Literature DB >> 3379987

A randomized trial of quality assurance in nursing homes.

E A Mohide1, P X Tugwell, P A Caulfield, L W Chambers, C W Dunnett, S Baptiste, J R Bayne, C Patterson, K V Rudnick, M Pill.   

Abstract

Sixty nursing homes were randomly allocated to receive or not to receive a quality assurance intervention. The experimental intervention included the use of predeveloped quality assurance packages, the services of a quality assurance consultant, and the process of working through the quality assurance cycle with one of two principal indicator conditions. Two prevalent health problems, hazardous mobility and constipation, were selected as the principal indicator conditions. To detect co-intervention, one of two hidden secondary indicator conditions (potential skin breakdown and urinary incontinence) was assessed in each facility. In the control nursing homes, both the principal and secondary indicator conditions were hidden from staff. The care for 1,525 residents was examined before and after the intervention using a retrospective record review initiated for the study purposes. Improvement in management of the principal conditions, hazardous mobility and constipation, was greater in the experimental group (P less than 0.03 and P less than 0.005, respectively). Neither group changed its management of the hidden conditions. Behavior change was achieved using quality assurance-linked interventions. Further research should focus on refining quality assurance interventions that provide staff education and motivational strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3379987     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198806000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  9 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of quality systems in nursing homes: a review.

Authors:  C Wagner; G van der Wal; P P Groenewegen; D H de Bakker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

2.  Translating evidence-based falls prevention into clinical practice in nursing facilities: Results and lessons from a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Anna Schenck; Joel Gorospe; Jill McArdle; Lee Dobson; Cindy Deporter; Eleanor McConnell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Impact of public reporting on unreported quality of care.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; R Tamara Konetzka; Gregory B Kruse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Does hospital performance on process measures directly measure high quality care or is it a marker of unmeasured care?

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Eric T Bradlow; David A Asch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Randomized multilevel intervention to improve outcomes of residents in nursing homes in need of improvement.

Authors:  Marilyn J Rantz; Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher; Lanis Hicks; David Mehr; Marcia Flesner; Gregory F Petroski; Richard W Madsen; Jill Scott-Cawiezell
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  The challenge of urinary incontinence in the elderly.

Authors:  G Worrall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Can we afford not to evaluate services for elderly persons with dementia?

Authors:  G Worrall; L W Chambers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  [Not Available].

Authors:  G Worrall; L W Chambers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in care homes.

Authors:  Adam L Gordon; Phillipa A Logan; Rob G Jones; Calum Forrester-Paton; Jonathan P Mamo; John R F Gladman
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.