| Literature DB >> 33800595 |
Matthew Borok1, Nathalie Didier1,2, Francesca Gattazzo1,2, Teoman Ozturk1,2, Aurelien Corneau3, Helene Rouard1,2, Frederic Relaix1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Background: Skeletal muscle is one of the only mammalian tissues capable of rapid and efficient regeneration after trauma or in pathological conditions. Skeletal muscle regeneration is driven by the muscle satellite cells, the stem cell population in interaction with their niche. Upon injury, muscle fibers undergo necrosis and muscle stem cells activate, proliferate and fuse to form new myofibers. In addition to myogenic cell populations, interaction with other cell types such as inflammatory cells, mesenchymal (fibroadipogenic progenitors-FAPs, pericytes) and vascular (endothelial) lineages are important for efficient muscle repair. While the role of the distinct populations involved in skeletal muscle regeneration is well characterized, the quantitative changes in the muscle stem cell and niche during the regeneration process remain poorly characterized.Entities:
Keywords: CyTOF; muscle niche; muscle stem cells; regeneration; satellite cells; skeletal muscle
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800595 PMCID: PMC8066646 DOI: 10.3390/cells10040744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
List of Antibodies Used in CyTOF Experiments.
| Antigen | Localization | Metal Isotope | Company | Experiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD45 | Surface | 89Y | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| LY6G | Surface | 141Pr | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| CASP3 | Intracellular | 142Pr | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| P57 | Intracellular | 143Nd | Santa Cruz | Native and regenerating |
| PDGFRB | Surface | 144Nd | Cell Signaling | Native and regenerating |
| F4/80 | Surface | 146Nd | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| SMA | Intracellular | 147Sm | Sigma | Native and regenerating |
| CD34 | Surface | 148Nd | BD Biosciences | Regenerating |
| PDGFRA | Surface | 148Nd | Fluidigm | Native |
| p4EBP1 | Intracellular | 149Sm | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| LY-6C | Surface | 150Nd | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| NESTIN | Intracellular | 151Eu | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| pAKT | Intracellular | 152Sm | Fluidigm | Regenerating |
| CD3E | Surface | 152Sm | Fluidigm | Native |
| CYCLINB1 | Intracellular | 153Eu | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| SYNDECAN4 | Surface | 154Sm | Santa Cruz | Regenerating |
| ITGA7 | Surface | 154Sm | R&D Systems | Native |
| TCF4 | Surface | 155Gd | Fisher Sci | Native and regenerating |
| pSMAD1/5 | Intracellular | 156Gd | Cell Signaling | Native and regenerating |
| pSTAT3 | Intracellular | 158Gd | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| P21 | Intracellular | 159Tb | Fluidigm | Regenerating |
| JAG1 | Surface | 159Tb | Santa Cruz | Native |
| PDGFRA | Surface | 160Gd | Fluidigm | Regenerating |
| PAX3/7 | Intracellular | 161Dy | Santa Cruz | Native and regenerating |
| KI67 | Intracellular | 162Dy | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| NG2 | Surface | 163Dy | Cell Signaling | Native and regenerating |
| LY-6A_E | Surface | 164Dy | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| CD31 | Surface | 165Ho | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| pRB | Intracellular | 166Er | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| P27 | Intracellular | 167Er | Santa Cruz | Native and regenerating |
| MCADHERIN | Surface | 168Er | Fisher Sci | Regenerating |
| CD8A | Surface | 168Er | Fluidigm | Native |
| GFP | Intracellular | 169Tm | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| MYOGENIN | Intracellular | 170Er | Santa Cruz | Native and regenerating |
| pERK1/2 | Intracellular | 171Yb | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
| CD11B | Surface | 172Yb | Fluidigm | Regenerating |
| pS6 | Intracellular | 172Yb | Fluidigm | Native |
| VCAM | Surface | 173Yb | BD Biosciences | Native and regenerating |
| MYF5 | Intracellular | 174Yb | Santa Cruz | Regenerating |
| NRF2 | Intracellular | 174Yb | Cell Signaling | Native |
| pHH3 | Intracellular | 175Lu | Fluidigm | Native and regenerating |
Figure 1Early activation of skeletal muscle modifies the niche proteome. (A) Visualization of t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (viSNE) plot of single cell preparations of whole-body musculature with immediate fixation (T0) or two hours of digestion (T3). Manual gates were applied for the coloration of different populations. Ungated: cells not captured by the following manual gates, Panelneg: cells not captured by manual gating of standard skeletal muscle cell markers, likely containing glial and tenogenic cells (Giordani et al. 2019), SMMC: smooth muscle mesenchymal cells (ITGA7+ VCAM−) Sat: MuSC (Pax7− progenitors (PDGFRα+ SCA1+). Quantification by manual gating at right. n = 2 (B) viSNE analysis of endothelial cells with pSTAT3 levels indicated and quantification by manual gating at right. (C) viSNE analysis of FAPs with pS6 levels indicated and quantification by manual gating at right. (D) viSNE analysis of GFP+ cells with PAX3/7 levels indicated and quantification by manual gating at right. Low expression-blue, high expression-red.
Figure 2The cellular makeup of skeletal muscle is reshuffled following injury. (A) viSNE plot of regenerating TA muscle cell types before and following BaCl2 injury. Panelneg: cells not captured by manual gating of standard skeletal muscle cell markers, Myo: myogenic cells (Pax7-nGFP+), Endo: endothelial cells (CD31+), Peri: pericytes (PDGFRβ+ SCA1−), M1: type 1 macrophages (F4/80+ LY6C+), M2: type 2 macrophages (F4/80+ LY6C−), FAP: fibro-adipogenic progenitors (PDGFRα+ SCA1+), Gran: granulocytes (LY6G+). n = 3 for D0, D2, D5, n = 2 for D7. (B) Quantitation of immune cell proportion in resting and regenerating muscle. (C) Makeup of the immune compartment at different time points. (D) Makeup of the non-immune compartment at different time points.
Figure 3Cyclic activation of muscle stem cells during injury. viSNE analysis of GFP+ cells at each time point with several markers shown. Low expression-blue, high expression red.
Figure 4Quantitative FACS analysis of mononucleated cells from single TAs. Graphs showing the number of PAX7+ cells/TA (A), the % of quiescent PAX7+ cells (defined as MYOG−MYOD−Ki67−PAX7+ cells) (B), the % of KI67+PAX7+ cells (C), the number of MYOD+ cells/TA (D) and MYOG+ cells/TA (E), and the proportions of myogenic cells expressing PAX7 and MYOD (F). Data are represented as the mean ±sem of minimum 4 isolated TAs. One-way ANOVA or Two-way ANOVA (F) with ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 5Cellular dynamics during muscle regeneration. (Left) Proportions of different cell populations before and following injury. (Right) Expression of key transcription factors in the myogenic lineage.