| Literature DB >> 33794798 |
Qiaomu Hu1, Yang Liu2, Xiaolin Liao3, Haifeng Tian4, Xiangshan Ji5, Jiajie Zhu6, Hanbing Xiao4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus is an important amphibian species in China because of its increasing economic value, protection status and special evolutionary position from aquatic to terrestrial animal. Its large genome presents challenges to genetic research. Genetic linkage mapping is an important tool for genome assembly and determination of phenotype-related loci.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese giant salamander; High-density linkage map; SNP; Sex-related loci mapping; ddRAD
Year: 2021 PMID: 33794798 PMCID: PMC8017863 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07550-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Integrated genetic linkage maps of Andreas davidianus comprising 10,896 markers assigned to 30 linkage groups (LG1–LG30). Genetic distances in Kosambi centiMorgans are listed on the left side of the linkage groups, and markers are listed on the right side of the linkage groups
The characterization of genetic linkage groups in Chinese giant salamander
| LG ID | Paternal map | Maternal map | Integrated map | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of SNPs | Distance (cM) | Average inter-loci distance (cM) | No. of SNPs | Distance (cM) | Average inter-loci distance (cM) | No. of SNPs | Distance (cM) | Average inter-loci distance (cM) | |
| 1 | 674 | 244.33 | 0.36 | 476 | 298.26 | 0.63 | 893 | 232.59 | 0.26 |
| 2 | 598 | 190.49 | 0.32 | 468 | 250.72 | 0.54 | 990 | 280.81 | 0.28 |
| 3 | 571 | 126.48 | 0.22 | 399 | 91.29 | 0.23 | 878 | 94.61 | 0.11 |
| 4 | 479 | 207.83 | 0.43 | 461 | 142.50 | 0.31 | 819 | 169.94 | 0.21 |
| 5 | 482 | 95.61 | 0.20 | 324 | 206.01 | 0.64 | 715 | 152.80 | 0.21 |
| 6 | 490 | 107.73 | 0.22 | 294 | 146.24 | 0.50 | 684 | 116.99 | 0.17 |
| 7 | 559 | 136.63 | 0.24 | 197 | 257.03 | 1.30 | 681 | 214.38 | 0.31 |
| 8 | 405 | 108.35 | 0.27 | 196 | 213.29 | 1.09 | 541 | 159.12 | 0.29 |
| 9 | 379 | 91.67 | 0.24 | 225 | 113.66 | 0.51 | 522 | 106.37 | 0.20 |
| 10 | 333 | 85.95 | 0.26 | 231 | 135.56 | 0.59 | 484 | 134.56 | 0.28 |
| 11 | 341 | 74.49 | 0.22 | 195 | 115.06 | 0.59 | 458 | 98.52 | 0.22 |
| 12 | 218 | 50.91 | 0.23 | 133 | 56.84 | 0.43 | 314 | 61.57 | 0.20 |
| 13 | 161 | 46.02 | 0.29 | 98 | 47.73 | 0.49 | 240 | 52.01 | 0.22 |
| 14 | 87 | 66.21 | 0.76 | 169 | 17.44 | 0.10 | 228 | 66.64 | 0.29 |
| 15 | 215 | 26.67 | 0.12 | 42 | 54.99 | 1.31 | 225 | 62.60 | 0.28 |
| 16 | 134 | 36.53 | 0.27 | 89 | 41.67 | 0.47 | 202 | 47.38 | 0.23 |
| 17 | 192 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8 | 25.45 | 3.18 | 192 | 56.57 | 0.29 |
| 18 | 20 | 34.47 | 1.72 | 183 | 28.12 | 0.15 | 183 | 55.65 | 0.30 |
| 19 | 178 | 32.53 | 0.18 | 27 | 62.40 | 2.31 | 180 | 74.74 | 0.42 |
| 20 | 59 | 43.77 | 0.74 | 138 | 38.81 | 0.28 | 173 | 55.06 | 0.32 |
| 21 | 156 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 | 14.25 | 7.13 | 156 | 22.19 | 0.14 |
| 22 | 152 | 1.01 | 0.01 | 10 | 15.17 | 1.52 | 152 | 40.87 | 0.27 |
| 23 | 148 | 24.67 | 0.17 | 42 | 28.41 | 0.68 | 148 | 30.32 | 0.20 |
| 24 | 58 | 14.21 | 0.25 | 89 | 45.28 | 0.51 | 136 | 35.40 | 0.26 |
| 25 | 87 | 36.90 | 0.42 | 73 | 45.41 | 0.62 | 134 | 56.00 | 0.42 |
| 26 | 28 | 70.95 | 2.53 | 129 | 36.38 | 0.28 | 129 | 62.41 | 0.48 |
| 27 | 117 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | NA | 117 | 20.68 | 0.18 |
| 28 | 111 | 19.69 | 0.18 | 23 | 36.57 | 1.59 | 111 | 32.36 | 0.29 |
| 29 | 16 | 37.70 | 2.36 | 106 | 12.47 | 0.12 | 106 | 32.35 | 0.31 |
| 30 | 105 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 | 3.03 | 1.01 | 105 | 17.61 | 0.17 |
| Total | 7553 | 2011.80 | 0.27 | 4830 | 2580.04 | 0.53 | 10,896 | 2643.10 | 0.24 |
Parameter value of loci and estimation of genetic effects
| Locus | Linkage group | Covered area cM | Associated marker | Peak of LOD | Variation % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qS-1 | LG6 | 64.9–68.5 | 97.nn_np_297384,99.nn_np_294732 | 5.8 | 29.37 |
| qS-2 | LG6 | 76.2–77 | 99.nn_np_278109 | 4.3 | 12 |
| qS-3 | LG23 | 2.0–2.1 | 90.hk_hk_96246 | 3.1 | 6.78 |
Fig. 2Sex-related loci of Andreas davidianus. The black horizontal line represents a linkage group-wise logarithm of odds significance threshold of 3.0
Correlation of markers in sex-related loci with phenotype
| Marker ID | Linkage group | Position | Match with Phenotype | Mismatch with Phenotype | Missing | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99.nn_np_263559 | LG6 | 64.94 | 68 | 25 | 2 | 63.24% |
| 99.nn_np_139095 | LG6 | 64.94 | 61 | 24 | 10 | 60.66% |
| 99.nn_np_282501 | LG6 | 65.95 | 66 | 21 | 8 | 68.18% |
| 99.nn_np_179118 | LG6 | 65.95 | 60 | 22 | 13 | 63.33% |
| 97.nn_np_297384 | LG6 | 66.96 | 63 | 22 | 10 | 65.08% |
| 99.nn_np_294732 | LG6 | 66.96 | 69 | 24 | 2 | 65.22% |
| 99.nn_np_209757 | LG6 | 76.12 | 60 | 24 | 11 | 60.00% |
| 99.nn_np_278109 | LG6 | 76.12 | 64 | 27 | 4 | 57.81% |