| Literature DB >> 33800644 |
Hannah Wächter1, Erdal Yörük1, Karsten Becker1,2, Dennis Görlich3, Barbara C Kahl1.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a frequent, severe condition that occurs in patients of all age groups and affects clinical departments of all medical fields. It is associated with a high mortality rate of 20-30%. In this study, we analyzed patient mortality associated with SAB at our tertiary care university hospital, assessed the clinical management in terms of administered antimicrobial therapy, and determined which factors have an impact on the clinical course and outcome of patients with this disease. We collected clinical data and blood culture isolates of 178 patients diagnosed with SAB between May 2013 and July 2015. For this study, bacteria were cultured and analyzed concerning their phenotype, hemolysis activity, biofilm formation, nuclease activity, prevalence of toxin genes, spa and agr type. Overall mortality was 24.2% and 30-day mortality was 14.6%. Inadequate initial therapy was administered to 26.2% of patients and was associated with decreased survival (p = 0.041). Other factors associated with poor survival were patient age (p = 0.003), agr type 4 (p ≤ 0.001) and pathological leukocyte counts (p = 0.029 if elevated and p = 0.003 if lowered). The type of infection focus, spa clonal complex and enterotoxin genes seg and sei had an impact on severity of inflammation. Our results indicate that mortality and burden of disease posed by SAB are high at our university hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; agr type; bacteremia; biofilm; mortality; nuclease; spa type; toxin genes
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800644 PMCID: PMC8037130 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Antibiotic substances defined as adequate.
| First-Line Therapy | Second-Line Therapy |
|---|---|
|
1st generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefazolin) 2nd generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefuroxime) anti-staphylococcal penicillins (e.g., oxacillin, flucloxacillin) | linezolid |
Reference strains used in this study.
| Strain | Used in | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Delta-toxin assay | [ | |
| Delta-toxin assay | [ | |
| Delta-toxin assay | [ | |
| Biofilm assay | [ | |
| Biofilm assay | [ | |
| Nuclease assay | [ | |
| Nuclease assay | [ |
Primers used for spa typing and single and multiplex PCRs.
| Gene | Primer | Sequence (5′–3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| forward 1095F | AGACGATCCTTCGGTGAGC | [ |
| reverse 1517R | GCTTTTGCAATGTCATTTACTG | ||
|
| mec-5 forward | AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC | [ |
| mec-6 reverse | AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC | ||
|
| agrSA-KON1 forward | ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC | [ |
| agrSA1-2 reverse | GTCACAAGTACTATAAGCTGCGAT | ||
| agrSA2-2 reverse | TATTACTAATTGAAAAGTGCCATAGC | ||
| agrSA3-2 reverse | GTAATGTAATAGCTTGTATAATAATACCCAG | ||
| agrSA4-2 reverse | CGATAATGCCGTAATACCCG | ||
|
| sea-3 forward | CCTTTGGAAACGGTTAAAACG | [ |
| sea-4 reverse | TCTGAACCTTCCCATCAAAAAC | ||
|
| seb-1 forward | TCGCATCAAACTGACAAACG | [ |
| seb-4 reverse | GCAGGTACTCTATAAGTGCCTGC | ||
|
| sec-3 forward | CTCAAGAACTAGACATAAAAGCTAGG | [ |
| sec-4 reverse | TCAAAATCGGATTAACATTATCC | ||
|
| sed-3 forward | CTAGTTTGGTAATATCTCCTTTAAACG | [ |
| sed-4 reverse | TTAATGCTATATCTTATAGGGTAAACATC | ||
|
| see-2 forward | TAACTTACCGTGGACCCTTC | [ |
| see-3 reverse | CAGTACCTATAGATAAAGTTAAAACAAGC | ||
|
| seg-1 forward | AATGCTCAACCCGATCCTA | [ |
| seg-4 reverse | CTTCCTTCAACAGGTGGAGAC | ||
|
| seh-1 forward | TTAGAAATCAAGGTGATAGTGGC | [ |
| seh-2 reverse | TTTTGAATACCATCTACCCAAAC | ||
|
| sei-1 forward | GCCACTTTATCAGGACAATACTT | [ |
| sei-2 reverse | AAAACTTACAGGCAGTCCATCTC | ||
|
| sej-1 forward | CTCCCTGACGTTAACACTACTAATAA | [ |
| sej-2 reverse | TTGTCTGGATATTGACCTATAACATT | ||
|
| tst-3 foward | AAGCCCTTTGTTGCTTGCG | [ |
| tst-6 reverse | ATCGAACTTTGGCCCATACTTT | ||
|
| pvl-1 forward | ATCATTAGGTAAAATGTCTGGACATGATCCA | [ |
| pvl-2 reverse | GCATCAASTGTATTGGATAGCAAAAGC | ||
|
| hlg-1 forward | GCCAATCCGTTATTAGAAAATGC | [ |
| hlg-2 reverse | CCATAGAAGTAGCAACGGAT | ||
|
| eta-3 forward | CTAGTGCATTTGTTATTCAAGACG | [ |
| eta-4 reverse | TGCATTGACACCATAGTACTTATTC | ||
|
| etb-3 forward | ACGGCTATATACATTCAATTCAATG | [ |
| etb-4 reverse | AAAGTTATTCATTTAATGCACTGTCTC | ||
|
| etd-1 forward | AACTATCATGTATCAAGG | [ |
| etd-2 reverse | CAGAATTTCCCGACTCAG |
Patient characteristics and clinical data.
| Parameter | Data |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Age in years | |
| Age in categories, | |
| Infection focus, | |
| Presence of fever ≥38 °C | |
| CRP | |
| CRP categories | |
| Leukocyte count | |
| Leukocyte categories | |
| Mortality, | |
| - Median follow-up time in days (CI 3) | 21.0 (16.5–25.5) |
| - Median overall survival in days (CI) | 160.0 (75.2–244.8) |
| Initial antimicrobial therapy |
1IQR interquartile range, 2 SD standard deviation, 3 CI 95% confidence interval.
Isolate characteristics.
| Parameter | Data |
|---|---|
| Colony size, | |
| Alpha-toxin, | |
| Beta-toxin, | |
| Delta-toxin, | |
| Biofilm in % of the positive control | |
| Biofilm categories, | |
| Nuclease activity in RFU | |
| Methicillin resistance | |
| Prevalence of toxin genes |
Figure 1Histogram of the nuclease activity assay results. Nuclease activity was highly variable, but present in all isolates. Median nuclease activity was 528.6 RFU (IQR 358.8–743.9 RFU). The positive control showed a mean nuclease activity of 1274.4 RFU; RFU = relative fluorescence units.
Population structure as identified by spa typing, BURP analysis, mecA and agr PCR.
| Number of Isolates | Methicillin Resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 084 | 38 | t084 (10), t091 (19), t144, t360, t491, t2616, t4802, t7071, t11193, t12178, t18220 | MSSA | |
| 012 | 21 | t012 (9), t018 (2), t021, t046, t090, t122 (2), t363, t726, t840, t964, t1654 | MSSA | |
| 015 | 19 | t015, t050 (2), t069, t095, t102, t133, t230, t302, t550, t583, t728 (2), t1231, t1510, t2195, t4153, t5032, t18219 | MSSA | |
| 005/032 | 18 | t005 (3), | 9/18 MRSA | |
| 068/008 | 11 | t008 (5), | 1/11 MRSA | |
| 034/011 | 5 | 4/5 MRSA | ||
| 864 | 4 | t153, t166, t352, t864 | MSSA | |
| 065 | 3 | t040, t065, t6137 | MSSA | |
| NF1 #1 | 4 | t002 (3), t311 | MSSA | |
| NF #2 | 4 | t156 (2), t160 (2) | MSSA | |
| NF #3 | 3 | MRSA | ||
| NF #4 | 3 | t267 (2), t692 | MSSA | |
| NF #5 | 2 | t127, t177 | MSSA | |
| NF #6 | 2 | t364, t493 | MSSA | |
| singletons | 29 | t056 (2), t078, t092, t100, t131, t148 (2), t159, t189, t216, t280, t335, t351, t428, t845, t933, t1305, t1430, t2227, | 1/29 MRSA | mixed |
| excluded | 10 | t026 (4), t643, t693, t748, t1050, t1991, t3625 | MSSA | mixed |
1NF no founder, i.e., related spa types clustered without an identified founder spa type. In the column “spa types”, the number of isolates assigned to each spa type is given in brackets if a spa type was found in more than one isolate. In the column “agr type”, the number of isolates assigned to each agr type is given in brackets if different agr types were found within one spa-CC. MRSA spa types are printed in bold, livestock-associated (LA)-MRSA spa types are underlined.
Figure 2Population structure as analyzed by spa typing and BURP clustering. Clonally related spa types are grouped together in spa clonal complexes (spa-CCs). Eight spa-CCs comprising 119 isolates were identified. The founder of each complex, i.e., the spa type of clonal origin, is calculated by the BURP algorithm as the sum of evolutionary steps between spa types which is condensed into founder scores [20]. The spa type with the highest founder score is defined as the founder and colored in blue. Should two spa types reach the same score, both will be colored in blue. Yellow color indicates the subfounders, identified by the second highest founder score within one complex. The lines connect the founder to the descendant spa types of one spa-CC, whereby black lines represent a direct relation (one evolutionary step) and lighter shades represent a more distant relation (up to four steps). The size of each circle symbolizes the number of isolates in this study that belong to the respective spa type. The size of blank space between different spa-CCs was chosen arbitrarily and provides no information about clonal distance between them. 12 spa types, comprising 18 isolates, could be grouped into clusters but not complexes as no founder was identified. These are shown at the bottom of this figure. 29 spa types were defined as singletons without clonal relation to other spa types in this study, these are not depicted in this figure. 10 isolates were excluded from the analysis by default settings as their spa sequence was shorter than five repeats. For details on numbers of isolates per spa type and spa-CC, see Table 4 and Supplementary Table S2.
Impact of patient age on overall survival.
| 0–18 Years | 19–55 Years | 56–70 Years | >70 Years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall mortality in % | 7.7 | 15.7 | 26.5 | 32.3 |
| Median overall survival time in days (CI) | n.a. 1 | 422.0 (n.a.1) | 297.0 (0.0–618.4) | 75.0 (35.2–114.8) |
1n.a. no information available: median survival is not computed if too many cases are censored.
Figure 3Kaplan Meier survival estimates for the four age groups 0–18 years (n = 13, 1 death), 19–55 years (n = 51, 8 deaths), 56–70 years (n = 49, 13 deaths) and older than 70 years (n = 65, 21 deaths). The numbers of patients under observation per age group at each time point are given below the figure. Survival was worse in patients over 70 years compared to those aged 0–18 years (p = 0.041) and 19–55 years (p = 0.023). Data of three patients were missing.
Figure 4Overall mortality rates in percent per age group. Mortality rates increased with advancing age, whereby survival was worse in patients older than 70 years compared to patients aged 0–18 years (p = 0.041) and 19–55 years (p = 0.023). Data of three patients were missing.
Figure 5Kaplan Meier survival estimates distinguished by agr type: negative (n = 1, 0 deaths), agr type 1 (n = 109, 28 deaths), agr type 2 (n = 33, 7 deaths), agr type 3 (n = 31, 6 deaths) and agr type 4 (n = 3, 2 deaths). The numbers of patients under observation per agr type at each time point are given below the figure. Survival was worse in patients infected by isolates of agr type 4 compared to all other agr types (p ≤ 0.001) except for the agr negative isolate. Data of one patient were missing.
Impact of initial therapy on patient survival.
| Adequate Initial Therapy | Inadequate Initial Therapy | Log-Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall mortality in % | 18.7 | 34.2 | 0.041 |
| Median overall survival time in days (CI) | 139.0 (36.6–241.4) | 106.0 (20.2–191.8) | |
| 30-day mortality in % | 10.3 | 26.3 | 0.010 |
Figure 6Kaplan-Meier survival estimates distinguished by adequacy of initial therapy. The numbers of patients under observation per therapy group at each time point are given below the figure. Data of 33 patients were missing. (a) Overall survival of patients with adequate (n = 107, 20 deaths) or inadequate (n = 38, 13 deaths) initial therapy. (b) 30-day survival of patients with adequate (n = 107, 11 deaths) and inadequate (n = 38, 10 deaths) initial therapy. Survival was worse in patients with inadequate initial therapy (p = 0.041 for (a), p = 0.010 for (b)).
Impact of leukocyte counts on patient survival.
| Leukocytes Lowered | Leukocytes Normal | Leukocytes Elevated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall mortality in % | 45.0 | 17.3 | 26.0 |
| Median overall survival time in days (CI) | 67.0 (40.5–93.5) | 422.0 (49.5–794.5) | 106.0 (62.7–149.3) |
Figure 7Kaplan-Meier survival estimates distinguished by leukocyte count: lowered, i.e., <3.9 × 10³/µL (n = 20, 9 deaths); normal, i.e., 3.9–10.9 x10³/µL (n = 75, 13 deaths); and elevated, i.e., >10.9 × 10³/µL (n = 77, 20 deaths). The numbers of patients under observation per leukocyte group at each time point are given below the figure. Survival was worse in patients with elevated or lowered leukocyte counts compared to those with normal values (p = 0.029 and p = 0.003, respectively). Data of six patients were missing.
Figure 8(a) Numbers of patients who received inadequate initial therapy per age group in percent. Inadequate initial treatment was associated with advanced age, whereby patients in the age groups 56–70 years and older than 70 years were significantly more likely to receive inadequate initial therapy than patients aged 0–18 years (p = 0.035 and p = 0.022, respectively; missing data of 33 patients). (b) Numbers of patients who initially received second-line therapy or were infected by MRSA in percent. Patients of the age group 0–18 years were likelier to receive second-line antibiotics as initial therapy compared to patients of the age groups 19–55 years (p = 0.002), 56–70 years (p = 0.005) and older than 70 years (p = 0.001, missing data of 33 patients), whereby no patient aged 0–18 years was infected by MRSA.