| Literature DB >> 33801006 |
Zuzana Feketeová1, Andrej Hrabovský1, Ivan Šimkovic1.
Abstract
Tailings-derived soils formed fromEntities:
Keywords: microbial indicators; recovery; soil microorganisms; tailings derived soils; toxic metals
Year: 2021 PMID: 33801006 PMCID: PMC8003828 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location of sampling areas in the map of Slovakia: Slovinky (SLS-slag, SLD-dam), Markušovce (MAS-sludge, MAD-dam), Lintich (LIS-sludge, LID-dam), Horná Ves (HVS-sludge, HVD-dam).
Figure 2Images show the restored tailings ponds: 1—Slovinky (SLS, SLD), 2—Markušovce (MAS, MAD), 3—Lintich (LIS, LID), 4—Horná Ves (HVS, HVD). SLS—Slovinky slag; SLD—Slovinky dam; MAS—Markušovce sludge; MAD—Markušovce dam; LIS—Lintich sludge; SLD—Linitch dam; HVS—Horná Ves sludge; HVD—Horná Ves dam.
Risk elements concentrations in the samples of studied substrates.
| Sample (µg/g) | As | Ba | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLS | 428.0 | 9155.0 | 2.6 | 546.0 | 3678.0 | 9086.6 | 565.6 | 4200.5 | 25,593.0 | |
| SLD | 161.0 | 1103.0 | 0.9 | 82.0 | 1058.0 | 2236.4 | 165.0 | 647.6 | 6425.0 | |
| MAS | 141.0 | 7857.0 | <0.5 | 14.0 | 89.0 | 667.8 | 50.3 | 11.8 | 37.0 | |
| MAD | 47.0 | 7186.0 | <0.5 | 9.0 | 72.0 | 483.8 | 36.5 | 2.1 | 19.0 | |
| LIS | 10.0 | 1786.0 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 324.2 | 6.3 | 965.8 | 2150.0 | |
| LID | 13.0 | 1114.0 | 20.9 | 7.0 | 17.0 | 395.1 | 7.3 | 977.1 | 3202.0 | |
| HVS | 576.0 | 251.0 | 52.0 | 93.0 | 16.0 | 3792.4 | 28.0 | 16054.7 | 9096.0 | |
| HVD | 117.0 | 116.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 28.6 | 4.9 | 91.9 | 53.0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rv—reference value (µg/g) represents the maximum permissible concentration of a hazardous substance in the soil set by Act No. 220/2004 Protection and Utilization of Agricultural Soil by Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic. SLS–Slovinky slag; SLD–Slovinky dam; MAS–Markušovce sludge; MAD–Markušovce dam; LIS–Lintich sludge; SLD–Linitch dam; HVS–Horná Ves sludge; HVD–Horná Ves dam.
Chemical and microbiological properties of the substrates.
| Sample | pH | pH | Corg | Ntot | C/N | MBC | CO2B | CO2P | w | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (H2O) | (KCl) | % | % | mg C/g | mgCO2/g | mgCO2/g | % | |||
| SLS | Mean | 8.72 | 8.32 | 1.46 | 0.018 | 81.11 | 0.315 | 0.031 | 0.064 | 12.11 |
| SD | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.007 | 49.49 | 0.078 | 0.009 | 0.031 | 1.99 | |
| SLD | Mean | 8.32 | 8.19 | 1.33 | 0.028 | 47.50 | 1.369 | 0.036 | 0.112 | 17.54 |
| SD | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.007 | 7.32 | 0.113 | 0.007 | 0.072 | 0.43 | |
| MAS | Mean | 8.25 | 8.13 | 1.90 | 0.039 | 47.50 | 1.884 | 0.121 | 0.082 | 14.4 |
| SD | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.28 | <0.001 | 6.89 | 0.840 | 0.088 | 0.281 | 0.43 | |
| MAD | Mean | 8.45 | 8.68 | 3.12 | 0.034 | 115.56 | 2.299 | 0.073 | 0.116 | 13.75 |
| SD | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.47 | <0.001 | 27.23 | 0.192 | 0.007 | 0.029 | 3.58 | |
| LIS | Mean | 8.04 | 7.95 | 0.42 | 0.026 | 16.15 | 1.270 | 0.100 | 0.118 | 11.00 |
| SD | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.007 | 1.09 | 0.018 | 0.061 | 0.047 | 3.85 | |
| LID | Mean | 8.09 | 7.99 | 1.88 | 0.202 | 9.31 | 1.275 | 0.089 | 0.139 | 6.34 |
| SD | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.98 | 0.063 | 4.90 | 0.016 | 0.030 | 0.028 | 1.61 | |
| HVS | Mean | 2.06 | 1.85 | 1.44 | 0.039 | 36.92 | 1.190 | 0.009 | 0.048 | 20.25 |
| SD | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.15 | <0.001 | 3.81 | 0.307 | 0.001 | 0.039 | 6.29 | |
| HVD | Mean | 4.53 | 3.76 | 1.29 | 0.118 | 11.52 | 1.370 | 0.048 | 0.610 | 20.94 |
| SD | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.007 | 1.51 | 0.081 | 0.037 | 0.172 | 5.75 | |
pH (H2O/KCL)—negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration, Corg—total organic carbon, Ntot—total organic nitrogen, C/N—total organic carbon and nitrogen ratio, MBC—microbial biomass carbon (dry weight), CO2B—basal respiration (per 24 h), CO2P—potential respiration (per 24 h), w—water content in the sample.
Figure 3Correlation matrix describing the relations between microbial and chemical parameters of analyzed samples (blue dots represent positive correlation, and red ones represent negative; the bigger and darker is a dot, the strongest relationship between parameters was observed, dots in the box are indicating the significance at p < 0.05 level (pH * = pH(H2O), pH ** = pH (KCl)).
Figure 4Comparison of mean microbial quotients calculated for each site, during the sampling period, respectively; qMic (MBC/Corg)-the ratio of microbial biomass carbon (mg C/g) to soil organic carbon. Means ± standard deviation (SD) are presented.
Figure 5Comparison of mean metabolic quotients, calculated for each site during the sampling period, respectively; qCO2 × 100 (CO2B/MBC)–microbial respiration (mg CO2/g/h) per unit of microbial biomass carbon (mg C/g). Means ± SD are presented.
Figure 6Comparison of mean substrate availability indexes calculated for each sit during the sampling period, respectively; SAI (CO2-P/CO2-B)–Potential to basal microbial respiration (mg CO2/g/h) rate. Means ± SD are presented.
Figure 7Evolution of microbial biomass carbon (MBC) values (mg C/g) during four sampling seasons on each monitored locality–every color represents a sample: SLS (light blue), SLD (dark blue), MAS (light green), MAD (dark green), LIS (light red), LID (dark red), HVS (yellow), HVD (orange); the average values are shown in the figure for every season, the standard deviation of the means of seasons I–IV were as follows: SLS ± 0.07; 0.08; 0.06; 0.03, SLD ± 0.08; 0.04; 0.13; 0.14, MAS ± 0.04; 0.85; 0.14; 0.07, MAD ± 0.14; 0.13; 0.22; 0.08; LIS ± 0.11; 0.17; 0.11; 0.18, LID ± 0.16; 0.22; 0.12; 0.11, HVS ± 0.33; 0.19; 0.28; 0.18, HVD < 0.01; ±0.04; 0.06; 0.07.