Rie Tanaka1, Toshikatsu Kaburaki1,2, Kazuki Taoka3, Ayako Karakawa1, Hideki Tsuji4, Masako Nishikawa5, Yutaka Yatomi5, Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku6, Tetsuo Ushiku6, Fumiyuki Araki1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan. 3. Department of Haematology and Oncology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish diagnostic criteria for vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) using cytology and laboratory tests from vitreous samples: interleukin (IL)-10/IL-6 ratio, immunoglobulin (Ig) H gene rearrangement, and clonal B-cells on flow cytometry. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with and 39 without VRL were included. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of each test and those of diagnostic criteria based on combinations of these tests. RESULTS: The sensitivity values for malignant cytology, IL-10/IL-6 > 1, IgH gene rearrangement, and flow cytometry were 0.554, 0.821, 0.732, and 0.625 with specificity of 1.000, 1.000, 0.846, and 0.974, respectively. When the diagnostic criteria were set at malignant cytology or at two or more of of four tests (atypical cells, IL-10/IL-6 > 1, IgH gene rearrangement, and flow cytometry), the sensitivity and specificity values for accurate diagnosis were 0.929 and 1.00, respectively. CONCLUSION: Malignant cytology or positive results for two or more of four tests may be adequate for VRL diagnosis.
PURPOSE: To establish diagnostic criteria for vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) using cytology and laboratory tests from vitreous samples: interleukin (IL)-10/IL-6 ratio, immunoglobulin (Ig) H gene rearrangement, and clonal B-cells on flow cytometry. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with and 39 without VRL were included. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of each test and those of diagnostic criteria based on combinations of these tests. RESULTS: The sensitivity values for malignant cytology, IL-10/IL-6 > 1, IgH gene rearrangement, and flow cytometry were 0.554, 0.821, 0.732, and 0.625 with specificity of 1.000, 1.000, 0.846, and 0.974, respectively. When the diagnostic criteria were set at malignant cytology or at two or more of of four tests (atypical cells, IL-10/IL-6 > 1, IgH gene rearrangement, and flow cytometry), the sensitivity and specificity values for accurate diagnosis were 0.929 and 1.00, respectively. CONCLUSION: Malignant cytology or positive results for two or more of four tests may be adequate for VRL diagnosis.