| Literature DB >> 33799358 |
Venkateswaran Rajagopalan1, Erik P Pioro2,3.
Abstract
A pathological hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is corticospinal tract (CST) degeneration resulting in upper motor neuron (UMN) dysfunction. No quantitative test is available to easily assess UMN pathways. Brain neuroimaging in ALS promises to potentially change this through identifying biomarkers of UMN dysfunction that may accelerate diagnosis and track disease progression. Fractal dimension (FD) has successfully been used to quantify brain grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) shape complexity in various neurological disorders. Therefore, we investigated CST and whole brain GM and WM morphometric changes using FD analyses in ALS patients with different phenotypes. We hypothesized that FD would detect differences between ALS patients and neurologic controls and even between the ALS subgroups. Neuroimaging was performed in neurologic controls (n = 14), and ALS patients (n = 75). ALS patients were assigned into four groups based on their clinical or radiographic phenotypes. FD values were estimated for brain WM and GM structures. Patients with ALS and frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD) showed significantly higher CST FD values and lower primary motor and sensory cortex GM FD values compared to other ALS groups. No other group of ALS patients revealed significant FD value changes when compared to neurologic controls or with other ALS patient groups. These findings support a more severe disease process in ALS-FTD patients compared to other ALS patient groups. FD value measures may be a sensitive index to evaluate GM and WM (including CST) degeneration in ALS patients.Entities:
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; corticospinal tract; fractal dimension; grey matter; white matter
Year: 2021 PMID: 33799358 PMCID: PMC8001972 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11030371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Participant characteristics.
| ALS-Cl | ALS-CST+ | ALS-CST− | ALS-FTD | Controls | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||||
| Age (year) | 57.5 ± 12.2 | 51.7 ± 11.6 | 59.4 ± 10.5 | 67.4 ±10.2 | 51.7 ± 15.7 | |
|
| 19 | 17 | 25 | 14 | 14 | |
| Gender | 11 male, 8 female | 12 male, 5 female | 15 male, 10 female | 3 male, 11 female | 9 male, 5 female | |
| ALSFRS-R | 37.0 ± 9.3 | 33 ± 7.8 | 35.9 ± 7.0 | 29 ± 6.9 | ||
| Symptom duration (months) | 27.2 ± 26.5 | 15.4 ± 8.1 | 61.4 ± 61.5 | 38.4 ± 20.5 | ||
| Disease progression rate | −0.7 ± 0.8 | −1.5 ± 1.8 | −0.4 ± 0.3 | −0.6 ± 0.30 | ||
| El Escorial Score | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 1.3 |
Disease progression rate is calculated as given in equation below:.
Figure 1Compared to neurologic controls, FD values (±SEM) of PSC-CST are significantly lower in ALS-Cl and ALS-CST− patients but higher in ALS-FTD patients in right (a) and left (b) hemispheres. Significant differences are not detected between ALS-CST+ patients and neurologic controls but FD values are significantly lower in the left PSC-CST of ALS-Cl compared to ALS-CST+ patients, as indicated by + at p < 0.05. Significance between ALS-FTD and controls and other ALS subgroups at p < 0.05 is indicated by *.
Figure 2Compared to neurologic controls, FD values (±SEM) of PSC GM are significantly higher in ALS-CL, ALS-CST+, and ALS-CST− patients but lower in ALS-FTD patients of right (a) and left (b) hemispheres. * indicates significance between groups at p < 0.05.