Literature DB >> 33796983

Resource Use Among Diabetes Patients Who Mainly Visit Primary Care Physicians Versus Medical Specialists: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

David J Nyweide1, Andrea M Austin2, Julie P W Bynum3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon for medical specialists to predominantly care for patients with certain chronic conditions rather than primary care physicians (PCPs), yet the resource implications from such patterns of care are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE: To assess resource use of diabetes patients who predominantly visit a PCP versus a medical specialist.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of diabetes patients aging into the traditional Medicare program. Patients were attributed to a PCP or medical specialist annually based on a preponderance of ambulatory care visits and categorized according to whether attribution changed year to year. Propensity score weighting was used to balance baseline demographic characteristics, diabetes complications, and underlying health conditions between patients attributed to PCPs and to medical specialists. Spending and utilization were measured up to 3 patient-years.
SUBJECTS: A total of 141,558 patient-years. MAIN MEASURES: Total visits, unique physicians, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, procedures, imaging, and tests. KEY
RESULTS: Each year, roughly 70% of patients maintained attribution to a PCP and 15% to a medical specialist relative to the previous year. After propensity weighting, patients continuously attributed to a PCP versus medical specialist from 1 year to the next had lower average total payer payments ($10,326 [SD $57,386] versus $14,971 [SD $74,112], P<0.0001) and lower total patient out-of-pocket payments ($1,707 [SD $6,020] versus $2,443 [SD $7,984], P<0.0001). Rates of hospitalization, emergency department visits, procedures, imaging, and tests were lower among patients attributed to PCPs as well.
CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with diabetes who receive more of their ambulatory care from a PCP instead of a medical specialist show evidence of lower resource use.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; diabetes; health care costs; primary care; propensity scores

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33796983      PMCID: PMC8811114          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06710-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US.

Authors:  E van Doorslaer; A Wagstaff; H van der Burg; T Christiansen; D De Graeve; I Duchesne; U G Gerdtham; M Gerfin; J Geurts; L Gross; U Häkkinen; J John; J Klavus; R E Leu; B Nolan; O O'Donnell; C Propper; F Puffer; M Schellhorn; G Sundberg; O Winkelhake
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Specialty differences in the care of older patients with diabetes.

Authors:  M H Chin; J X Zhang; K Merrell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Health care system chaos should spur innovation: summary of a report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Eric B Larson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Peter S Hussey; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Leiyu Shi; James Macinko
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Can Claims Data Algorithms Identify the Physician of Record?

Authors:  Eva H DuGoff; Emily Walden; Katie Ronk; Mari Palta; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. Results from the medical outcomes study.

Authors:  S Greenfield; W Rogers; M Mangotich; M F Carney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the medical outcomes study.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson; M Zubkoff; W Manning; W Rogers; R L Kravitz; A Keller; A R Tarlov; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients?.

Authors:  Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Klaus W Lemke; Terence Bernhardt; Steven S Foldes; Christopher B Forrest; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.