Gregory S Day1, Melanie Y Yarbrough2, Peter Körtvelyessy2, Harald Prüss2, Robert C Bucelli2, Marvin J Fritzler2, Warren Mason2, David F Tang-Wai2, Claude Steriade2, Julien Hébert2, Rachel L Henson2, Elizabeth M Herries2, Jack H Ladenson2, A Sebastian Lopez-Chiriboga2, Neill R Graff-Radford2, John C Morris2, Anne Fagan2. 1. From the Department of Neurology (G.S.D., A.S.L.-C., N.R.G.-R.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Departments of Pathology and Immunology (M.Y.Y., E.M.H., J.H.L.) and Neurology (R.C.B., R.L.H., E.M.H., J.H.L., J.C.M., A.F.) and The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (R.L.H., J.C.M., A.F.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (P.M.D.K.), University of Magdeburg; Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology (P.M.D.K., H.P.) Charité, Universitätmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department of Medicine (M.J.F.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary; Department of Medicine (W.M., D.F.T.-W., J.H.), Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Canada; and NYU Langone Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (C.S.), NYU Langone Health, New York, NY. day.gregory@mayo.edu. 2. From the Department of Neurology (G.S.D., A.S.L.-C., N.R.G.-R.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Departments of Pathology and Immunology (M.Y.Y., E.M.H., J.H.L.) and Neurology (R.C.B., R.L.H., E.M.H., J.H.L., J.C.M., A.F.) and The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (R.L.H., J.C.M., A.F.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (P.M.D.K.), University of Magdeburg; Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology (P.M.D.K., H.P.) Charité, Universitätmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department of Medicine (M.J.F.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary; Department of Medicine (W.M., D.F.T.-W., J.H.), Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Canada; and NYU Langone Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (C.S.), NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether neuronal and neuroaxonal injury, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction associate with clinical course and outcomes in antibody-mediated encephalitis (AME), we measured biomarkers of these processes in CSF from patients presenting with AME and cognitively normal individuals. METHODS: Biomarkers of neuronal (total tau, VILIP-1) and neuroaxonal damage (neurofilament light chain [NfL]), inflammation (YKL-40), and synaptic function (neurogranin, SNAP-25) were measured in CSF obtained from 45 patients at the time of diagnosis of NMDA receptor (n = 34) or LGI1/CASPR2 (n = 11) AME and 39 age- and sex-similar cognitively normal individuals. The association between biomarkers and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were evaluated in a subset (n = 20) of longitudinally followed patients. RESULTS: Biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury (NfL) and neuroinflammation (YKL-40) were elevated in AME cases at presentation, whereas markers of neuronal injury and synaptic function were stable (total tau) or decreased (VILIP-1, SNAP-25, neurogranin). The log-transformed ratio of YKL-40/SNAP-25 optimally discriminated patients from cognitively normal individuals (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.97, >0.99). Younger age (ρ = -0.56; p = 0.01), lower VILIP-1 (ρ = -0.60; p < 0.01) and SNAP-25 (ρ = -0.54; p = 0.01), and higher log10(YKL-40/SNAP-25) (ρ = 0.48; p = 0.04) associated with greater disease severity (higher mRS score) in prospectively followed patients. Higher YKL-40 (ρ = 0.60; p = 0.02) and neurogranin (ρ = 0.55; p = 0.03) at presentation were associated with higher mRS scores 12 months following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: CSF biomarkers suggest that neuronal integrity is acutely maintained in AME, despite neuroaxonal compromise. Low levels of biomarkers of synaptic function may reflect antibody-mediated internalization of cell surface receptors and may represent an acute correlate of antibody-mediated synaptic dysfunction, with the potential to inform disease severity and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether neuronal and neuroaxonal injury, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction associate with clinical course and outcomes in antibody-mediated encephalitis (AME), we measured biomarkers of these processes in CSF from patients presenting with AME and cognitively normal individuals. METHODS: Biomarkers of neuronal (total tau, VILIP-1) and neuroaxonal damage (neurofilament light chain [NfL]), inflammation (YKL-40), and synaptic function (neurogranin, SNAP-25) were measured in CSF obtained from 45 patients at the time of diagnosis of NMDA receptor (n = 34) or LGI1/CASPR2 (n = 11) AME and 39 age- and sex-similar cognitively normal individuals. The association between biomarkers and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were evaluated in a subset (n = 20) of longitudinally followed patients. RESULTS: Biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury (NfL) and neuroinflammation (YKL-40) were elevated in AME cases at presentation, whereas markers of neuronal injury and synaptic function were stable (total tau) or decreased (VILIP-1, SNAP-25, neurogranin). The log-transformed ratio of YKL-40/SNAP-25 optimally discriminated patients from cognitively normal individuals (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.97, >0.99). Younger age (ρ = -0.56; p = 0.01), lower VILIP-1 (ρ = -0.60; p < 0.01) and SNAP-25 (ρ = -0.54; p = 0.01), and higher log10(YKL-40/SNAP-25) (ρ = 0.48; p = 0.04) associated with greater disease severity (higher mRS score) in prospectively followed patients. Higher YKL-40 (ρ = 0.60; p = 0.02) and neurogranin (ρ = 0.55; p = 0.03) at presentation were associated with higher mRS scores 12 months following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: CSF biomarkers suggest that neuronal integrity is acutely maintained in AME, despite neuroaxonal compromise. Low levels of biomarkers of synaptic function may reflect antibody-mediated internalization of cell surface receptors and may represent an acute correlate of antibody-mediated synaptic dysfunction, with the potential to inform disease severity and outcomes.
Authors: Tobias Skillbäck; Bahman Farahmand; Jonathan W Bartlett; Christoffer Rosén; Niklas Mattsson; Katarina Nägga; Lena Kilander; Dorota Religa; Anders Wimo; Bengt Winblad; Lars Rosengren; Jonathan M Schott; Kaj Blennow; Maria Eriksdotter; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Omar F Laterza; Vijay R Modur; Dan L Crimmins; Jitka V Olander; Yvonne Landt; Jin-Moo Lee; Jack H Ladenson Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Natasha Warikoo; Samuel J Brunwasser; Ann Benz; Hong-Jin Shu; Steven M Paul; Michael Lewis; James Doherty; Michael Quirk; Laura Piccio; Charles F Zorumski; Gregory S Day; Steven Mennerick Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Sarosh R Irani; Sian Alexander; Patrick Waters; Kleopas A Kleopa; Philippa Pettingill; Luigi Zuliani; Elior Peles; Camilla Buckley; Bethan Lang; Angela Vincent Journal: Brain Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Ann Brinkmalm; Gunnar Brinkmalm; William G Honer; Lutz Frölich; Lucrezia Hausner; Lennart Minthon; Oskar Hansson; Anders Wallin; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Annika Öhrfelt Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2014-11-23 Impact factor: 14.195
Authors: Linn Hermansson; Aylin Yilmaz; Markus Axelsson; Kaj Blennow; Dietmar Fuchs; Lars Hagberg; Jan Lycke; Henrik Zetterberg; Magnus Gisslén Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: Bryce K Chang; Gregory S Day; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Andrew McKeon; Eoin P Flanagan; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Michelle M Mielke; Aivi Nguyen; David T Jones; Michel Toledano; Walter K Kremers; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Wentao Li Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Aigli G Vakrakou; John S Tzartos; Eleni Strataki; Fotini Boufidou; Eleni Dimou; Efstratios-Stylianos Pyrgelis; Vasilios C Constantinides; George P Paraskevas; Elisabeth Kapaki Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-05-28