Literature DB >> 3379584

Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex.

C L Muehlenhard1, L C Hollabaugh.   

Abstract

We investigated whether women ever engage in token resistance to sex--saying no but meaning yes--and, if they do, what their reasons are for doing so. A questionnaire administered to 610 undergraduate women asked whether they had ever engaged in token resistance and, if so, asked them to rate the importance of 26 possible reasons. We found that 39.3% of the women had engaged in token resistance at least once. Their reasons fell into three categories: practical, inhibition-related, and manipulative reasons. Women's gender role attitudes, erotophobia-erotophilia, and other attitudes and beliefs varied as a function of their experience with token resistance and their sexual experience. We argue that, given society's sexual double standard, token resistance may be a rational behavior. It could, however, have negative consequences, including discouraging honest communication, perpetuating restrictive gender stereotypes, and--if men learn to disregard women's refusals--increasing the incidence of rape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3379584     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  9 in total

1.  A Cognitive Ecological Model of Women's Response to Male Sexual Coercion in Dating.

Authors:  Paula S Nurius; Jeanette Norris
Journal:  J Psychol Human Sex       Date:  1996-07

2.  Deceptive, verbally coercive college males: attitudinal predictors and lies told.

Authors:  G J Fischer
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1996-10

3.  Sexpectations: male college students' views about displayed sexual references on females' social networking web sites.

Authors:  Megan A Moreno; Michael J Swanson; Heather Royer; Linda J Roberts
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  A gender discrepancy analysis of heterosexual sexual behaviors in two university samples.

Authors:  Kristen N Jozkowski; Sonya A Satinsky
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-12

5.  Heterosexual and homosexual coercion, sexual orientation and sexual roles in medical students.

Authors:  N McConaghy; R Zamir
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1995-10

Review 6.  Blaming the Victim of Acquaintance Rape: Individual, Situational, and Sociocultural Factors.

Authors:  Claire R Gravelin; Monica Biernat; Caroline E Bucher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-21

7.  Understanding How University Students Use Perceptions of Consent, Wantedness, and Pleasure in Labeling Rape.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Megan Pleva; Elisabeth Seib; Terri Cole
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 8.  Exploring Definitions and Prevalence of Verbal Sexual Coercion and Its Relationship to Consent to Unwanted Sex: Implications for Affirmative Consent Standards on College Campuses.

Authors:  Brandie Pugh; Patricia Becker
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-02

9.  Unsolicited Pics and Sexual Scripts: Gender and Relationship Context of Compliant and Non-consensual Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions.

Authors:  Erin Leigh Courtice; Konrad Czechowski; Pari-Gole Noorishad; Krystelle Shaughnessy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.