Background: Treatment for patients with comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins is controversial. Surgical options for these patients are limited. The study was aimed to investigate the validity of combined lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and great saphenous vein stripping (GSVS) for comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins. Methods: Thirteen patients were involved in the study, and the detail was 21 edematous lower limbs (with coexisting varicose veins and lymphedema; the varicose vein and lymphedema [VL] group) who underwent combined GSVS and LVA therapy. Fifteen patients (with 30 edematous lower limbs and lymphedema only; the lymphedema [L] group) who underwent LVA only were included as a control group. GSVS was performed before LVA in the VL group. Results: No significant differences were seen between the groups at baseline. There were no cases indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern deteriorated after GSVS. No significant difference was seen in lymphatic detection rate; 129.71% ± 58.27% (67%-333%) in the VL group and 122.27% ± 39.47% (50%-250%) in the L group (p = 0.59 > 0.05), respective lymphatic diameters 0.66 ± 0.13 (0.45-0.9) mm and 0.75 ± 0.17 (0.45-1.0) mm (p = 0.07 > 0.05), and respective lymphedema improvement rate 12.17% ± 7.35% (0%-27.4%) and 12.65% ± 7.43% (3.7%-22.3%) (p = 0.86 > 0.05). Discussion: In this study, stripping surgery does not cause lymphatic impairment, at least to the extent that would impede the success of an LVA procedure. Comorbid varicose veins and lymphedema can be treated surgically by a combination of LVA and GSVS.
Background: Treatment for patients with comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins is controversial. Surgical options for these patients are limited. The study was aimed to investigate the validity of combined lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and great saphenous vein stripping (GSVS) for comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins. Methods: Thirteen patients were involved in the study, and the detail was 21 edematous lower limbs (with coexisting varicose veins and lymphedema; the varicose vein and lymphedema [VL] group) who underwent combined GSVS and LVA therapy. Fifteen patients (with 30 edematous lower limbs and lymphedema only; the lymphedema [L] group) who underwent LVA only were included as a control group. GSVS was performed before LVA in the VL group. Results: No significant differences were seen between the groups at baseline. There were no cases indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern deteriorated after GSVS. No significant difference was seen in lymphatic detection rate; 129.71% ± 58.27% (67%-333%) in the VL group and 122.27% ± 39.47% (50%-250%) in the L group (p = 0.59 > 0.05), respective lymphatic diameters 0.66 ± 0.13 (0.45-0.9) mm and 0.75 ± 0.17 (0.45-1.0) mm (p = 0.07 > 0.05), and respective lymphedema improvement rate 12.17% ± 7.35% (0%-27.4%) and 12.65% ± 7.43% (3.7%-22.3%) (p = 0.86 > 0.05). Discussion: In this study, stripping surgery does not cause lymphatic impairment, at least to the extent that would impede the success of an LVA procedure. Comorbid varicose veins and lymphedema can be treated surgically by a combination of LVA and GSVS.
Authors: Erik M Verhey; Lyndsay A Kandi; Yeonsoo S Lee; Bryn E Morris; William J Casey; Alanna M Rebecca; Lisa A Marks; Michael A Howard; Chad M Teven Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-10-07