Maureen Markle-Reid1,2,3,4, Rebecca Ganann1,3,4, Jenny Ploeg1,3,4,5, Gail Heald-Taylor1,3, Laurie Kennedy1,3, C McAiney3,6,7,8, Ruta Valaitis1,3,4. 1. School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 2. Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 6. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 7. Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 8. Murray Alzheimer Research & Education Program (MAREP), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient "engagement" in health research broadly refers to including people with lived experience in the research process. Although previous reviews have systematically summarized approaches to engaging older adults and their caregivers in health research, there is currently little guidance on how to meaningfully engage older adults with multimorbidity as research partners. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the lessons learned from a patient-oriented research program, the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit (ACHRU), on how to engage older adults with multimorbidity as research partners. Over the past 7-years, over 40 older adults from across Canada have been involved in 17 ACHRU projects as patient research partners. METHODS: We developed this list of lessons learned through iterative consensus building with ACHRU researchers and patient partners. We then met to collectively identify and summarize the reported successes, challenges and lessons learned from the experience of engaging older adults with multimorbidity as research partners. RESULTS: ACHRU researchers reported engaging older adult partners across many phases of the research process. Five challenges and lessons learned were identified: 1) actively finding patient partners who reflect the diversity of older adults with multimorbidity, 2) developing strong working relationships with patient partners, 3) providing education and support for both patient partners and researchers, 4) using flexible approaches for engaging patients, and 5) securing adequate resources to enable meaningful engagement. CONCLUSION: The lessons learned through this work may provide guidance to researchers on how to facilitate meaningful engagement of this vulnerable and understudied subgroup in the patient engagement literature.
BACKGROUND: Patient "engagement" in health research broadly refers to including people with lived experience in the research process. Although previous reviews have systematically summarized approaches to engaging older adults and their caregivers in health research, there is currently little guidance on how to meaningfully engage older adults with multimorbidity as research partners. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the lessons learned from a patient-oriented research program, the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit (ACHRU), on how to engage older adults with multimorbidity as research partners. Over the past 7-years, over 40 older adults from across Canada have been involved in 17 ACHRU projects as patient research partners. METHODS: We developed this list of lessons learned through iterative consensus building with ACHRU researchers and patient partners. We then met to collectively identify and summarize the reported successes, challenges and lessons learned from the experience of engaging older adults with multimorbidity as research partners. RESULTS: ACHRU researchers reported engaging older adult partners across many phases of the research process. Five challenges and lessons learned were identified: 1) actively finding patient partners who reflect the diversity of older adults with multimorbidity, 2) developing strong working relationships with patient partners, 3) providing education and support for both patient partners and researchers, 4) using flexible approaches for engaging patients, and 5) securing adequate resources to enable meaningful engagement. CONCLUSION: The lessons learned through this work may provide guidance to researchers on how to facilitate meaningful engagement of this vulnerable and understudied subgroup in the patient engagement literature.
Authors: Jeffrey L Birk; Ian M Kronish; Nathalie Moise; Louise Falzon; Sunmoo Yoon; Karina W Davidson Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Hendrik van den Bussche; Daniela Koller; Tina Kolonko; Heike Hansen; Karl Wegscheider; Gerd Glaeske; Eike-Christin von Leitner; Ingmar Schäfer; Gerhard Schön Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Nathan D Shippee; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Gabriela J Prutsky Lopez; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Mohammed Nabhan; Juan P Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; M Hassan Murad Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Jennifer Bethell; Elana Commisso; Hanne Marie Rostad; Martine Puts; Jessica Babineau; Anna Grinbergs-Saull; Mary Beth Wighton; John Hammel; Elizabeth Doyle; Sacha Nadeau; Katherine S McGilton Journal: Dementia (London) Date: 2018-11
Authors: Jenny Leese; Graham Macdonald; Sheila Kerr; Lianne Gulka; Alison M Hoens; Wendy Lum; Bao Chau Tran; Anne F Townsend; Linda C Li Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Marissa Bird; Carley Ouellette; Carly Whitmore; Lin Li; Kalpana Nair; Michael H McGillion; Jennifer Yost; Laura Banfield; Elaine Campbell; Sandra L Carroll Journal: Health Expect Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Louise Foley; Bridget Kiely; Aisling Croke; James Larkin; Susan M Smith; Barbara Clyne; Maria Pierce; Edel Murphy Journal: J Multimorb Comorb Date: 2021-06-28