Literature DB >> 33800913

Whole Genome Sequencing in the Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies: A Parallel Test with Chromosomal Microarray Plus Whole Exome Sequencing.

Jia Zhou1, Ziying Yang2,3, Jun Sun2,3, Lipei Liu2,3, Xinyao Zhou1, Fengxia Liu2,3, Ya Xing1, Shuge Cui2,3, Shiyi Xiong1, Xiaoyu Liu2,3, Yingjun Yang1, Xiuxiu Wei2,3, Gang Zou1, Zhonghua Wang2,3, Xing Wei1, Yaoshen Wang2,3, Yun Zhang1, Saiying Yan2,3, Fengyu Wu1, Fanwei Zeng2,4, Jian Wang5, Tao Duan1, Zhiyu Peng2, Luming Sun1.   

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful tool for postnatal genetic diagnosis, but relevant clinical studies in the field of prenatal diagnosis are limited. The present study aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of WGS compared with chromosomal microarray (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. We performed trio WGS (≈40-fold) in parallel with CMA in 111 fetuses with structural or growth anomalies, and sequentially performed WES when CMA was negative (CMA plus WES). In comparison, WGS not only detected all pathogenic genetic variants in 22 diagnosed cases identified by CMA plus WES, yielding a diagnostic rate of 19.8% (22/110), but also provided additional and clinically significant information, including a case of balanced translocations and a case of intrauterine infection, which might not be detectable by CMA or WES. WGS also required less DNA (100 ng) as input and could provide a rapid turnaround time (TAT, 18 ± 6 days) compared with that (31 ± 8 days) of the CMA plus WES. Our results showed that WGS provided more comprehensive and precise genetic information with a rapid TAT and less DNA required than CMA plus WES, which enables it as an alternative prenatal diagnosis test for fetal structural anomalies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosomal microarray; fetal structural anomalies; prenatal diagnosis; whole exome sequencing; whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33800913      PMCID: PMC7999180          DOI: 10.3390/genes12030376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


  37 in total

1.  Characteristics and mode of inheritance of pathogenic copy number variants in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Matthew Hoi Kin Chau; Ye Cao; Yvonne Ka Yin Kwok; Samantha Chan; Yiu Man Chan; Huilin Wang; Zhenjun Yang; Hoi Kin Wong; Tak Yeung Leung; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic adjunct to clinical testing in fetuses with structural abnormalities.

Authors:  F Fu; R Li; Y Li; Z-Q Nie; T Lei; D Wang; X Yang; J Han; M Pan; L Zhen; Y Ou; J Li; F-T Li; X Jing; D Li; C Liao
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Jared C Roach; Gustavo Glusman; Arian F A Smit; Chad D Huff; Robert Hubley; Paul T Shannon; Lee Rowen; Krishna P Pant; Nathan Goodman; Michael Bamshad; Jay Shendure; Radoje Drmanac; Lynn B Jorde; Leroy Hood; David J Galas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Exome sequencing in developmental eye disease leads to identification of causal variants in GJA8, CRYGC, PAX6 and CYP1B1.

Authors:  Ivan Prokudin; Cas Simons; John R Grigg; Rebecca Storen; Vikrant Kumar; Zai Y Phua; James Smith; Maree Flaherty; Sonia Davila; Robyn V Jamieson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ronald J Wapner; Christa Lese Martin; Brynn Levy; Blake C Ballif; Christine M Eng; Julia M Zachary; Melissa Savage; Lawrence D Platt; Daniel Saltzman; William A Grobman; Susan Klugman; Thomas Scholl; Joe Leigh Simpson; Kimberly McCall; Vimla S Aggarwal; Brian Bunke; Odelia Nahum; Ankita Patel; Allen N Lamb; Elizabeth A Thom; Arthur L Beaudet; David H Ledbetter; Lisa G Shaffer; Laird Jackson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample.

Authors:  Michael E Talkowski; Zehra Ordulu; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Carol B Benson; Ian Blumenthal; Susan Connolly; Carrie Hanscom; Naveed Hussain; Shahrin Pereira; Jonathan Picker; Jill A Rosenfeld; Lisa G Shaffer; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; James F Gusella; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants.

Authors:  Tracy Brandt; Laura M Sack; Dolores Arjona; Duanjun Tan; Hui Mei; Hong Cui; Hua Gao; Lora J H Bean; Arunkanth Ankala; Daniela Del Gaudio; Amy Knight Johnson; Lisa M Vincent; Caitlin Reavey; Amy Lai; Gabriele Richard; Jeanne M Meck
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Comprehensive structural variation genome map of individuals carrying complex chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Jesper Eisfeldt; Maria Pettersson; Francesco Vezzi; Josephine Wincent; Max Käller; Joel Gruselius; Daniel Nilsson; Elisabeth Syk Lundberg; Claudia M B Carvalho; Anna Lindstrand
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetuses With Increased Nuchal Translucency by Genome Sequencing Analysis.

Authors:  Kwong Wai Choy; Huilin Wang; Mengmeng Shi; Jingsi Chen; Zhenjun Yang; Rui Zhang; Huanchen Yan; Yanfang Wang; Shaoyun Chen; Matthew Hoi Kin Chau; Ye Cao; Olivia Y M Chan; Yvonne K Kwok; Yuanfang Zhu; Min Chen; Tak Yeung Leung; Zirui Dong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Underlying genetic etiologies of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Daryl A Scott; Yoel Gofin; Aliska M Berry; April D Adams
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Clinical efficiency of simultaneous CNV-seq and whole-exome sequencing for testing fetal structural anomalies.

Authors:  Xinlin Chen; Yulin Jiang; Ruiguo Chen; Qingwei Qi; Xiujuan Zhang; Sheng Zhao; Chaoshi Liu; Weiyun Wang; Yuezhen Li; Guoqiang Sun; Jieping Song; Hui Huang; Chen Cheng; Jianguang Zhang; Longxian Cheng; Juntao Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rhiannon Mellis; Kathryn Oprych; Elizabeth Scotchman; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.242

Review 4.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.