Literature DB >> 33797713

Two efficient CRISPR/Cas9 systems for gene editing in soybean.

Jéssica Carrijo1,2, Eudald Illa-Berenguer3, Peter LaFayette3,4, Nathalia Torres2, Francisco J L Aragão1,2, Wayne Parrott3,4, Giovanni R Vianna5,6.   

Abstract

Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 has been highlighted as a powerful tool for crop improvement. Nevertheless, its efficiency can be improved, especially for crops with a complex genome, such as soybean. In this work, using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology we evaluated two CRISPR systems, a one-component vs. a two-component strategy. In a simplified system, the single transcriptional unit (STU), SpCas9 and sgRNA are driven by only one promoter, and in the conventional system, the two-component transcriptional unit (TCTU), SpCas9, is under the control of a pol II promoter and the sgRNAs are under the control of a pol III promoter. A multiplex system with three targets was designed targeting two different genes, GmIPK1 and GmIPK2, coding for enzymes from the phytic acid synthesis pathway. Both systems were tested using the hairy root soybean methodology. Results showed gene-specific edition. For the GmIPK1 gene, edition was observed in both configurations, with a deletion of 1 to 749 base pairs; however, the TCTU showed higher indel frequencies. For GmIPK2 major exclusions were observed in both systems, but the editing efficiency was low for STU. Both systems (STU or TCTU) have been shown to be capable of promoting effective gene editing in soybean. The TCTU configuration proved to be preferable, since it was more efficient. The STU system was less efficient, but the size of the CRISPR/Cas cassette was smaller.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genome editing; Low phytic acid; Single transcriptional unit; Two-component transcriptional unit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33797713     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-021-00246-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  39 in total

Review 1.  Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for Crop Improvement in Maize and Soybean.

Authors:  Doane Chilcoat; Zhan-Bin Liu; Jeffry Sander
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.622

2.  A Multipurpose Toolkit to Enable Advanced Genome Engineering in Plants.

Authors:  Tomáš Čermák; Shaun J Curtin; Javier Gil-Humanes; Radim Čegan; Thomas J Y Kono; Eva Konečná; Joseph J Belanto; Colby G Starker; Jade W Mathre; Rebecca L Greenstein; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants.

Authors:  W Chiu; Y Niwa; W Zeng; T Hirano; H Kobayashi; J Sheen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  New cloning vehicles for transformation of higher plants.

Authors:  G An; B D Watson; S Stachel; M P Gordon; E W Nester
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean.

Authors:  Aili Bao; Haifeng Chen; Limiao Chen; Shuilian Chen; Qingnan Hao; Wei Guo; Dezhen Qiu; Zhihui Shan; Zhonglu Yang; Songli Yuan; Chanjuan Zhang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Baohui Liu; Fanjiang Kong; Xia Li; Xinan Zhou; Lam-Son Phan Tran; Dong Cao
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmLHY genes alters plant height and internode length in soybean.

Authors:  Qun Cheng; Lidong Dong; Tong Su; Tingyu Li; Zhuoran Gan; Haiyang Nan; Sijia Lu; Chao Fang; Lingping Kong; Haiyang Li; Zhihong Hou; Kun Kou; Yang Tang; Xiaoya Lin; Xiaohui Zhao; Liyu Chen; Baohui Liu; Fanjiang Kong
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Isolation of two highly active soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) promoters and their characterization using a new automated image collection and analysis system.

Authors:  Joseph M Chiera; Robert A Bouchard; Summer L Dorsey; EuiHo Park; Marco T Buenrostro-Nava; Peter P Ling; John J Finer
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Diversity of CRISPR-Cas immune systems and molecular machines.

Authors:  Rodolphe Barrangou
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Optimizing sgRNA structure to improve CRISPR-Cas9 knockout efficiency.

Authors:  Ying Dang; Gengxiang Jia; Jennie Choi; Hongming Ma; Edgar Anaya; Chunting Ye; Premlata Shankar; Haoquan Wu
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 10.  The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond.

Authors:  Mazhar Adli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Progress in Soybean Genetic Transformation Over the Last Decade.

Authors:  Hu Xu; Yong Guo; Lijuan Qiu; Yidong Ran
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9 in Planta Hairy Root Transformation: A Powerful Platform for Functional Analysis of Root Traits in Soybean.

Authors:  Mohsen Niazian; François Belzile; Davoud Torkamaneh
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12

3.  An efficient and specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system targeting soybean phytoene desaturase genes.

Authors:  Qing Shi Mimmie Lu; Lining Tian
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.563

4.  Ribozyme-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium) hairy roots using a RNA polymerase II-dependent promoter.

Authors:  Jia-Wen Li; Tuo Zeng; Zhi-Zhuo Xu; Jin-Jin Li; Hao Hu; Qin Yu; Li Zhou; Ri-Ru Zheng; Jing Luo; Cai-Yun Wang
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.993

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.