Literature DB >> 33796828

Sonographic Evaluation of Incidental Synchronous Masses in Patients with Breast Cancer: Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Workup.

Sara Rehman1, Imran Khalid Niazi1, Muhammad Atif Naveed1, Ainy Javaid1, Bushra Rehman2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast ultrasonography in classifying incidental satellite masses as benign or malignant in patients with breast cancer and to assess its effect on their surgical management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy was performed in 288 satellite masses of 225 patients with breast cancer. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the sonograms of these masses and classified them as benign or malignant and compared this feature with the results of the histopathological examination. The location of the satellite mass and type of surgery were also documented.
RESULTS: Of the 288 satellite masses, 139 were located in the same quadrant, 95 in different quadrants, while 54 were in the contralateral breast. Of the 123 sonographically benign masses, 106 showed benign pathological outcome, and from 165 sonographically malignant masses, 127 were found malignant on histopathology/cytology. McNemar's chi-square was 7.27 (p-value=0.007), showing statistically significant association between sonographic features and pathological outcome of satellite masses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 88.2%, 73.6%, 77%, 86.1%, and 80.9% respectively. Based on these findings, 61 patients underwent lumpectomy limited to a single tumor, 52 underwent extended resection, 78 underwent mastectomy, four underwent lumpectomy for the contralateral breast, and bilateral mastectomies were performed in another four patients. Surgery was not performed in 26 patients.
CONCLUSION: Although ultrasound is an effective tool for the detection and characterization of incidental satellite masses in patients with breast cancer, biopsy is imperative to ascertain the pathological diagnosis and, therefore, select the most appropriate surgical plan. ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; multicentric; multifocal; satellite; ultrasonography

Year:  2020        PMID: 33796828      PMCID: PMC8006782          DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.2020.5858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  21 in total

Review 1.  Multiple synchronous (multifocal and multicentric) breast cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  Sofiane Bendifallah; Gabrielle Werkoff; Constance Borie-Moutafoff; Martine Antoine; Jocelyne Chopier; Joseph Gligorov; Serge Uzan; Charles Coutant; Roman Rouzier
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.279

2.  Application of the breast imaging reporting and data system final assessment system in sonography of palpable breast lesions and reconsideration of the modified triple test.

Authors:  Jin Young Kwak; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hai-Lin Park; Ji-Young Kim; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Treatment of early breast cancer: a report after ten years of a clinical trial.

Authors:  H Atkins; J L Hayward; D J Klugman; A B Wayte
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-05-20

4.  Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.

Authors:  Fusun Taskin; Kutsi Koseoglu; Serdar Ozbas; Muhan Erkus; Can Karaman
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Multicentric mammary carcinoma: evidence of monoclonal proliferation.

Authors:  Lavinia P Middleton; George Vlastos; Nadeem Q Mirza; S Eva; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter?

Authors:  Nathan J Coombs; John Boyages
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Breast cancer onset in twins and women with bilateral disease.

Authors:  Mikael Hartman; Per Hall; Gustaf Edgren; Marie Reilly; Linda Lindstrom; Paul Lichtenstein; Jaakko Kaprio; Axel Skytthe; Julian Peto; Kamila Czene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; R Margolese; R Poisson; Y Pilch; C Redmond; E Fisher; N Wolmark; M Deutsch; E Montague
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.