Literature DB >> 33796335

Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period.

Ann M Gransjøen1, Kjetil Thorsen2, Kristin B Lysdahl3, Siri Wiig4, Bjørn M Hofmann1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An ever-increasing technological development in the field of radiology urges a need for guidelines to provide predictable and just health services. A musculoskeletal guideline was developed in Norway in 2014, without active implementation.
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of active guideline implementation on the use of musculoskeletal diagnostic imaging most frequently encountered in general practice (pain in the neck, shoulders, lower back, and knees).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The total number of outpatient radiological examinations across modalities registered at the Norwegian Health Economics Administration between January 2013 and February 2019 was assessed using an interrupted time series design.
RESULTS: A 12% reduction in the total examination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging shoulder and knee, and x-ray lower back and shoulder was found at a significant level (p = 0.05). Stratified analysis (Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination as one group and x-ray examinations as the other) showed that this reduction mainly was due to the reduction in the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging examinations (shoulder and knee) which was reduced by 24% at a significant level (p = 0.002), while x-ray examinations had no significant level change (p = 0.71). No other statistically significant changes were found.
CONCLUSION: The impact of the implementation on the use of imaging of the neck, shoulder, lower back, and knee is uncertain. Significant reductions were demonstrated in the use of some examinations in the intervention county, but similar effects were not seen when including a control group in the analysis. This indicates a diffusion of the implementation, or other interventions or events that affected both counties and occurred in the intervention period. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Musculoskeletal radiology; guideline implementation; interrupted time series; radiological guidelines; ultrasound; x-ray

Year:  2021        PMID: 33796335      PMCID: PMC7975584          DOI: 10.1177/2058460120988171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol Open


  32 in total

1.  Effects of mailed dissemination of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on general practitioner referrals for radiography: a time series analysis.

Authors:  L Matowe; C R Ramsay; J M Grimshaw; F J Gilbert; M-J Macleod; G Needham
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice.

Authors:  Jo Rycroft-Malone; Gill Harvey; Kate Seers; Alison Kitson; Brendan McCormack; Angie Titchen
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Publication bias and clinical trials.

Authors:  K Dickersin; S Chan; T C Chalmers; H S Sacks; H Smith
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1987-12

4.  Setting appropriateness guidelines for radiology.

Authors:  P N Cascade
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: an example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care.

Authors:  D Gillings; D Makuc; E Siegel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Overutilization of shoulder magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic screening tool in patients with chronic shoulder pain.

Authors:  Michael P Bradley; Glenn Tung; Andrew Green
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support?

Authors:  Bruce E Lehnert; Robert L Bree
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Developing implementation science to improve the translation of research to address low back pain: A critical review.

Authors:  Rebecca Kate Hodder; Luke Wolfenden; Steven J Kamper; Hopin Lee; Amanda Williams; Kate M O'Brien; Christopher M Williams
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.098

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in Norway 2002-2004 (national survey): rapid increase, older patients, large geographic differences.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Nils L Natvig; Ingard Løge; Lars Engebretsen; Jostein Ellingsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Implementation interventions to improve the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Alexander Mesner; Nadine E Foster; Simon David French
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.