| Literature DB >> 33794824 |
Stefanie Wessely1, Dagmar Starke2, Simone Weyers3, Christine Joisten4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of physical activity in the promotion of children's well-being and health is widely known. However, research indicates that the time spent physically exercising and participating in organized sport activities is decreasing among children. Although there is currently no gold standard for promoting sustainable physical activity in children, community-based approaches, particularly those that are multicomponent, appear to be the most successful. The project StuPs: a school- and community-based participatory approach for promoting physical activity in children and their families aims to develop a community-based approach to promoting physical activity by increasing physical literacy among elementary school children and their household members.Entities:
Keywords: Capacity building; Community-based approach; Community-based participatory research; Physical activity promotion; Physical literacy; Socially deprived urban districts
Year: 2021 PMID: 33794824 PMCID: PMC8017603 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10666-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Study Design of the StuPs Project
Modified Steps of Intervention Mapping within the StuPs Project [16]
| Step 1: Assessment of needs, wants and inventory of health-related issues to identify current conditions in terms of capacity building and physical literacy promotion in the selected districts. | |
| Step 2: Goal specification within the settings/networks with stakeholders in light of the knowledge generated in step 1. | |
| Step 3: Scientific literature research and comparison with previous results of community-based approaches as well as definitions and instruments to investigate physical literacy, aiming to accompany the theoretical approach with existing knowledge. | |
| Step 4: Derivation and development of school- and district-related measures based on the knowledge of the previous steps. In this step, the content for the measures conducted later will be created. | |
| Step 5: Definition of further procedures and implementation of the measures created previously. | |
| Step 6: Review, evaluation, and development of transfer indicators. |
Modified Principles of the Community-Based Participatory Research following Israel et al. [9]
| (1) The network sees itself as a unit. | |
| (2) The network builds on existing strengths and resources. | |
| (3) The network works transparently and in partnership. | |
| (4) The network promotes joint development, empowerment, and capacity building. | |
| (5) The network creates a balance between knowledge generation and interventions for the mutual benefit of all partners. | |
| (6) The network focuses on specific needs in the context of physical activity promotion, taking into account sociodemographic and gender characteristics as well as systematic geographical data. | |
| (7) The development of measures and implementation strategies takes place in a cyclical, iterative, and reflexive process. | |
| (8) All results and developments will be made accessible to all partners; further dissemination and use will also take place in coordination. | |
| (9) The aim is to create the basis for long-term cooperation and the establishment of the topics as a cross-sectional task of all partners involved (health in all policies), with the intention of sustainably promoting the physical activity (and health) and physical literacy of vulnerable groups. |