Literature DB >> 33798190

Computation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) from network models of point neurons.

Pablo Martínez-Cañada1,2,3, Torbjørn V Ness4, Gaute T Einevoll4,5, Tommaso Fellin1,3, Stefano Panzeri1,2.   

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a major tool for non-invasively studying brain function and dysfunction. Comparing experimentally recorded EEGs with neural network models is important to better interpret EEGs in terms of neural mechanisms. Most current neural network models use networks of simple point neurons. They capture important properties of cortical dynamics, and are numerically or analytically tractable. However, point neurons cannot generate an EEG, as EEG generation requires spatially separated transmembrane currents. Here, we explored how to compute an accurate approximation of a rodent's EEG with quantities defined in point-neuron network models. We constructed different approximations (or proxies) of the EEG signal that can be computed from networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) point neurons, such as firing rates, membrane potentials, and combinations of synaptic currents. We then evaluated how well each proxy reconstructed a ground-truth EEG obtained when the synaptic currents of the LIF model network were fed into a three-dimensional network model of multicompartmental neurons with realistic morphologies. Proxies based on linear combinations of AMPA and GABA currents performed better than proxies based on firing rates or membrane potentials. A new class of proxies, based on an optimized linear combination of time-shifted AMPA and GABA currents, provided the most accurate estimate of the EEG over a wide range of network states. The new linear proxies explained 85-95% of the variance of the ground-truth EEG for a wide range of network configurations including different cell morphologies, distributions of presynaptic inputs, positions of the recording electrode, and spatial extensions of the network. Non-linear EEG proxies using a convolutional neural network (CNN) on synaptic currents increased proxy performance by a further 2-8%. Our proxies can be used to easily calculate a biologically realistic EEG signal directly from point-neuron simulations thus facilitating a quantitative comparison between computational models and experimental EEG recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33798190      PMCID: PMC8046357          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.779


  78 in total

Review 1.  Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Age-Related Changes in 1/f Neural Electrophysiological Noise.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Mark A Kramer; John Case; Kyle Q Lepage; Zechari R Tempesta; Robert T Knight; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Scale-free brain activity: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Biyu J He
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials.

Authors:  Richard Gao; Erik J Peterson; Bradley Voytek
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Excitation-inhibition balance as a framework for investigating mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Vikaas S Sohal; John L R Rubenstein
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 15.992

6.  Reconstruction and Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry.

Authors:  Henry Markram; Eilif Muller; Srikanth Ramaswamy; Michael W Reimann; Marwan Abdellah; Carlos Aguado Sanchez; Anastasia Ailamaki; Lidia Alonso-Nanclares; Nicolas Antille; Selim Arsever; Guy Antoine Atenekeng Kahou; Thomas K Berger; Ahmet Bilgili; Nenad Buncic; Athanassia Chalimourda; Giuseppe Chindemi; Jean-Denis Courcol; Fabien Delalondre; Vincent Delattre; Shaul Druckmann; Raphael Dumusc; James Dynes; Stefan Eilemann; Eyal Gal; Michael Emiel Gevaert; Jean-Pierre Ghobril; Albert Gidon; Joe W Graham; Anirudh Gupta; Valentin Haenel; Etay Hay; Thomas Heinis; Juan B Hernando; Michael Hines; Lida Kanari; Daniel Keller; John Kenyon; Georges Khazen; Yihwa Kim; James G King; Zoltan Kisvarday; Pramod Kumbhar; Sébastien Lasserre; Jean-Vincent Le Bé; Bruno R C Magalhães; Angel Merchán-Pérez; Julie Meystre; Benjamin Roy Morrice; Jeffrey Muller; Alberto Muñoz-Céspedes; Shruti Muralidhar; Keerthan Muthurasa; Daniel Nachbaur; Taylor H Newton; Max Nolte; Aleksandr Ovcharenko; Juan Palacios; Luis Pastor; Rodrigo Perin; Rajnish Ranjan; Imad Riachi; José-Rodrigo Rodríguez; Juan Luis Riquelme; Christian Rössert; Konstantinos Sfyrakis; Ying Shi; Julian C Shillcock; Gilad Silberberg; Ricardo Silva; Farhan Tauheed; Martin Telefont; Maria Toledo-Rodriguez; Thomas Tränkler; Werner Van Geit; Jafet Villafranca Díaz; Richard Walker; Yun Wang; Stefano M Zaninetta; Javier DeFelipe; Sean L Hill; Idan Segev; Felix Schürmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The Spectrum of Asynchronous Dynamics in Spiking Networks as a Model for the Diversity of Non-rhythmic Waking States in the Neocortex.

Authors:  Yann Zerlaut; Stefano Zucca; Stefano Panzeri; Tommaso Fellin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Alterations in Schizophrenia-Associated Genes Can Lead to Increased Power in Delta Oscillations.

Authors:  Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen; Florian Krull; Francesco Bettella; Espen Hagen; Solveig Næss; Torbjørn V Ness; Torgeir Moberget; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen; Christoph Metzner; Anna Devor; Andrew G Edwards; Marianne Fyhn; Srdjan Djurovic; Anders M Dale; Ole A Andreassen; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The stimulus-evoked population response in visual cortex of awake monkey is a propagating wave.

Authors:  Lyle Muller; Alexandre Reynaud; Frédéric Chavane; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Cortical layers, rhythms and BOLD signals.

Authors:  René Scheeringa; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Brain signal predictions from multi-scale networks using a linearized framework.

Authors:  Espen Hagen; Steinn H Magnusson; Torbjørn V Ness; Geir Halnes; Pooja N Babu; Charl Linssen; Abigail Morrison; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.779

2.  Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.

Authors:  Torbjørn V Ness; Geir Halnes; Solveig Næss; Klas H Pettersen; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  Active Dendrites and Local Field Potentials: Biophysical Mechanisms and Computational Explorations.

Authors:  Manisha Sinha; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Spatiotemporal Patterns of Adaptation-Induced Slow Oscillations in a Whole-Brain Model of Slow-Wave Sleep.

Authors:  Caglar Cakan; Cristiana Dimulescu; Liliia Khakimova; Daniela Obst; Agnes Flöel; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Methods for inferring neural circuit interactions and neuromodulation from local field potential and electroencephalogram measures.

Authors:  Pablo Martínez-Cañada; Shahryar Noei; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2021-12-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.