Literature DB >> 33791572

Monogamy in a Moment: How do Brief Social Interactions Change Over Time in Pair-Bonded Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata)?

Nora H Prior1, Edward Smith1, Robert J Dooling1, Gregory F Ball1.   

Abstract

Research on monogamy has largely focused on marked behaviors that are unique to pair bonded partners. However, these marked behaviors represent only a subset of the pair-directed behaviors that partners engage in; the influence of pair bonding on mundane or subtle social interactions among partners remains largely unknown. In this study, we describe the changes that occur during brief social reunions (or greets) over the course of pair bonding in zebra finches. We quantified pair-directed behavior during 5-min reunions from three stages of pair bonding: initial pairing (between 4 and 72 h), early pairing (1-2 weeks), and late pairing (>1 month). These social interactions were operationalized in multiple ways. First, we quantified the overall activity levels (call and movement rates) for both the male and female. Overall, females were more active than males, but for both males and females calling activity was highest at initial pairing. We quantified behavioral coordination between partners in two ways: (1) similarity in call and movement rates between partners and (2) temporal synchrony of calls and movements between partners (via sliding correlation coefficients of time-stamped calls and movements). Overall, there were no effects of pairing stage on behavioral coordination. Finally, we used principal component analyses to disentangle behavioral coordination from the activity levels of the male and female. These results contribute to a growing line of evidence that male and female zebra finches differentially contribute to social dynamics and highlight the influence of pair bonding on the development of social dynamics. Furthermore, our preliminary analyses raise the hypothesis that behavioral coordination during the earliest phases of pairing is modulated by the extent and nature of prior experience. Overall, while behavioral coordination is clearly important for many salient interactions such as duetting, courtship displays, and biparental care, the significance of mundane social interactions for monogamous partnerships remains largely unknown.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33791572      PMCID: PMC7810576          DOI: 10.1093/iob/obaa034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Org Biol        ISSN: 2517-4843


  31 in total

1.  Neural correlates of pair-bonding in a monogamous primate.

Authors:  Karen L Bales; William A Mason; Ciprian Catana; Simon R Cherry; Sally P Mendoza
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Neuroendocrine regulation of long-term pair maintenance in the monogamous zebra finch.

Authors:  Nora H Prior; Kiran K Soma
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Maternal and paternal plasma, salivary, and urinary oxytocin and parent-infant synchrony: considering stress and affiliation components of human bonding.

Authors:  Ruth Feldman; Ilanit Gordon; Orna Zagoory-Sharon
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-12-16

4.  Same-sex partner preference in zebra finches: pairing flexibility and choice.

Authors:  Michelle L Tomaszycki; Brendon P Zatirka
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-09-05

Review 5.  The neurobiology of pair bonding: insights from a socially monogamous rodent.

Authors:  Kimberly A Young; Kyle L Gobrogge; Yan Liu; Zuoxin Wang
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Timing of incubation bouts by ring doves (Streptopelia risoria).

Authors:  G F Ball; R Silver
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Behavioral effects of progesterone on pair bonding and partner preference in the female zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Kristina O Smiley; Daniel M Vahaba; Michelle L Tomaszycki
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Fine-scale analysis of synchronous breathing in wild Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus).

Authors:  Mai Sakai; Tadamichi Morisaka; Kazunobu Kogi; Toru Hishii; Shiro Kohshima
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Mimicry and prosocial behavior.

Authors:  Rick B van Baaren; Rob W Holland; Kerry Kawakami; Ad van Knippenberg
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-01

10.  Synchronised provisioning at the nest: parental coordination over care in a socially monogamous species.

Authors:  Erica P van Rooij; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.