Literature DB >> 33791395

Clinical Performance of New Software to Automatically Detect Angioectasias in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.

Dalila Costa1,2,3, Pedro Vieira4, Catarina Pinto1, Bruno Arroja3, Tiago Leal3, Sofia Mendes1,2,3, Raquel Gonçalves3, Carlos Lima4, Carla Rolanda1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) revolutionized the diagnosis and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, though the rate of detection of small bowel lesions by the physician is still disappointing. Our group developed a novel algorithm (CMEMS-Uminho) to automatically detect angioectasias which display greater accuracy in VCE static frames than other methods previously published. We aimed to evaluate the algorithm overall performance and assess its diagnostic yield and usability in clinical practice.
METHODS: Algorithm overall performance was determined using 54 full-length VCE recordings. To assess its diagnostic yield and usability in clinical practice, 38 VCE examinations with the clinical diagnosis of angioectasias consecutively performed (2017-2018) were evaluated by three physicians with different experiences. The CMEMS-Uminho algorithm was also applied. The performance of the CMEMS-Uminho algorithm was defined by a positive concordance between a frame automatically selected by the software and a study independent capsule endoscopist.
RESULTS: Overall performance in complete VCE recordings was 77.7%, and diagnostic yield was 94.7%. There were significant differences between physicians in regard to global detection rate (p < 0.001), detection rate per capsule (p < 0.001), diagnostic yield (p = 0.007), true positive rate (p < 0.001), time (p < 0.001), and speed viewing (p < 0.001). The application of CMEMS-Uminho algorithm significantly enhanced all readers' global detection rate (p < 0.001) and the differences between them were no longer observed.
CONCLUSION: The CMEMS-Uminho algorithm detained a good overall performance and was able to enhance physicians' performance, suggesting a potential usability of this tool in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Angioectasias; Automatic detection; Video capsule endoscopy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33791395      PMCID: PMC7991495          DOI: 10.1159/000510024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2387-1954


  27 in total

1.  Segmentation of angiodysplasia lesions in WCE images using a MAP approach with Markov Random Fields.

Authors:  Pedro M Vieira; Bruno Goncalves; Carla R Goncalves; Carlos S Lima
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: indications, risks and limitations.

Authors:  Emanuele Rondonotti; Federica Villa; Chris J J Mulder; Maarten A J M Jacobs; Roberto de Franchis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Amy Wang; Subhas Banerjee; Bradley A Barth; Yasser M Bhat; Shailendra Chauhan; Klaus T Gottlieb; Vani Konda; John T Maple; Faris Murad; Patrick R Pfau; Douglas K Pleskow; Uzma D Siddiqui; Jeffrey L Tokar; Sarah A Rodriguez
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Capsule endoscopy: Is the software TOP 100 a reliable tool in suspected small bowel bleeding?

Authors:  Cátia Arieira; Sara Monteiro; Francisca Dias de Castro; Pedro Boal Carvalho; Bruno Rosa; Maria João Moreira; José Cotter
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 5.  The validity of suspected blood indicator software in capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diana E Yung; Catherine Sykes; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  Virtual chromoendoscopy in small bowel capsule endoscopy: New light or a cast of shadow?

Authors:  José Cotter; Joana Magalhães; Francisca Dias de Castro; Mara Barbosa; Pedro Boal Carvalho; Sílvia Leite; Maria João Moreira; Bruno Rosa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-08-16

7.  A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions.

Authors:  M Appleyard; Z Fireman; A Glukhovsky; H Jacob; R Shreiver; S Kadirkamanathan; A Lavy; S Lewkowicz; E Scapa; R Shofti; P Swain; A Zaretsky
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Segmentation of small bowel tumor tissue in capsule endoscopy images by using the MAP algorithm.

Authors:  Pedro Vieira; Jaime Ramos; Daniel Barbosa; Dalila Roupar; Carlos Silva; Higino Correia; Carlos S Lima
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Role of small-bowel endoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an international OMED-ECCO consensus.

Authors:  A Bourreille; A Ignjatovic; L Aabakken; E V Loftus; R Eliakim; M Pennazio; Y Bouhnik; E Seidman; M Keuchel; J G Albert; S Ardizzone; S Bar-Meir; R Bisschops; E J Despott; P F Fortun; R Heuschkel; J Kammermeier; J A Leighton; G J Mantzaris; D Moussata; S Lo; V Paulsen; J Panés; G Radford-Smith; W Reinisch; E Rondonotti; D S Sanders; J M Swoger; H Yamamoto; S Travis; J-F Colombel; A Van Gossum
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Performance characteristics of the suspected blood indicator feature in capsule endoscopy according to indication for study.

Authors:  Jonathan M Buscaglia; Samuel A Giday; Sergey V Kantsevoy; John O Clarke; Priscilla Magno; Elaine Yong; Gerard E Mullin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.