Literature DB >> 33792682

Being the Gatekeeper: How Thinking about Sharing Affects Neural Encoding of Information.

Hang-Yee Chan1, Christin Scholz1, Elisa C Baek2, Matthew B O'Donnell3, Emily B Falk3.   

Abstract

Information transmission in a society depends on individuals' intention to share or not. Yet, little is known about whether being the gatekeeper shapes the brain's processing of incoming information. Here, we examine how thinking about sharing affects neural encoding of information, and whether this effect is moderated by the person's real-life social network position. In an functional magnetic resonance imaging study, participants rated abstracts of news articles on how much they wanted to read for themselves (read) or-as information gatekeepers-to share with a specific other (narrowcast) or to post on their social media feed (broadcast). In all conditions, consistent spatial blood oxygen level-dependent patterns associated with news articles were observed across participants in brain regions involved in perceptual and language processing as well as higher-order processes. However, when thinking about sharing, encoding consistency decreased in higher-order processing areas (e.g., default mode network), suggesting that the gatekeeper role involves more individualized processing in the brain, that is, person- and context-specific. Moreover, participants whose social networks had high ego-betweenness centrality (i.e., more likely to be information gatekeeper in real life) showed more individualized encoding when thinking about broadcasting. This study reveals how gatekeeping shapes our brain's processing of incoming information.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  information sharing; neural consistency; social network analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33792682      PMCID: PMC8258440          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  48 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms tracking popularity in real-world social networks.

Authors:  Noam Zerubavel; Peter S Bearman; Jochen Weber; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives.

Authors:  Mor Regev; Christopher J Honey; Erez Simony; Uri Hasson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Brain Activity Tracks Population Information Sharing by Capturing Consensus Judgments of Value.

Authors:  B P Doré; C Scholz; E C Baek; J O Garcia; M B O'Donnell; D S Bassett; J M Vettel; E B Falk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Same Story, Different Story.

Authors:  Yaara Yeshurun; Stephen Swanson; Erez Simony; Janice Chen; Christina Lazaridi; Christopher J Honey; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation.

Authors:  Samuel A Nastase; Valeria Gazzola; Uri Hasson; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Asif A Ghazanfar; Bruno Galantucci; Simon Garrod; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn.

Authors:  Alexandre Abraham; Fabian Pedregosa; Michael Eickenberg; Philippe Gervais; Andreas Mueller; Jean Kossaifi; Alexandre Gramfort; Bertrand Thirion; Gaël Varoquaux
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.081

9.  Brain hemodynamic activity during viewing and re-viewing of comedy movies explained by experienced humor.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Juha Pajula; Jussi Tohka; Hsin-Ju Lee; Wen-Jui Kuo; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Neural bases of recommendations differ according to social network structure.

Authors:  Matthew Brook O'Donnell; Joseph B Bayer; Christopher N Cascio; Emily B Falk
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.