| Literature DB >> 33800803 |
Ayman A Althuwayb1, Mohammad Alibakhshikenari2, Bal S Virdee3, Pancham Shukla3, Ernesto Limiti2.
Abstract
This research article describes a technique for realizing wideband dual notched functionality in an ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna array based on metamaterial and electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) techniques. For comparison purposes, a reference antenna array was initially designed comprising hexagonal patches that are interconnected to each other. The array was fabricated on standard FR-4 substrate with thickness of 0.8 mm. The reference antenna exhibited an average gain of 1.5 dBi across 5.25-10.1 GHz. To improve the array's impedance bandwidth for application in UWB systems metamaterial (MTM) characteristics were applied it. This involved embedding hexagonal slots in patch and shorting the patch to the ground-plane with metallic via. This essentially transformed the antenna to a composite right/left-handed structure that behaved like series left-handed capacitance and shunt left-handed inductance. The proposed MTM antenna array now operated over a much wider frequency range (2-12 GHz) with average gain of 5 dBi. Notched band functionality was incorporated in the proposed array to eliminate unwanted interference signals from other wireless communications systems that coexist inside the UWB spectrum. This was achieved by introducing electromagnetic bandgap in the array by etching circular slots on the ground-plane that are aligned underneath each patch and interconnecting microstrip-line in the array. The proposed techniques had no effect on the dimensions of the antenna array (20 mm × 20 mm × 0.87 mm). The results presented confirm dual-band rejection at the wireless local area network (WLAN) band (5.15-5.825 GHz) and X-band satellite downlink communication band (7.10-7.76 GHz). Compared to other dual notched band designs previously published the footprint of the proposed technique is smaller and its rejection notches completely cover the bandwidth of interfering signals.Entities:
Keywords: antennas; bandgap rejection; composite right/left-handed structures (CRLH); electromagnetic bandgap (EBG); metamaterials (MTM); ultra-wide band (UWB)
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800803 PMCID: PMC8001207 DOI: 10.3390/mi12030269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Geometry of the reference antenna: (a) top-side of substrate, (b) back-side of substrate (ground-lane), (c) simulated reflection-coefficient response, and (d) simulated radiation gain response.
Geometrical parameters of the reference antenna array.
| Parameters | Dimensions (mm) |
|---|---|
| Radius of hexagonal patches | 2 |
| Width of connecting lines | 0.5 |
| Horizontal gap between patches | 7.5 |
| Vertical gap between patches | 1.55 |
| Length of the central feedline | 10 |
| Width of the feedline | 0.5 |
Figure 2Photo-lithographic fabrication process to implement the antenna.
Figure 3Configuration of the proposed metamaterial (MTM) based antenna array: (a) top-side view of substrate, (b) back-side view of substrate (ground-plane), (c) isometric view showing all the structural components and their locations, (d) reflection-coefficient response of the reference and MTM antenna array, and (e) radiation gain of the reference and MTM antenna array.
Geometrical parameters of the MTM inspired ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna. (Note, all other parameters are given in Table 1.).
| Parameters | Dimensions (mm) |
|---|---|
| Radius of hexagonal slots | 1.25 |
| Width of hexagonal slots | 0.25 |
| Radius of via-holes | 0.25 |
| Height of via-holes | 0.85 |
Figure 4Layout of the proposed MTM based antenna array loaded with electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) slots: (a) top-side of substrate, (b) back-side of substrate (ground-plane), (c) isometric view showing the structural components and their locations, (d) reflection coefficient response comparison of the reference, MTM, and MTM with EBG loading, and (e) radiation gain of the reference, MTM, and MTM with EBG loading.
Geometrical parameters of the MTM inspired UWB antenna loaded with EBG slots. (Note, all other parameters are given in Table 1 and Table 2).
| Parameter | Dimensions (mm) |
|---|---|
| Radius of EBG slots | 0.2 |
| Gap between EBG slots | 0.5 |
Comparison with state-of-the-art UWB notched band antennas.
|
|
|
|
|
| Design Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 16 × 25 × 1.52 | Single | 0.71 | Yes | No |
| [ | 44 × 44.4 × 0.1 | Dual | 0.21 and 0.21 | No | No |
| [ | 48 × 50 × 1 | Single | 0.97 | Yes | No |
| [ | 50 × 50 × 1.575 | Dual | 0.24 and 0.48 | No | No |
| [ | 28 × 18 × 0.8 | Dual | 0.54 and 0.53 | No | Yes |
| [ | 38 × 42 × 0.5 | Single | 0.76 | No | Yes |
| [ | 8.5 × 22 × 0.8 | Single | 1.34 | No | Yes |
| Proposed Work | 20 × 20 × 0.87 | Dual | 1.14 and 1.41 | Yes | No |