| Literature DB >> 33799328 |
Nguyen Thi Thanh Hai1, Nguyen Duc Cuong1,2, Nguyen Tran Quyen3, Nguyen Quoc Hien4, Tran Thi Dieu Hien3, Nguyen Thi Thanh Phung3, Dao Khac Toan1,5, Nguyen Thi Thu Huong1, Dang Van Phu4, Tran Thai Hoa1.
Abstract
Cu nanoparticles are a potential material for creating novel alternative antimicrobial products due to their unique antibacterial/antifungal properties, stability, dispersion, low cost and abundance as well as being economical and ecofriendly. In this work, carboxymethyl cellulose coated core/shell SiO2@Cu nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by a simple and effective chemical reduction process. The initial SiO2 NPs, which were prepared from rice husk ash, were coated by a copper ultrathin film using hydrazine and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as reducing agent and stable agent, respectively. The core/shell SiO2@Cu nanoparticles with an average size of ~19 nm were surrounded by CMC. The results indicated that the SiO2@Cu@CMC suspension was a homogenous morphology with a spherical shape, regular dispersion and good stability. Furthermore, the multicomponent SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs showed good antifungal activity against Phytophthora capsici (P. capsici). The novel Cu NPs-based multicomponent suspension is a key compound in the development of new fungicides for the control of the Phytophthora disease.Entities:
Keywords: Phytophthora capsici; antimicrobial properties; carboxymethyl cellulose; fungicide; multicomponent SiO2@Cu@CMC nanoparticles; plant defense
Year: 2021 PMID: 33799328 PMCID: PMC8001355 DOI: 10.3390/polym13060888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1UV-vis absorption spectra of the as-prepared colloidal solutions as a function of time (a) and the scheme of SiO2@Cu@CMC nanoparticles (NPs) (b).
Figure 2XRD patterns of the powder samples. XRD pattern of SiO2NPs (a) and XRD pattern of SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs (b).
Figure 3The TEM image of SiO2 NPs (a) and the TEM image of SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs (b).
Figure 4The high magnification TEM of the SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs (a) and HRTEM image of the SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs (b).
Figure 5Infrared spectra of (a) SiO2 NPs, (b) CMC, (c) SiO2@Cu NPs and (d) SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs.
Figure 6Typical EDX spectrum of SiO2@Cu@CMC NPs (a). EDX elemental mapping of Si (b), O (c), Cu (d) and C (e).
P. capsici inhibition by SiO2@Cu@CMC at different concentrations.
| SiO2@Cu@CMC Concentration (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| 0 | 0.00 g | 0.00 h | 0.00 h |
| 25 | 49.11 b | 54.78 c | 39.47 c |
| 50 | 84.07 a | 80.05 b | 73.37 b |
| 75 | 84.07 a | 92.34 a | 93.30 a |
| 100 | 84.07 a | 92.34 a | 93.30 a |
| 125 | 84.07 a | 92.34 a | 93.30 a |
| P0.05 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
In the same column, different letters (e.g., a, b, c) show significant differences between treatments at P0.05.
Figure 7Mycelial growth of P. capsici after 72 h of incubation on potato dextrose agar (PDA) added by different concentrations of SiO2@Cu (a) 0 ppm, (b) 25 ppm, (c) 50 ppm, (d) 75 ppm, (e) 100 ppm, (f) 125 ppm.