64 b | 3.13 b | 4.53 b | 1.64 b | 4.12 b | 2.65 b | |||||
|
| 5.09 a | 5.13 a | 5.18 a | 5.30 a | 2.23 a | 4.84 a | 3.37 a | |||||
| Treatment | ||||||||||||
| Control | 4.68 a | 4.57 a | 4.31 a | 5.04 a | 2.15 a | 4.72 a | 3.23 a | |||||
| Essential oil | 4.31 b | 4.20 b | 4 b | 4.79 b | 1.72 b | 4.25 b | 2.79 b | |||||
| Storage time (day) | ||||||||||||
| 0 | 3.21 d | 3.23 d | 1.8 d | 3.07 d | 0.8 d | 1.63 c | 2.01 b | |||||
| 5 | 4.33 c | 3.99 c | 4.08 c | 4.96 c | 1.68 c | 4.93 b | 4.03 a | |||||
| 8 | 4.92 b | 4.51 b | 5.28 b | 5.70 b | 2.35 b | 5.70 a | 3.83 a | |||||
| 12 | 5.52 a | 5.82 a | 5.46 a | 5.92 a | 2.91 a | 5.68 a | 2.16 b | |||||
Note: ML: Mass loss; TPC: Total polyphenol content; AsAC: Ascorbic acid content; AA: Antioxidant activity; Text: Texture (Fmax); color parameters (L*, a*, b*); ∆E: total color difference. MB: Mesophilic bacteria; PB: Psychrotrophic bacteria; YM: Yeasts and molds; PPO: Polyphenol oxidase. Different letters within the same qualitative trait and main factor show significant differences (LSD test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1Mass loss (%) of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × post-harvest treatment × storage time” interaction. O: “Opera F1”; SS: “Spinoso sardo”; C: Control; EO: Samples packed with essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 2Oxygen (%) of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × storage time” (a); “post-harvest treatment × storage time” (b); interaction. O: “Opera F1”; SS: “Spinoso sardo”; C: control; essential oil (EO): Samples packed with essential oil of F. vulgare. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 3Color parameters of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × post-harvest treatment × storage time”(a) “genotype × storage time” (b); “post-harvest treatment × storage time”(c) interaction. L*: Lightness; ΔE* = total color difference; O: “Opera F1”; SS: “Spinoso sardo”; C: control; EO: Samples packed with essential oil of F. vulgare. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 4Texture (N) of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × post-harvest treatment × storage time” interaction. O: “Opera F1”; SS: “Spinoso sardo”; C: Control; EO: Samples packed with essential oil of F. vulgare. Data are showed as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 5Chemical traits of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “post-harvest treatment × storage time” interaction. TPC: Total polyphenol content; AsAC: Ascorbic acid content; AA: Antioxidant activity; C: Control; EO: Samples packed with essential oil of F. vulgare. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 6Chemical traits of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × storage time” interaction. TPC: Total polyphenol content; AA: Antioxidant activity; O: “Opera F1”; SS: “Spinoso sardo”. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 7PPO activity of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × storage time” (a) and “treatment × storage time” (b) interaction. PPO: Polyphenol oxidase; O: “Opera F1”; SS: “Spinoso sardo”.C: Control; EO: Samples packed with essential oil of F. vulgare. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Figure 8Microbiological parameters of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by “genotype × post-harvest treatment × storage time” interaction. LSDinteraction (p ≤ 0.05): 0.06 (total mesophilic bacteria, MB); 0.07 (total psychrotrophic bacteria, PB); 0.05 (yeasts and molds, YM); 0.07 (Enterobacteria, TEB); 0.08 (Pseudomonas spp.); 0.08 (E. coli). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Mean scores of the significant sensory attributes of RTC globe artichoke slices as affected by genotype and post-harvest treatment under study.
| Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage Time (d) | Attribute | C | EO | ||
| “Opera F1” | “Spinoso sardo” | “Opera F1” | “Spinoso sardo” | ||
| 0 | Fennel odor | 1.0 a,1 | 1.0 a | 3.2 b | 3.4 b |
| Fennel flavor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 3.4 b | 3.3 b | |
| 5 | Fennel odor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 3.6 b | 4.5 b |
| Bitter | 4.8 b | 2.7 a | 3.2 ab | 2.5 a | |
| Fennel flavor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 3.9 b | 4.3 b | |
| 8 | Fennel odor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 2.6 b | 4.5 c |
| Fennel flavor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 3.2 b | 5.1 c | |
| 12 | Fennel odor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 3.6 b | 3.3 b |
| Fennel flavor | 1.0 a | 1.0 a | 3.9 b | 3.8 b | |
1 Values marked with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the LSD test. C: Control; EO: Samples packed with essential oil of F. vulgare.