| Literature DB >> 33796538 |
Depei Li1,2, Wanming Hu2,3, Xiaoping Lin2,4, Ji Zhang1,2, Zhenqiang He1,2, Sheng Zhong1,2, Xia Wen1,2, Peiyu Zhang1,2, Xiaobing Jiang1,2, Hao Duan1,2, Chengcheng Guo1,2, Jian Wang1,2, Jing Zeng2,3, Zhongping Chen1,2, Yonggao Mou1,2, Ke Sai1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proteins containing the caspase recruitment domain (CARD) play critical roles in cell apoptosis and immunity. However, the impact of CARD genes in tumor immune cell infiltration, responsiveness to checkpoint immunotherapy, and clinical outcomes of gliomas remains unclear. Here, we explore using CARD genes to depict the immune microenvironment and predict the responsiveness of gliomas to anti-PD-1 therapy.Entities:
Keywords: CARD; IDH; checkpoint immunotherapy; gliomas; tumor immune microenvironment
Year: 2021 PMID: 33796538 PMCID: PMC8009185 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.653240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1A panel of six-CARD genes associates with T lymphocyte infiltration in TCGA IDH wild-type gliomas. (A) Correlation between CARD gene expression and T-cell inflamed ssGSEA score. Top depicts Spearman R values. Non-significant correlations are crossed out. Scatter plots show fitted coefficient R2 values. (B,C) Consensus clustering matrix and heatmap with the six-CARD genes identified two clusters (CL1 and CL2). Histological and molecular subtypes were annotated for each patient. (D) PCA of two clusters. (E) Comparisons of immune score (from ESTIMATE), lymphocyte infiltration and T cell inflamed scores (from ssGSEA), and CYT and MHC scores (from mean gene expressions) between two clusters. P values: ***, <0.001.
FIGURE 2A panel of six-CARD genes associates with activation of immune pathway. (A) Top upregulated genes in CL1 versus CL2 (log2 fold change >2 and FDR < 0.01). Genes were sorted by the fold change and annotated using Immport database. (B) Overview of gene sets enriched in CL1 versus CL2 [normalized enrichment score (NES) >2 and FDR < 0.01]. (C) Differences in canonical gene sets between CL1 and CL2.
FIGURE 3Development of a CARD-associated risk score (CARS) with prognostic significance. (A) WGCNA revealed the correlations of gene modules with CARD clusters and immune phenotypes. Coefficient and P value of correlations were depicted in heatmap. (B) Venn plot shows the overlap of module genes and differently expressed genes. (C) LASSO penalized regression identified four genes with optimal prognostic contributions. (D) Coefficient and hazard ratio of the four identified genes in the Cox regression model. (E) PPI network indicated interactions among the identified genes. (F) Representative images of IHC staining for PTX3 expression in IDH-wt glioma samples from SYSUCC hocort. (G) Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival according to the levels of PTX3 expression. (H) Comparison of CARS between CL1 and CL2. (I) Alluvial diagram showed the changes of CARD clusters, glioma molecular subtype, and CARS subgroup. (J) Kaplan–Meier curves between high- and low-risk groups in TCGA, CGGA, and GSE16011 cohorts. (K) ROC curve analyses of CARS, T cell inflamed score and clinical factors.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival of IDH-wt glioma patients in public datasets.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |||
| Risk score | 2.84 | 2.05–3.93 | <0.001 | 2.98 | 2.04–4.35 | <0.001 |
| Age | 1.03 | 1.02–1.05 | <0.001 | 1.03 | 1.01–1.04 | 0.001 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 1.30 | 0.94–1.80 | 0.115 | – | – | – |
| Grade (GBM/LGG) | 2.34 | 1.67–3.28 | <0.001 | 1.23 | 0.80–1.88 | 0.342 |
| RT (yes/no) | 0.57 | 0.38–0.87 | 0.009 | 0.27 | 0.17–0.42 | <0.001 |
| Unmethylated | ref | – | – | – | ||
| Methylated | 1.02 | 0.71–1.45 | 0.918 | – | – | – |
| Unknown | 1.47 | 0.96–2.25 | 0.078 | – | – | – |
| Risk score | 2.17 | 1.57–3.93 | <0.001 | 1.85 | 1.32–2.60 | <0.001 |
| Age | 1.02 | 1.00–1.03 | 0.029 | 1.01 | 1.00–1.03 | 0.102 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 1.30 | 0.89–1.90 | 0.176 | – | – | – |
| Grade (GBM/LGG) | 2.17 | 1.57–3.00 | <0.001 | 1.77 | 1.14–2.73 | 0.011 |
| No | ref | – | – | – | ||
| Yes | 0.77 | 0.48–1.23 | 0.277 | – | – | – |
| Unknown | 1.79 | 0.76–4.21 | 0.183 | – | – | – |
| Unmethylated | ref | – | – | – | ||
| Methylated | 0.88 | 0.61–1.30 | 0.540 | – | – | – |
| Unknown | 0.43 | 0.14–1.38 | 0.158 | – | – | – |
| Risk score | 2.76 | 1.87–4.07 | <0.001 | 1.58 | 1.04–2.39 | 0.033 |
| Age | 1.04 | 1.03–1.06 | <0.001 | 1.03 | 1.02–1.05 | <0.001 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 0.96 | 0.63–1.45 | 0.839 | – | – | – |
| Grade (GBM/LGG) | 3.91 | 2.41–6.34 | <0.001 | 2.50 | 1.46–4.29 | 0.001 |
| RT (yes/no) | 1.10 | 0.71–1.69 | 0.672 | – | – | – |
FIGURE 4CARS indicates distinct immune landscape in TCGA IDH wild-type gliomas. (A) Heatmap showed the ssGSEA score of each immune cell populations between high- and low-risk groups. Immune cells were categorized into anti-tumor immunity, pro-tumor immunity, and unclear immune function. (B) Comparisons of expressions of cytokines; (C) genes of T cell biomarkers; (D) normalized score of CYT, MHC, and Batf3-DC gene sets; (E) fractions of infiltrating leukocyte estimated by using CIBERSORT algorithm. (F,G) Ratio of macrophages versus CD8+ T cell and regular T cell versus CD8+ T cell between high- and low-risk groups. (H) Correlation between infiltrated immune cells for anti- and pro-tumor immunity. Comparison was not implemented when median of cell fraction is less than 0.001. P values: *, <0.05; **, <0.01; ***, <0.001; ns., not significant; na., not applicable.
FIGURE 5CARS associates with disturbed oncogenic pathways. (A) Heatmap showed the ssGSEA score of the signaling pathway from the MSigDB database between high- and low-risk groups in TCGA (left) and CGGA (right) cohorts. (B,C) Spearman correlations between CARS and ssGSEA score of oncogenic pathways.
FIGURE 6Genomic alterations in the high- and low-risk group. (A) Waterfall plot of glioma somatic mutation and copy-number variation (CNV) in the high- (up) and low-risk group (down). Each column represented individual samples. The upper barplot showed mutation and CNV loads in each sample, and the right barplot indicated mutation and CNV frequencies in each gene. (B) Comparisons of non-silence mutation count, mutation rate, aneuploidy score, and neoantigen load between high- and low-risk groups. ns., not significant.
FIGURE 7CARS predicts survival benefit for glioma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves between immunotherapy-responder and non-responder. (B) Distribution of high- and low-risk group in immunotherapy-responder and non-responder. (C–E) Kaplan–Meier curves between distinct subgroups of CARS, PD-L1, and TMB based on their median levels.