Literature DB >> 33795336

Revised Draft Genome Sequences of Rhodomicrobium vannielii ATCC 17100 and Rhodomicrobium udaipurense JA643.

Eric M Conners1, Emily J Davenport1, Arpita Bose2.   

Abstract

Recent attempts to sequence regions of the Rhodomicrobium vannielii ATCC 17100 genome revealed discrepancies with the previously published genome. We report the revised draft genome sequences of the type strains Rhodomicrobium vannielii ATCC 17100 and Rhodomicrobium udaipurense JA643. These revisions will facilitate genetic studies of phototrophic metabolism in these bacteria.
Copyright © 2021 Conners et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33795336      PMCID: PMC8104044          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00022-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Rhodomicrobium is represented by three species, R. vannielii, R. udaipurense, and R. lacus (1–3). Rhodomicrobium strains are microaerobic to anaerobic, Gram-negative, budding, freshwater, purple nonsulfur bacteria capable of photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic metabolism, including phototrophic iron oxidation by R. vannielii and R. udaipurense (1, 4–8). To date, six Rhodomicrobium genome sequences are publicly available, including those of R. vannielii ATCC 17100 (GenBank accession number NC_014664.1) and R. udaipurense JA643 (JFZJ00000000). Recent attempts to amplify and sequence regions of the phototrophic iron oxidation (pio) three-gene operon using ATCC 17100 genomic DNA (gDNA) revealed discrepancies between the pioA nucleotide sequence in the published genome and our sequencing data. The previously published ATCC 17100 genome was assembled using Newbler v. 2.3, which performs poorly relative to similar assemblers (9, 10) and contains a bug that reduces its effectiveness (https://cals.arizona.edu/swes/maier_lab/kartchner/documentation/index.php/home/docs/newbler). The use of this assembler might account for the discrepancies we observed. Here, we resequenced the ATCC 17100 and JA643 genomes, as the JA643 assembly used ATCC 17100 as a reference. The R. vannielii type strain ATCC 17100 was purchased from DSMZ (Leibniz Institute, Braunschweig, Germany). The R. udaipurense type strain JA643 was acquired from the University of Hyderabad (Hyderabad, India). The strains were saved immediately as freezer stocks and regrown for genomic DNA isolation. Cell cultures, prepared in sterile anaerobic Balch tubes, were grown in bicarbonate-buffered anaerobic freshwater medium (6) supplemented with 10 mM sodium acetate and purged with H2-CO2 (80%/20%) to ∼70 kPa in the headspace. The cultures were incubated without shaking at 30°C, at a 30-cm distance from a 60-W incandescent light bulb. Genomic DNA was isolated from logarithmic-phase cultures using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit following the manufacturer’s recommendations (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany). Paired-end 150-bp Illumina sequencing libraries were prepared as follows: 500 ng of gDNA was fragmented using a Covaris E220 sonicator. The DNA was blunt ended and had an A base added to the 3′ ends, and Illumina sequencing adapters were ligated to the ends. The ligated fragments were amplified for eight cycles using primers incorporating unique dual-index tags. The fragments were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 S4 instrument (Illumina, Inc.) to >200× coverage for both ATCC 17100 and JA643. The read quality was assessed with FastQC v. 0.11.9 (11), and the reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic v. 0.38 (12). These reads were assembled de novo with CLC Genomics Workbench v. 10.1.2 (Qiagen Bioinformatics) (13). The draft genome sequences were quality assessed with QUAST v. 5.0.2 (14) and submitted for annotation to the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (15). The resequenced genomes were compared to the previous genomes with OrthoANI (16) and BLASTn (17). Default parameters were used for all software. The genome statistics for the draft genome sequences are found in Table 1. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analyses confirmed discrepancies with the previously published genomes. The revised ATCC 17100 (AB38) genome has an ANI value of 94.73% compared with the previously published genome, with an average aligned length of 2,222,458 bp, or 55.37% reference coverage. The revised JA643 (AB60) genome has an ANI value of 99.94% compared to JA643, with an average aligned length of 2,634,102 bp, or 75.29% reference coverage. BLASTn alignments show that AB38 shares 88%, 80%, and 89% identities with each of the three pio operon genes, respectively, compared to the previously published ATCC 17100 genome. Importantly, AB38 pioA sequencing products from cultures originating from freezer stocks that we prepared upon receipt of each strain and prior to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) share 100% identity with the revised genome, compared to 88% with the reference. BLASTn alignments between AB60 and JA643 revealed 100% identity for each of the pio operon genes. These revised draft genome sequences will facilitate future efforts to investigate the genetics underlying these organisms’ metabolic strategies.
TABLE 1

Genome statistics

StrainNo. of readsAssembly size (bp)Coverage (×)No. of contigsN50 (bp)G+C content (%)Total no. of genes
AB384,992,8863,849,08518517781,07962.23,644
AB6015,446,6693,652,92050094113,68862.53,387
Genome statistics

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun projects for AB38 and AB60 have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers JAEMUJ000000000 and JAEMUK000000000, respectively. The raw sequencing reads for AB38 and AB60 have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRX9703844 and SRX9703096, respectively. The versions described in this paper are JAEMUJ010000000 and JAEMUK010000000.
  14 in total

1.  OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity.

Authors:  Imchang Lee; Yeong Ouk Kim; Sang-Cheol Park; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  RHODOMICROBIUM VANNIELII, A NEW PHOTOHETEROTROPHIC BACTERIUM.

Authors:  E Duchow; H C Douglas
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1949-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Morphogenesis and differentiation in Rhodomicrobium vannielii and other budding and prosthecate bacteria.

Authors:  R Whittenbury; C S Dow
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-09

4.  Rhodomicrobium lacus sp. nov., an alkalitolerent bacterium isolated from Umiam lake, Shillong, India.

Authors:  Suresh G; Dhanesh Kumar; Jagadeeshwari Uppada; Sasikala Ch; Ramana Ch V
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Growth and ultrastructure of Rhodomicrobium vannielii as a function of light intensity.

Authors:  W C Trentini; M P Starr
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Anaerobic oxidation of ferrous iron by purple bacteria, a new type of phototrophic metabolism.

Authors:  A Ehrenreich; F Widdel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data.

Authors:  Sujai Kumar; Mark L Blaxter
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Photoferrotrophs Produce a PioAB Electron Conduit for Extracellular Electron Uptake.

Authors:  Dinesh Gupta; Molly C Sutherland; Karthikeyan Rengasamy; J Mark Meacham; Robert G Kranz; Arpita Bose
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.