Literature DB >> 33791534

A Mathematical Modeling Approach to the Cort-Fitness Hypothesis.

F El Moustaid1,2, S J Lane1,2, I T Moore1,2, L R Johnson1,2,3.   

Abstract

The Cort-Fitness Hypothesis has generated much interest from investigators integrating field endocrinology with evolutionary biology, ecology, and conservation. The hypothesis was developed to test the assumption that if glucocorticoid levels increase with environmental challenges and fitness decreases with environmental challenges, then there should be a negative relationship between baseline glucocorticoid levels and fitness. Indeed, studies across diverse taxa have found that the relationship between baseline glucocorticoid levels and fitness are not consistent: some studies show a positive relationship, others negative, and some show no correlation. Hence, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the relationship between baseline glucocorticoid levels, environmental challenges, and fitness is needed. We propose a mathematical model representing the links between baseline glucocorticoid levels, environmental challenges, and fitness. Our model describes how variation in the predictability and intensity of environmental challenges, reproductive strategies, and fitness metrics can all contribute to the variability observed in empirical tests of the Cort-Fitness Hypothesis. We provide qualitative results showing that much of the inconsistency in previous studies can be explained and we discuss how the model can be used to inform future Cort-Fitness studies.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33791534      PMCID: PMC7671159          DOI: 10.1093/iob/obz019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Org Biol        ISSN: 2517-4843


  29 in total

1.  Benefits and costs of increased levels of corticosterone in seabird chicks.

Authors:  A S Kitaysky; E V Kitaiskaia; J F Piatt; J C Wingfield
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 2.  The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity.

Authors:  Marco Del Giudice; Bruce J Ellis; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  The role of predictability in the stress response of a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Leonor Galhardo; Joana Vital; Rui F Oliveira
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-12-09

Review 4.  The Reactive Scope Model - a new model integrating homeostasis, allostasis, and stress.

Authors:  L Michael Romero; Molly J Dickens; Nicole E Cyr
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 5.  In search of relationships between the acute adrenocortical response and fitness.

Authors:  Creagh W Breuner; Stephen H Patterson; Thomas P Hahn
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.822

Review 6.  Damage-Fitness Model: the missing piece in integrative stress models.

Authors:  Haruka Wada
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.493

7.  Adaptive value, entropy and survivorship curves.

Authors:  L Demetrius
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Great tits growing old: selective disappearance and the partitioning of senescence to stages within the breeding cycle.

Authors:  S Bouwhuis; B C Sheldon; S Verhulst; A Charmantier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Elevated corticosterone during egg production elicits increased maternal investment and promotes nestling growth in a wild songbird.

Authors:  E Keith Bowers; Rachel M Bowden; Charles F Thompson; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Stress and reproductive hormones reflect inter-specific social and nutritional conditions mediated by resource availability in a bear-salmon system.

Authors:  Heather M Bryan; Chris T Darimont; Paul C Paquet; Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Judit E G Smits
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.