Literature DB >> 33793285

Psychological distress among medically complex veterans with a recent emergency department visit.

Katherine Ramos1, Megan E Shepherd-Banigan2, Karen M Stechuchak2, Cynthia Coffman2, Eugene Z Oddone2, Courtney Van Houtven2, Cristina C Hendrix3, Elizabeth P Mahanna2, Susan Nicole Hastings3.   

Abstract

Medical complexity and psychological distress are associated with frequent emergency department (ED) use. Despite this known association, our understanding is limited about which patients are at risk for persistent psychological distress and what patterns of distress emerge over time. A secondary data analysis was used to examine self-reported psychological distress (defined as ≥14 unhealthy days due to poor mental health in the past month) at 30 and 180 days following enrollment in a randomized control trial of 513 medically complex Veterans after a nonpsychiatric ED visit. We used a multivariable ordered logistic regression model to examine the association of a priori factors [baseline psychological distress, age, race, income, health literacy, deficits in activities of daily living (ADL), and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living] with three psychological distress classifications (no/low, intermittent, and persistent). Among 513 Veterans, 40% reported at baseline that they had experienced high psychological distress in the previous month. Older age was associated with lower odds of high psychological distress (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94-0.97). Baseline factors associated with significantly higher odds of persistent psychological distress at 30 and 180 days assessments, included having the inadequate income (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.02-2.55), having low health literacy (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.01-2.62), and reporting at least one ADL deficit (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.13-3.33). Psychological distress at follow-up was common among medically complex Veterans with a recent ED visit. Future research should explore interventions that integrate distress information into treatment plans and/or link to mental health referral services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33793285      PMCID: PMC8484334          DOI: 10.1037/ser0000437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Serv        ISSN: 1541-1559


  26 in total

1.  Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).

Authors:  G Andrews; T Slade
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.939

2.  Prevalence of psychological distress assessed in emergency departments.

Authors:  R Forero; L Young; K M Hillman; A E Bauman; S Ieraci
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Health-related quality of life among adults with serious psychological distress and chronic medical conditions.

Authors:  Margaret Shih; Paul A Simon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Evelyn Bromet; Marius Cuitan; Toshi A Furukawa; Oye Gureje; Hristo Hinkov; Chi-Yi Hu; Carmen Lara; Sing Lee; Zeina Mneimneh; Landon Myer; Mark Oakley-Browne; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Maria Carmen Viana; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance.

Authors:  C H Hennessy; D G Moriarty; M M Zack; P A Scherr; R Brackbill
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  The Distress Thermometer: Cutoff Points and Clinical Use

Authors:  Alexandra Cutillo; Erin O'Hea; Sharina Person; Darleen Lessard; Tina Harralson; Edwin Boudreaux
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; Hai-Yen Sung; Wendy Max; Yanling Shi; Michael Ong
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  The most frequent ED patients carry insurance and a significant burden of disease.

Authors:  Joseph B Miller; Emily Brauer; Hima Rao; Kevin Wickenheiser; Sharmistha Dev; Ronald Omino; Stephanie Stokes-Buzzelli
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Anxiety and depressive disorders in an emergency department ward of a general hospital: a control study.

Authors:  C Marchesi; E Brusamonti; C Borghi; A Giannini; R Di Ruvo; F Minneo; C Quarantelli; C Maggini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Psychological distress in medical patients 30 days following an emergency department admission: results from a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Lukas Faessler; Alexander Kutz; Sebastian Haubitz; Beat Mueller; Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2016-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.