Literature DB >> 33797602

The effect of gracilis tendon harvesting in addition to semitendinosus tendon harvesting on knee extensor and flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Takuya Sengoku1,2, Junsuke Nakase3, Kazuki Asai2, Rikuto Yoshimizu2, Goro Sakurai1, Shinya Yoshida1, Tetsutaro Yahata2,4, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons may involve harvesting of the gracilis tendon in addition to the semitendinosus tendon (ST) depending on the size of the ST graft. However, the effect of gracilis harvesting in addition to ST harvesting on muscle strength, such as the hamstring-to-quadriceps (HQ) ratio, remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of gracilis harvesting on subsequent knee muscle strength.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into the following two groups depending on the tendon graft used for ACL reconstruction: the ST group (41 patients) and the semitendinosus tendon/gracilis tendon (STG) group (41 patients). The isokinetic peak torque of the knee extensor and flexor was measured using a BIODEX dynamometer at a velocity of 60°/s and 180°/s, respectively, 3 and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. The groups were compared in terms of the limb symmetry index (LSI) and HQ ratio.
RESULTS: The significant difference in the knee flexor of the LSI at 6 months after ACL reconstruction was as follows: ST group, 120.3 ± 28.3 vs STG group, 105.6 ± 19.0 (p < 0.01) at 60°/s and ST group, 122.9 ± 35.2 vs STG group, 106.2 ± 24.6 (p = 0.02) at 180°/s. There were significant differences in the HQ ratio at 180°/s as follows: ST group, 0.67 ± 0.15 vs STG group, 0.60 ± 0.13 (p < 0.01) at 3 months and ST group, 0.67 ± 0.13 vs STG group, and 0.59 ± 0.12 (p < 0.01) at 6 months after ACL reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Gracilis tendon harvesting may contribute to a decrease in knee flexor strength and HQ ratio with fast contraction. Thus, the need for gracilis tendon harvesting in ACL reconstruction should be carefully considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Fast contraction; Gracilis tendon harvesting; HQ ratio; Knee flexor strength

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33797602     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03877-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  2 in total

Review 1.  Does Gracilis Preservation Matter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Avijit Sharma; David C Flanigan; Kyle Randall; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Rationale and Clinical Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Among Female Athletes.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.860

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Correlation of Isokinetic Testing and ACL Failure With the Short Graft Tape Suspension Technique at Six Months.

Authors:  Mathieu Severyns; Stéphane Plawecki; Guillaume-Anthony Odri; Tanguy Vendeuvre; Frédéric Depiesse; Jean-Francois Flez; Louis-Antoine Liguori
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-06

2.  Isometric Knee Muscle Strength and Patient-Reported Measures Five Years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Autograft Hamstring Tendon Harvesting.

Authors:  Ignacio Manchado; Luci M Motta; Gustavo Blanco; Jesús González; Gerardo L Garcés
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.