| Literature DB >> 33800913 |
Jia Zhou1, Ziying Yang2,3, Jun Sun2,3, Lipei Liu2,3, Xinyao Zhou1, Fengxia Liu2,3, Ya Xing1, Shuge Cui2,3, Shiyi Xiong1, Xiaoyu Liu2,3, Yingjun Yang1, Xiuxiu Wei2,3, Gang Zou1, Zhonghua Wang2,3, Xing Wei1, Yaoshen Wang2,3, Yun Zhang1, Saiying Yan2,3, Fengyu Wu1, Fanwei Zeng2,4, Jian Wang5, Tao Duan1, Zhiyu Peng2, Luming Sun1.
Abstract
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful tool for postnatal genetic diagnosis, but relevant clinical studies in the field of prenatal diagnosis are limited. The present study aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of WGS compared with chromosomal microarray (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. We performed trio WGS (≈40-fold) in parallel with CMA in 111 fetuses with structural or growth anomalies, and sequentially performed WES when CMA was negative (CMA plus WES). In comparison, WGS not only detected all pathogenic genetic variants in 22 diagnosed cases identified by CMA plus WES, yielding a diagnostic rate of 19.8% (22/110), but also provided additional and clinically significant information, including a case of balanced translocations and a case of intrauterine infection, which might not be detectable by CMA or WES. WGS also required less DNA (100 ng) as input and could provide a rapid turnaround time (TAT, 18 ± 6 days) compared with that (31 ± 8 days) of the CMA plus WES. Our results showed that WGS provided more comprehensive and precise genetic information with a rapid TAT and less DNA required than CMA plus WES, which enables it as an alternative prenatal diagnosis test for fetal structural anomalies.Entities:
Keywords: chromosomal microarray; fetal structural anomalies; prenatal diagnosis; whole exome sequencing; whole genome sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800913 PMCID: PMC7999180 DOI: 10.3390/genes12030376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096